| Literature DB >> 24751978 |
Tsukasa Takahashi1, Kisaburo Hanazawa2, Takashi Inoue3, Kenya Sato4, Ayako Sedohara4, Junko Okahara4, Hiroshi Suemizu5, Chie Yagihashi5, Masafumi Yamamoto5, Tomoo Eto4, Yusuke Konno6, Hideyuki Okano7, Makoto Suematsu8, Erika Sasaki9.
Abstract
Intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI), an important method used to treat male subfertility, is applied in the transgenic technology of sperm-mediated gene transfer. However, no study has described successful generation of offspring using ICSI in the common marmoset, a small non-human primate used as a model for biomedical translational research. In this study, we investigated blastocyst development and the subsequent live offspring stages of marmoset oocytes matured in vitro and fertilized by ICSI. To investigate the optimal timing of performing ICSI, corrected immature oocytes were matured in vitro and ICSI was performed at various time points (1-2 h, 2-4 h, 4-6 h, 6-8 h, and 8-10 h after extrusion of the first polar body (PB)). Matured oocytes were then divided randomly into two groups: one was used for in vitro fertilization (IVF) and the other for ICSI. To investigate in vivo development of embryos followed by ICSI, 6-cell- to 8-cell-stage embryos and blastocysts were nonsurgically transferred into recipient marmosets. Although no significant differences were observed in the fertilization rate of blastocysts among ICSI timing after the first PB extrusion, the blastocyst rate at 1-2 h was lowest among groups at 2-4 h, 4-6 h, 6-8 h, and 8-10 h. Comparing ICSI to IVF, the fertilization rates obtained in ICSI were higher than in IVF (p>0.05). No significant difference was noted in the cleaved blastocyst rate between ICSI and IVF. Following the transfer of 37 ICSI blastocysts, 4 of 20 recipients became pregnant, while with the transfer of 21 6-cell- to 8-cell-stage ICSI embryos, 3 of 8 recipients became pregnant. Four healthy offspring were produced and grew normally. These are the first marmoset offspring produced by ICSI, making it an effective fertilization method for marmosets.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2014 PMID: 24751978 PMCID: PMC3994092 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0095560
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
List of primers and their sequences in multiplex PCR.
| Name | Sequence of the labeled primer (5′–3′) | Dye | Name | Sequence of the non-labeled primer (5′–3′) |
| 2463P-TH |
| FAM | 2463P-TH-NL |
|
| CJ060 |
| PET | CJ060-NL |
|
| CJ077 |
| PET | CJ077-NL |
|
| CJ081 |
| VIC | CJ081-NL |
|
| CJ103 |
| NED | CJ103-NL |
|
| CJ187 |
| FAM | CJ187-NL |
|
| CJ003 |
| NED | CJ003-NL |
|
| CJ083 |
| VIC | CJ083-NL |
|
| CJ091 |
| FAM | CJ091-NL |
|
| CJ146 |
| PET | CJ146-NL |
|
Figure 1ICSI of marmoset oocytes after in vitro maturation.
(A) The zona pellucida was drilled using piezo pulses, and the pipette was inserted deep into the oocyte and a single piezo pulse was applied. Sperm were inserted into the oocyte (bar = 100 µm). (B) Marmoset blastocysts produced by ICSI. (bar = 100 µm).
Fertilization and developmental rates after ICSI of in vitro-matured marmoset oocytes.
| ICSI time post-firstPB extrusion | No. of oocytes | No. (%) | No. (%) | ||
| 2-cell | 8-cell | Blastocyst | |||
| 1–2 h | 23 | 20 (87) | 18 (90) | 14 (70) | 1 (5) |
| 2–4 h | 20 | 19 (95) | 18 (94.7) | 16 (84.2) | 6 (31.6) |
| 4–6 h | 25 | 25 (100) | 25 (100) | 20 (80) | 4 (16.0) |
| 6–8 h | 16 | 15 (93.8) | 15 (93.8) | 13 (86.7) | 4 (26.7) |
| 8–10 h | 20 | 20 (100) | 20 (100) | 16 (80) | 4 (20) |
*1Numbers in parentheses were calculated from total oocytes.
