AIM: We explored the association of relatively low concentrations of metals in the soil proximal to maternal residence during pregnancy, with intellectual disability. We hypothesized different metals would be associated with mild versus severe intellectual disability. METHOD: We used a mixed methods design, starting with a retrospective cohort from 1996 to 2002, of 10,051 pregnant mothers, soil sampling in the areas where these mothers resided during pregnancy, and follow-up of their children to determine if there was an intellectual disability outcome. We tested the soil and then predicted the soil concentration at the maternal homes, and modeled the association with the severity of the child's intellectual disability. RESULTS: We found a significant positive association between mild intellectual disability and soil mercury (p=0.007). For severe intellectual disability, there was a significant positive association with the soil arsenic and lead (p=0.025). INTERPRETATION: This is the first report of the differential impact of metals in soil and severity of intellectual disability in children. Soil mercury concentration in the area the mother lived during pregnancy is associated with significantly increased odds of mild intellectual disability; a combination of arsenic and lead is associated with significantly increased odds of severe intellectual disability. These associations are present when controlling for maternal, child, and neighborhood characteristics.
AIM: We explored the association of relatively low concentrations of metals in the soil proximal to maternal residence during pregnancy, with intellectual disability. We hypothesized different metals would be associated with mild versus severe intellectual disability. METHOD: We used a mixed methods design, starting with a retrospective cohort from 1996 to 2002, of 10,051 pregnant mothers, soil sampling in the areas where these mothers resided during pregnancy, and follow-up of their children to determine if there was an intellectual disability outcome. We tested the soil and then predicted the soil concentration at the maternal homes, and modeled the association with the severity of the child's intellectual disability. RESULTS: We found a significant positive association between mild intellectual disability and soil mercury (p=0.007). For severe intellectual disability, there was a significant positive association with the soil arsenic and lead (p=0.025). INTERPRETATION: This is the first report of the differential impact of metals in soil and severity of intellectual disability in children. Soil mercury concentration in the area the mother lived during pregnancy is associated with significantly increased odds of mild intellectual disability; a combination of arsenic and lead is associated with significantly increased odds of severe intellectual disability. These associations are present when controlling for maternal, child, and neighborhood characteristics.
Authors: Philip W Davidson; Gary J Myers; Bernard Weiss; Conrad F Shamlaye; Christopher Cox Journal: Neurotoxicology Date: 2006-04-15 Impact factor: 4.294
Authors: Leticia Carrizales; Israel Razo; Jesús I Téllez-Hernández; Rocío Torres-Nerio; Arturo Torres; Lilia E Batres; Ana-Cristina Cubillas; Fernando Díaz-Barriga Journal: Environ Res Date: 2005-09-19 Impact factor: 6.498
Authors: P A Baghurst; A J McMichael; N R Wigg; G V Vimpani; E F Robertson; R J Roberts; S L Tong Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 1992-10-29 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: G A Wasserman; X Liu; N J Lolacono; P Factor-Litvak; J K Kline; D Popovac; N Morina; A Musabegovic; N Vrenezi; S Capuni-Paracka; V Lekic; E Preteni-Redjepi; S Hadzialjevic; V Slavkovich; J H Graziano Journal: Environ Health Perspect Date: 1997-09 Impact factor: 9.031
Authors: Bruce P Lanphear; Richard Hornung; Jane Khoury; Kimberly Yolton; Peter Baghurst; David C Bellinger; Richard L Canfield; Kim N Dietrich; Robert Bornschein; Tom Greene; Stephen J Rothenberg; Herbert L Needleman; Lourdes Schnaas; Gail Wasserman; Joseph Graziano; Russell Roberts Journal: Environ Health Perspect Date: 2005-07 Impact factor: 9.031
Authors: Harley T Davis; C Marjorie Aelion; Jihong Liu; James B Burch; Bo Cai; Andrew B Lawson; Suzanne McDermott Journal: Sci Total Environ Date: 2016-02-18 Impact factor: 7.963
Authors: Abraham Reichenberg; Martin Cederlöf; Andrew McMillan; Maciej Trzaskowski; Ori Kapra; Eyal Fruchter; Karen Ginat; Michael Davidson; Mark Weiser; Henrik Larsson; Robert Plomin; Paul Lichtenstein Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2015-12-28 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Shanshan Zhou; Sarah E Luoma; Genevieve E St Armour; Esha Thakkar; Trudy F C Mackay; Robert R H Anholt Journal: PLoS Genet Date: 2017-07-21 Impact factor: 5.917
Authors: Paloma I Beamer; Walter T Klimecki; Miranda Loh; Yoshira Ornelas Van Horne; Anastasia J Sugeng; Nathan Lothrop; Dean Billheimer; Stefano Guerra; Robert Clark Lantz; Robert A Canales; Fernando D Martinez Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2016-05-23 Impact factor: 3.390