Literature DB >> 24753542

The RAD51-stimulatory compound RS-1 can exploit the RAD51 overexpression that exists in cancer cells and tumors.

Jennifer M Mason1, Hillary L Logan1, Brian Budke1, Megan Wu1, Michal Pawlowski2, Ralph R Weichselbaum3, Alan P Kozikowski2, Douglas K Bishop4, Philip P Connell5.   

Abstract

RAD51 is the central protein that catalyzes DNA repair via homologous recombination, a process that ensures genomic stability. RAD51 protein is commonly expressed at high levels in cancer cells relative to their noncancerous precursors. High levels of RAD51 expression can lead to the formation of genotoxic RAD51 protein complexes on undamaged chromatin. We developed a therapeutic approach that exploits this potentially toxic feature of malignancy, using compounds that stimulate the DNA-binding activity of RAD51 to promote cancer cell death. A panel of immortalized cell lines was challenged with the RAD51-stimulatory compound RS-1. Resistance to RS-1 tended to occur in cells with higher levels of RAD54L and RAD54B, which are Swi2/Snf2-related translocases known to dissociate RAD51 filaments from dsDNA. In PC3 prostate cancer cells, RS-1-induced lethality was accompanied by the formation of microscopically visible RAD51 nuclear protein foci occurring in the absence of any DNA-damaging treatment. Treatment with RS-1 promoted significant antitumor responses in a mouse model, providing proof-of-principle for this novel therapeutic strategy. ©2014 American Association for Cancer Research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24753542      PMCID: PMC4079730          DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-13-3220

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Res        ISSN: 0008-5472            Impact factor:   12.701


  31 in total

1.  Over-expression of wild-type Rad51 correlates with histological grading of invasive ductal breast cancer.

Authors:  H Maacke; S Opitz; K Jost; W Hamdorf; W Henning; S Krüger; A C Feller; A Lopens; K Diedrich; E Schwinger; H W Stürzbecher
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2000-12-15       Impact factor: 7.396

2.  XRCC2 and XRCC3, new human Rad51-family members, promote chromosome stability and protect against DNA cross-links and other damages.

Authors:  N Liu; J E Lamerdin; R S Tebbs; D Schild; J D Tucker; M R Shen; K W Brookman; M J Siciliano; C A Walter; W Fan; L S Narayana; Z Q Zhou; A W Adamson; K J Sorensen; D J Chen; N J Jones; L H Thompson
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 17.970

3.  Effects of HsRad51 overexpression on cell proliferation, cell cycle progression, and apoptosis.

Authors:  J Flygare; S Fält; J Ottervald; J Castro; D Hellgren; A Wennborg
Journal:  Exp Cell Res       Date:  2001-08-01       Impact factor: 3.905

Review 4.  Homologous recombinational repair of DNA ensures mammalian chromosome stability.

Authors:  L H Thompson; D Schild
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  2001-06-02       Impact factor: 2.433

5.  Pilot study examining tumor expression of RAD51 and clinical outcomes in human head cancers.

Authors:  Philip P Connell; Krishanthi Jayathilaka; Daniel J Haraf; Ralph R Weichselbaum; Everett E Vokes; Mark W Lingen
Journal:  Int J Oncol       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 5.650

6.  Chromosome instability and defective recombinational repair in knockout mutants of the five Rad51 paralogs.

Authors:  M Takata; M S Sasaki; S Tachiiri; T Fukushima; E Sonoda; D Schild; L H Thompson; S Takeda
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 4.272

7.  RAD51 up-regulation bypasses BRCA1 function and is a common feature of BRCA1-deficient breast tumors.

Authors:  Richard W Martin; Brian J Orelli; Mitsuyoshi Yamazoe; Andy J Minn; Shunichi Takeda; Douglas K Bishop
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2007-10-15       Impact factor: 12.701

8.  Combined evaluation of Rad51 and ERCC1 expressions for sensitivity to platinum agents in non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Tomoyoshi Takenaka; Ichiro Yoshino; Hidenori Kouso; Taro Ohba; Tomofumi Yohena; Atsushi Osoegawa; Fumihiro Shoji; Yoshihiko Maehara
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2007-08-15       Impact factor: 7.396

9.  High-level expression of Rad51 is an independent prognostic marker of survival in non-small-cell lung cancer patients.