*2Numbers in parentheses were calculated from fertilized oocytes.
Effect of fertilization method on in vitro development of marmoset oocytes.
| No. of maturedoocytes | No. (%) | No. (%) | |||||
| 2-cell | 8-cell | 16-cell | Morula | Blastocyst | |||
| ICSI | 88 | 82(93.2)a | 80(97.6) | 63(76.8) | 43(52.4) | 32(39.0) | 29(35.4) |
| IVF | 90 | 74(82.2)b | 69(93.2) | 62(83.8) | 48(64.9) | 36(48.6) | 29(39.2) |
Values within the same column with different letters (a, b) differ significantly (p<0.05), χ2-test.
*1Numbers in parentheses were calculated from total oocytes.
*2Numbers in parentheses were calculated from fertilized oocytes.
The length of embryonic development until the blastocyst stage of the embryos derived by ICSI and IVF.
| No. of total blastocyst | No. (%) | |||
| Day 9 | Day 10 | Day 11 | ||
| ICSI | 29 | 6 (20.7) | 9 (31.0) | 14 (48.3) |
| IVF | 29 | 9 (31.0) | 10 (34.5) | 10 (34.5) |
*Numbers in parentheses were calculated from total blastocysts.
Day 0: Day of fertilization.
Figure 2Devices for nonsurgical embryo transfer.
Newly developed devices for nonsurgical embryo transfer. (A) I: 23-G, 120-mm-long blunt-end stainless steel stylet II: polyethylene 160-mm-long cannula (inner diameter 0.28 mm, outer diameter 0.61 mm) for embryo transfer, III: Fluon ETFE 20-G, 108-mm-long cannula (A blunt/tapered cannula; inner diameter 0.8 mm, outer diameter 1.10 mm), IV: endoscope for small animals, V: tapered to 4.2 mm, 6.0 mm in diameter and tapered to 5.0 mm, 7.0 mm in diameter and tapered to 5.3 mm at one end of the glass tubes for vaginal dilation and manipulation of the cannulae. (B) Scheme for nonsurgical embryo transfer.
Figure 3First offspring produced by ICSI in marmosets.
Four healthy neonates were generated using ICSI. A female (A) 635 produced by blastocyst transfer and a male neonate (B) 732, male (C) 737 and female neonate (D) 640 from 6-cell- to 8-cell stage embryo transfer.
Pregnancy and birth rates following nonsurgical embryo transfer to recipients of common marmoset embryos produced by ICSI.
| Embryo age: stage attransfer | No. of Embryostransferred | No. of recipients | No. (%) | No. (%) | No. (%) | ||
| Total | Delivered | Aborted | |||||
| 6-cell–8-cell (day 5) | 21 | 8 | 3 (37.5) | 3 (37.5) | 0 (0) | 6 (28.6)a | 3 (14.3) |
| Blastocyst (day 12) | 37 | 20 | 4 (20) | 1 (5) | 3 (15) | 1 (2.7)b | 0 (0) |
Values within the same column with different letters (a, b) differ significantly (p<0.05), χ2-test.
*1Numbers in parentheses were calculated from total recipients.
*2Numbers in parentheses were calculated from total embryos.
Details of offspring produced by ICSI.
| Transferred embryo(stage/numer) | The neonates ID | Body weight (g) | Status after birth |
| Blastocyst/2 | 635 | 36 | alive |
| 8-cell/3 | 731 | 27.7 | dead on day 5 |
| 732 | 25.6 | alive | |
| 733 | 24.6 | dead on day 16 | |
| 734 | ND | dead on day 1 | |
| 8-cell/2 | 737 | 32 | alive |
| 8-cell/2, 6-cell/1 | 640 | 32 | alive |
Analysis of microsatellite genotypes of donors, recipients, and offspring in embryo transfer of marmoset embryo produced by ICSI.
