Literature DB >> 24749864

Redesigning photo-ID to improve unfamiliar face matching performance.

David White1, A Mike Burton2, Rob Jenkins3, Richard I Kemp1.   

Abstract

Viewers find it difficult to match photos of unfamiliar faces for identity. Despite this, the use of photographic ID is widespread. In this study we ask whether it is possible to improve face matching performance by replacing single photographs on ID documents with multiple photos or an average image of the bearer. In 3 experiments we compare photo-to-photo matching with photo-to-average matching (where the average is formed from multiple photos of the same person) and photo-to-array matching (where the array comprises separate photos of the same person). We consistently find an accuracy advantage for average images and photo arrays over single photos, and show that this improvement is driven by performance in match trials. In the final experiment, we find a benefit of 4-image arrays relative to average images for unfamiliar faces, but not for familiar faces. We propose that conventional photo-ID format can be improved, and discuss this finding in the context of face recognition more generally. PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2014 APA, all rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24749864     DOI: 10.1037/xap0000009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Appl        ISSN: 1076-898X


  12 in total

1.  The pairs training effect in unfamiliar face matching.

Authors:  Kay L Ritchie; Tessa R Flack; Elizabeth A Fuller; Charlotte Cartledge; Robin S S Kramer
Journal:  Perception       Date:  2022-05-17       Impact factor: 1.695

2.  Face matching in a long task: enforced rest and desk-switching cannot maintain identification accuracy.

Authors:  Hamood M Alenezi; Markus Bindemann; Matthew C Fysh; Robert A Johnston
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2015-08-18       Impact factor: 2.984

3.  Effects of exposure to facial expression variation in face learning and recognition.

Authors:  Chang Hong Liu; Wenfeng Chen; James Ward
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2014-11-15

4.  Dynamic Emotional Faces Generalise Better to a New Expression but not to a New View.

Authors:  Chang Hong Liu; Wenfeng Chen; James Ward; Nozomi Takahashi
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-08-08       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  The utility of multiple synthesized views in the recognition of unfamiliar faces.

Authors:  Scott P Jones; Dominic M Dwyer; Michael B Lewis
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)       Date:  2016-03-24       Impact factor: 2.143

6.  Improving face identification with specialist teams.

Authors:  Tarryn Balsdon; Stephanie Summersby; Richard I Kemp; David White
Journal:  Cogn Res Princ Implic       Date:  2018-06-27

7.  Person identification from aerial footage by a remote-controlled drone.

Authors:  Markus Bindemann; Matthew C Fysh; Sophie S K Sage; Kristina Douglas; Hannah M Tummon
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-10-19       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Feature instructions improve face-matching accuracy.

Authors:  Ahmed M Megreya; Markus Bindemann
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-03-15       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  More than a sum of parts: robust face recognition by integrating variation.

Authors:  Nadia Menon; Richard I Kemp; David White
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2018-05-30       Impact factor: 2.963

10.  View specific generalisation effects in face recognition: Front and yaw comparison views are better than pitch.

Authors:  Simone Favelle; Stephen Palmisano
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-12-28       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.