Literature DB >> 17340207

Active integration: new strategies for transgenesis.

Eric T Shinohara1, Joseph M Kaminski, David J Segal, Pawel Pelczar, Ravindra Kolhe, Thomas Ryan, Craig J Coates, Malcolm J Fraser, Alfred M Handler, Ryuzo Yanagimachi, Stefan Moisyadi.   

Abstract

This paper presents novel methods for producing transgenic animals, with a further emphasis on how these techniques may someday be applied in gene therapy. There are several passive methods for transgenesis, such as pronuclear microinjection (PNI) and Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection-Mediated Transgenesis (ICSI-Tr), which rely on the repair mechanisms of the host for transgene (tg) insertion. ICSI-Tr has been shown to be an effective means of creating transgenic animals with a transfection efficiency of approximately 45% of animals born. Furthermore, because this involves the injection of the transgene into the cytoplasm of oocytes during fertilization, limited mosaicism has traditionally occurred using this technique. Current active transgenesis techniques involve the use of viruses, such as disarmed retroviruses which can insert genes into the host genome. However, these methods are limited by the size of the sequence that can be inserted, high embryo mortality, and randomness of insertion. A novel active method has been developed which combines ICSI-Tr with recombinases or transposases to increase transfection efficiency. This technique has been termed "Active Transgenesis" to imply that the tg is inserted into the host genome by enzymes supplied into the oocyte during tg introduction. DNA based methods alleviate many of the costs and time associated with purifying enzyme. Further studies have shown that RNA can be used for the transposase source. Using RNA may prevent problems with continued transposase activity that can occur if a DNA transposase is integrated into the host genome. At present piggyBac is the most effective transposon for stable integration in mammalian systems and as further studies are done to elucidate modifications which improve piggyBac's specificity and efficacy, efficiency in creating transgenic animals should improve further. Subsequently, these methods may someday be used for gene therapy in humans.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17340207     DOI: 10.1007/s11248-007-9077-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transgenic Res        ISSN: 0962-8819            Impact factor:   2.788


  31 in total

Review 1.  Pronuclear microinjection.

Authors:  R J Wall
Journal:  Cloning Stem Cells       Date:  2001

2.  Mammalian transgenesis by intracytoplasmic sperm injection.

Authors:  A C Perry; T Wakayama; H Kishikawa; T Kasai; M Okabe; Y Toyoda; R Yanagimachi
Journal:  Science       Date:  1999-05-14       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  RNA as a source of transposase for Sleeping Beauty-mediated gene insertion and expression in somatic cells and tissues.

Authors:  Andrew Wilber; Joel L Frandsen; Jennifer L Geurts; David A Largaespada; Perry B Hackett; R Scott McIvor
Journal:  Mol Ther       Date:  2005-12-20       Impact factor: 11.454

4.  Chimeric Mos1 and piggyBac transposases result in site-directed integration.

Authors:  K J Maragathavally; J M Kaminski; C J Coates
Journal:  FASEB J       Date:  2006-07-28       Impact factor: 5.191

5.  piggyBac is a flexible and highly active transposon as compared to sleeping beauty, Tol2, and Mos1 in mammalian cells.

Authors:  Sareina Chiung-Yuan Wu; Yaa-Jyuhn James Meir; Craig J Coates; Alfred M Handler; Pawel Pelczar; Stefan Moisyadi; Joseph M Kaminski
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-09-27       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Molecular reconstruction of Sleeping Beauty, a Tc1-like transposon from fish, and its transposition in human cells.

Authors:  Z Ivics; P B Hackett; R H Plasterk; Z Izsvák
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1997-11-14       Impact factor: 41.582

7.  Molecular analysis of chromosomal rearrangements in mammalian cells after phiC31-mediated integration.

Authors:  Anja Ehrhardt; Jeffrey A Engler; Hui Xu; Athena M Cherry; Mark A Kay
Journal:  Hum Gene Ther       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 5.695

8.  Design of a nonviral vector for site-selective, efficient integration into the human genome.

Authors:  Joseph M Kaminski; Mark R Huber; James B Summers; Matthew B Ward
Journal:  FASEB J       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 5.191

9.  FISH analysis of 142 EGFP transgene integration sites into the mouse genome.

Authors:  Tomoko Nakanishi; Asato Kuroiwa; Shuichi Yamada; Ayako Isotani; Atsuko Yamashita; Ai Tairaka; Tamon Hayashi; Tatsuya Takagi; Masahito Ikawa; Yoichi Matsuda; Masaru Okabe
Journal:  Genomics       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 5.736

10.  Helper-Independent Sleeping Beauty transposon-transposase vectors for efficient nonviral gene delivery and persistent gene expression in vivo.