| Marker | ||||||||||||
| Pedigree | The neonates ID | Sex | 2463-TH-FAM | CJ060-PET | CJ077-VIC | CJ081-VIC | CJ103-NED | CJ187-FAM | CJ003-NED | CJ083-VIC | CJ091-FAM | CJ146-PET |
| #1 | Recipient 2370 | Female | 109/109 | 135/146 | 205/205 | 170/184 | 119/121 | 201/201 | 90/94 | 119/125 | 139/145 | 134/134 |
| Recipient 3298 | Male | 109/109 | 146/151 | 205/213 | 184/186 | 119/121 | 201/207 | 94/94 | 119/121 | 139/139 | 132/134 | |
| Donor 3464 | Female | 109/109 |
|
| 160/ | 111/ | 201/201 | 94/ |
| 139/139 | 132/134 | |
| Donor 691 | Male | 109/109 |
| 205/ | 168/ |
| 201/207 |
| 115/ | 139/139 | 132/134 | |
| Offspring 635 | Female | 109/109 |
|
|
|
| 201/207 |
|
| 139/139 | 134/134 | |
| #2 | Recipient 2343 | Female | 109/109 | 135/135 | 205/211 | 160/186 | 117/117 | 201/201 | 94/98 | 121/121 | 139/139 | 132/132 |
| Recipient 659 | Male | 109/109 | 149/151 | 213/213 | 170/170 | 111/121 | 201/209 | 94/96 | 121/125 | 139/147 | 134/134 | |
| Donor 3525 | Female | 109/109 | 135/ | 205/213 | 160/ | 119/ | 201/209 | 94/94 | 121/121 | 139/139 | 132/134 | |
| Donor 666 | Male | 109/109 |
| 205/213 |
| 119/ | 201/201 | 94/98 | 121/121 | 139/139 | 134/134 | |
| Offspring 731 | Male | 109/109 |
| 213/213 |
|
| 201/201 | 94/98 | 121/121 | 139/139 | 132/134 | |
| Offspring 732 | Male | 109/109 |
| 205/213 |
|
| 201/209 | 94/98 | 121/121 | 139/139 | 134/134 | |
| Offspring 733 | Male | 109/109 |
| 213/213 |
|
| 201/201 | 94/98 | 121/121 | 139/139 | 132/134 | |
| Offspring 734 | Male | 109/109 |
| 213/213 |
|
| 201/201 | 94/98 | 121/121 | 139/139 | 132/134 | |
| #3 | Recipient 2706 | Female | 109/109 | 135/146 | 205/205 | 170/184 | 117/125 | 201/201 | 90/94 | 119/125 | 139/145 | 134/134 |
| Recipient 3346 | Male | 109/109 | 135/139 | 205/205 | 184/186 | 117/117 | 201/201 | 94/98 | 119/121 | 139/139 | 134/134 | |
| Donor 2703 | Female | 109/109 | 135/146 | 205/205 |
| 107/ | 201/207 | 94/98 |
| 139/139 | 132/134 | |
| Donor 666 | Male | 109/109 | 135/135 | 205/213 |
|
| 201/201 | 94/98 |
| 139/139 | 134/134 | |
| Offspring 737 | Male | 109/109 | 135/135 | 205/205 |
|
| 201/201 | 94/94 |
| 139/139 | 134/134 | |
| #4 | Recipient 3196 | Female | 109/109 | 135/137 | 205/205 | 160/170 | 107/121 | 201/201 | 90/94 | 121/123 | 139/139 | 132/134 |
| Recipient 3343 | Female | 109/109 | 135/135 | 203/205 | 168/168 | 111/121 | 201/201 | 94/98 | 121/123 | 139/139 | 132/134 | |
| Donor 2703 | Female | 109/109 | 135/ | 205/205 |
|
| 201/207 | 94/98 | 121/121 | 139/139 | 132/134 | |
| Donor 666 | Male | 109/109 |
| 205/213 |
|
| 201/201 | 94/98 | 121/121 | 139/139 | 134/134 | |
| Offspring 640 | Female | 109/109 |
| 205/205 |
|
| 201/201 | 94/94 | 121/121 | 139/139 | 134134 | |
*1Size in bp.
*2Underlined numbers indicate unique alleles inherited from the donor, and bold numbers indicate the genotypes used to determine whether the offspring were derived from donor animals.