Authors:  G-B Qiao; Y-L Wu; X-N Yang; W-Z Zhong; D Xie; X-Y Guan; D Fischer; H-C Kolberg; S Kruger; H-W Stuerzbecher
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2005-07-11       Impact factor: 7.640

10.  Real-time solution measurement of RAD51- and RecA-mediated strand assimilation without background annealing.

Authors:  Brian Budke; Yuen-Ling Chan; Douglas K Bishop; Philip P Connell
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2013-05-10       Impact factor: 16.971

View more
  21 in total

Review 1.  Role of NRP-1 in VEGF-VEGFR2-Independent Tumorigenesis.

Authors:  Chenxi Hu; Xiaodong Jiang
Journal:  Target Oncol       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 4.493

2.  RADX Promotes Genome Stability and Modulates Chemosensitivity by Regulating RAD51 at Replication Forks.

Authors:  Huzefa Dungrawala; Kamakoti P Bhat; Rémy Le Meur; Walter J Chazin; Xia Ding; Shyam K Sharan; Sarah R Wessel; Aditya A Sathe; Runxiang Zhao; David Cortez
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2017-07-20       Impact factor: 17.970

3.  RPA Stabilization of Single-Stranded DNA Is Critical for Break-Induced Replication.

Authors:  Patrick Ruff; Roberto A Donnianni; Eleanor Glancy; Julyun Oh; Lorraine S Symington
Journal:  Cell Rep       Date:  2016-12-20       Impact factor: 9.423

Review 4.  DNA repair targeted therapy: The past or future of cancer treatment?

Authors:  Navnath S Gavande; Pamela S VanderVere-Carozza; Hilary D Hinshaw; Shadia I Jalal; Catherine R Sears; Katherine S Pawelczak; John J Turchi
Journal:  Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2016-02-16       Impact factor: 12.310

Review 5.  Recent Developments Using Small Molecules to Target RAD51: How to Best Modulate RAD51 for Anticancer Therapy?

Authors:  Brian Budke; Wei Lv; Alan P Kozikowski; Philip P Connell
Journal:  ChemMedChem       Date:  2016-10-26       Impact factor: 3.466

6.  Effects of RAD51-stimulatory compound 1 (RS-1) and its vehicle, DMSO, on pig embryo culture.

Authors:  C G Lucas; B K Redel; P R Chen; L D Spate; R S Prather; K D Wells
Journal:  Reprod Toxicol       Date:  2021-08-15       Impact factor: 3.421

Review 7.  Clinically Applicable Inhibitors Impacting Genome Stability.

Authors:  Anu Prakash; Juan F Garcia-Moreno; James A L Brown; Emer Bourke
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2018-05-13       Impact factor: 4.411

8.  Dynamin impacts homology-directed repair and breast cancer response to chemotherapy.

Authors:  Sophia B Chernikova; Rochelle B Nguyen; Jessica T Truong; Stephano S Mello; Jason H Stafford; Michael P Hay; Andrew Olson; David E Solow-Cordero; Douglas J Wood; Solomon Henry; Rie von Eyben; Lei Deng; Melanie Hayden Gephart; Asaithamby Aroumougame; Claudia Wiese; John C Game; Balázs Győrffy; J Martin Brown
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2018-10-29       Impact factor: 14.808

9.  The epigenetic regulator LSH maintains fork protection and genomic stability via MacroH2A deposition and RAD51 filament formation.

Authors:  Xiaoping Xu; Kai Ni; Yafeng He; Jianke Ren; Chongkui Sun; Yie Liu; Mirit I Aladjem; Sandra Burkett; Richard Finney; Xia Ding; Shyam K Sharan; Kathrin Muegge
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2021-06-10       Impact factor: 14.919

10.  RAD54 family translocases counter genotoxic effects of RAD51 in human tumor cells.

Authors:  Jennifer M Mason; Kritika Dusad; William Douglass Wright; Jennifer Grubb; Brian Budke; Wolf-Dietrich Heyer; Philip P Connell; Ralph R Weichselbaum; Douglas K Bishop
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2015-03-12       Impact factor: 16.971

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.