Literature DB >> 24748611

Bony Landmarks of the Anterior Cruciate Ligament Tibial Footprint: A Detailed Analysis Comparing 3-Dimensional Computed Tomography Images to Visual and Histological Evaluations.

Keiji Tensho1, Hiroki Shimodaira1, Tetsuhiro Aoki1, Nobuyo Narita1, Hiroyuki Kato1, Akira Kakegawa2, Nanae Fukushima2, Tetsuji Moriizumi2, Masahiro Fujii3, Yasunari Fujinaga4, Naoto Saito5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Although the importance of tibial tunnel position for achieving stability after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction was recently recognized, there are fewer detailed reports of the anatomy of the tibial topographic footprint compared with the femoral side. HYPOTHESIS: The ACL tibial footprint has a relationship to bony prominences and surrounding bony landmarks. STUDY
DESIGN: Descriptive laboratory study.
METHODS: This study consisted of 2 anatomic procedures for the identification of bony prominences that correspond to the ACL tibial footprint and 3 surrounding landmarks: the anterior ridge, lateral groove, and intertubercular fossa. In the first procedure, after computed tomography (CT) was performed on 12 paired, embalmed cadaveric knees, 12 knees were visually observed, while their contralateral knees were histologically observed. Comparisons were made between macroscopic and microscopic findings and 3-dimensional (3D) CT images of these bony landmarks. In the second procedure, the shape of the bony prominence and incidence of their bony landmarks were evaluated from the preoperative CT data of 60 knee joints.
RESULTS: In the first procedure, we were able to confirm a bony prominence and all 3 surrounding landmarks by CT in all cases. Visual evaluation confirmed a small bony eminence at the anterior boundary of the ACL. The lateral groove was not confirmed macroscopically. The ACL was not attached to the lateral intercondylar tubercle, ACL tibial ridge, and intertubercular space at the posterior boundary. Histological evaluation confirmed that the anterior ridge and lateral groove were positioned at the anterior and lateral boundaries, respectively. There was no ligament tissue on the intercondylar space corresponding to the intercondylar fossa. In the second investigation, the bony prominence showed 2 morphological patterns: an oval type (58.3%) and a triangular type (41.6%). The 3 bony landmarks, including the anterior ridge, lateral groove, and intertubercular fossa, existed in 96.6%, 100.0%, and 96.6% of the cases, respectively.
CONCLUSION: There is a bony prominence corresponding to the ACL footprint and bony landmarks on the anterior, posterior, and lateral boundaries. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The study results may help create an accurate and reproducible tunnel, which is essential for successful ACL reconstruction surgery.
© 2014 The Author(s).

Keywords:  3-dimensional computed tomography; anterior cruciate ligament; bony landmark; tibial footprint

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24748611     DOI: 10.1177/0363546514528789

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Sports Med        ISSN: 0363-5465            Impact factor:   6.202


  29 in total

1.  Histological analysis of the tibial anterior cruciate ligament insertion.

Authors:  Shinya Oka; Peter Schuhmacher; Axel Brehmer; Ulrike Traut; Joachim Kirsch; Rainer Siebold
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2015-12-19       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Variation in the shape of the tibial insertion site of the anterior cruciate ligament: classification is required.

Authors:  Daniel Guenther; Sebastian Irarrázaval; Yuichiro Nishizawa; Cara Vernacchia; Eric Thorhauer; Volker Musahl; James J Irrgang; Freddie H Fu
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2015-12-12       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  Predicting anatomical landmarks and bone morphology of the femur using local region matching.

Authors:  Cong-Bo Phan; Seungbum Koo
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2015-02-12       Impact factor: 2.924

4.  Anatomic ACL reconstruction: the normal central tibial footprint position and a standardised technique for measuring tibial tunnel location on 3D CT.

Authors:  B Parkinson; R Gogna; C Robb; P Thompson; T Spalding
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2015-07-01       Impact factor: 4.342

5.  [Anatomical and finite element analysis of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction within biomechanical insertion].

Authors:  J H Zhang; S Ren; J Y Shao; X Y Niu; X Q Hu; Y F Ao
Journal:  Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban       Date:  2019-06-18

6.  Tibial Tunnel Positioning Technique Using Bony/Anatomical Landmarks in Anatomical Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.

Authors:  Hiroki Shimodaira; Keiji Tensho; Yusuke Akaoka; Seiji Takanashi; Hiroyuki Kato; Naoto Saito
Journal:  Arthrosc Tech       Date:  2017-01-09

7.  Anatomical rectangular tunnels identified with the arthroscopic landmarks result in excellent outcomes in ACL reconstruction with a BTB graft.

Authors:  Yuta Tachibana; Konsei Shino; Tatsuo Mae; Ryo Iuchi; Yasuhiro Take; Shigeto Nakagawa
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2018-11-20       Impact factor: 4.342

8.  The effect of feedback from post-operative 3D CT on placement of femoral tunnels in single-bundle anatomic ACL reconstruction.

Authors:  Eivind Inderhaug; Allan Larsen; Torbjørn Strand; Per Arne Waaler; Eirik Solheim
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2014-10-02       Impact factor: 4.342

9.  Combination of anterior tibial and femoral tunnels makes the signal intensity of antero-medial graft higher in double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Daisuke Chiba; Yuji Yamamoto; Yuka Kimura; Shizuka Sasaki; Eiichi Tsuda; Yasuyuki Ishibashi
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2020-04-29       Impact factor: 4.342

10.  Quantitative comparison of the microscopic anatomy of the human ACL femoral and tibial entheses.

Authors:  Mélanie L Beaulieu; Grace E Carey; Stephen H Schlecht; Edward M Wojtys; James A Ashton-Miller
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2015-07-14       Impact factor: 3.494

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.