Authors:  Jacob Giehm Mikkelsen; Stephen R Yant; Leonard Meuse; Zan Huang; Hui Xu; Mark A Kay
Journal:  Mol Ther       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 11.454

View more
  12 in total

1.  Helper-independent piggyBac plasmids for gene delivery approaches: strategies for avoiding potential genotoxic effects.

Authors:  Johann Urschitz; Miyuri Kawasumi; Jesse Owens; Kazuto Morozumi; Hideaki Yamashiro; Ilko Stoytchev; Joel Marh; James A Dee; Kris Kawamoto; Craig J Coates; Joseph M Kaminski; Pawel Pelczar; Ryuzo Yanagimachi; Stefan Moisyadi
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-04-19       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 2.  Use of intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) to generate transgenic animals.

Authors:  Stefan Moisyadi; Joseph M Kaminski; Ryuzo Yanagimachi
Journal:  Comp Immunol Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2008-08-08       Impact factor: 2.268

Review 3.  Exogenous enzymes upgrade transgenesis and genetic engineering of farm animals.

Authors:  Pablo Bosch; Diego O Forcato; Fabrisio E Alustiza; Ana P Alessio; Alejandro E Fili; María F Olmos Nicotra; Ana C Liaudat; Nancy Rodríguez; Thirumala R Talluri; Wilfried A Kues
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2015-02-01       Impact factor: 9.261

Review 4.  The construction of transgenic and gene knockout/knockin mouse models of human disease.

Authors:  Alfred Doyle; Michael P McGarry; Nancy A Lee; James J Lee
Journal:  Transgenic Res       Date:  2011-07-29       Impact factor: 2.788

5.  Construction of transformed, cultured silkworm cells and transgenic silkworm using the site-specific integrase system from phage φC31.

Authors:  Yajuan Yin; Guangli Cao; Renyu Xue; Chengliang Gong
Journal:  Mol Biol Rep       Date:  2014-07-03       Impact factor: 2.316

Review 6.  New and improved tools for in utero electroporation studies of developing cerebral cortex.

Authors:  Joseph LoTurco; Jean-Bernard Manent; Faez Sidiqi
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2009-04-24       Impact factor: 5.357

Review 7.  A survey to establish performance standards for the production of transgenic mice.

Authors:  Thomas J Fielder; Laura Barrios; Lluís Montoliu
Journal:  Transgenic Res       Date:  2009-10-20       Impact factor: 2.788

8.  Birth of healthy offspring following ICSI in in vitro-matured common marmoset (Callithrix jacchus) oocytes.

Authors:  Tsukasa Takahashi; Kisaburo Hanazawa; Takashi Inoue; Kenya Sato; Ayako Sedohara; Junko Okahara; Hiroshi Suemizu; Chie Yagihashi; Masafumi Yamamoto; Tomoo Eto; Yusuke Konno; Hideyuki Okano; Makoto Suematsu; Erika Sasaki
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-04-21       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Regulated gene insertion by steroid-induced PhiC31 integrase.

Authors:  Nynne Sharma; Brian Moldt; Trine Dalsgaard; Thomas G Jensen; Jacob Giehm Mikkelsen
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2008-05-22       Impact factor: 16.971

10.  Effective Targeted Gene Knockdown in Mammalian Cells Using the piggyBac Transposase-based Delivery System.

Authors:  Jesse B Owens; Juanita Mathews; Philip Davy; Ilko Stoytchev; Stefan Moisyadi; Rich Allsopp
Journal:  Mol Ther Nucleic Acids       Date:  2013-12-10       Impact factor: 10.183

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.