| Literature DB >> 24748530 |
Olivier Girard1, Sébastien Racinais.
Abstract
PURPOSE: This study investigated the isolated and combined effects of heat [temperate (22 °C/30 % rH) vs. hot (35 °C/40 % rH)] and hypoxia [sea level (FiO2 0.21) vs. moderate altitude (FiO2 0.15)] on exercise capacity and neuromuscular fatigue characteristics.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2014 PMID: 24748530 PMCID: PMC4048668 DOI: 10.1007/s00421-014-2883-0
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Eur J Appl Physiol ISSN: 1439-6319 Impact factor: 3.078
Fig. 1Protocol overview. General procedure (a) and neuromuscular assessment procedure (b). Tcore core temperature, Tskin skin temperature, HR heart rate, SpO arterial saturation percentage, RPE rating of perceived exertion, [La] blood lactate concentration, MVC maximal isometric voluntary contraction torque of plantar flexors. Straight arrows indicate the timing of motor nerve stimulations at submaximal (H-reflex, downwards arrow) or supra-maximal (M-wave, downwards arrow) intensities. Maximal H-reflex (H MAX) and M-wave (M MAX) were evoked on a relaxed muscle. The stimulation necessary to obtain H MAX at rest was superimposed to MVC to record H SUP. When supra-maximal stimulus was superimposed to MVC, superimposed M-wave (M SUP) and V-wave (V SUP) were recorded
Fig. 2Time to exhaustion in four different environmental conditions. CON temperate and sea level, HOT hot and sea level, HYP temperate and moderate altitude, H + H hot and moderate altitude. *P < 0.05. Temperature and altitude had a main effect (P < 0.05) on time to exhaustion
Effects of temperature [temperate (22 °C/30 % rH) vs. warm (35 °C/40 % rH)] and altitude [sea level (FiO2 0.21/simulated altitude ~0 m) vs. moderate altitude (FiO2 0.15/simulated altitude ~2,500 m)] on the rate of change in exercise responses
| Temperature | Altitude | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Temperate | Warm | Sea level | Moderate altitude | |
| Tcore (°C/min) | 0.030 ± 0.002 | 0.050 ± 0.005* | 0.037 ± 0.004 | 0.043 ± 0.004 |
| Tskin (°C/min) | 0.042 ± 0.008 | 0.035 ± 0.005 | 0.034 ± 0.005 | 0.043 ± 0.006 |
| HR (beats/min) | 1.468 ± 0.196 | 2.382 ± 0.242* | 1.423 ± 0.202 | 2.427 ± 0.239# |
| SpO2 (%/min) | −0.085 ± 0.029 | −0.117 ± 0.068 | −0.013 ± 0.010 | −0.189 ± 0.075# |
| RPE (point/min) | 0.269 ± 0.037 | 0.426 ± 0.048* | 0.249 ± 0.037 | 0.445 ± 0.045# |
Values are expressed as mean ± SEM
Tcore core temperature, Tskin skin temperature, HR heart rate, SpO arterial oxygen saturation, RPE rating of perceived exertion
* P < 0.05; significantly higher in warm than in temperate conditions (temperature main effect)
# P < 0.05; significantly higher in moderate altitude than in sea level conditions (altitude main effect)
Fig. 3Exercise responses in four different environmental conditions. CON temperate and sea level, HOT hot and sea level, HYP temperate and moderate altitude, H + H hot and moderate altitude. See text for details. At the onset of exercise, HR and Tskin were higher (P < 0.05) in warm conditions, whereas altitude exposure reduced SpO2 and increased HR (both P < 0.05). Warm environments increased Tskin and HR at exhaustion (P < 0.05), whereas SpO2 (P < 0.05) was lowered with altitude exposure. The rate of rise in Tcore, HR and RPE was speeded under warm conditions (P < 0.05), whereas the rate of HR and RPE increase and SpO2 decrease was faster with altitude exposure (both P < 0.05). There was no interaction effect between temperature and altitude on either parameter
Fig. 4Maximal isometric voluntary contraction torque of plantar flexors (PF MVC torque, a), voluntary activation (twitch interpolation technique, b) and peak twitch torque (Pt, c) before (pre-tests) and after (post-tests) cycling to exhaustion in various conditions. CON temperate and sea level, HOT hot and sea level, HYP temperate and moderate altitude, H + H hot and moderate altitude.*P < 0.05, significantly different from pre-tests. There was neither a main effect of temperature or altitude nor any interaction between temperature and altitude on either parameter
EMG-related variables assessed before (pre-tests) and after (post-tests) cycling to exhaustion in various conditions
| Pre-tests | Post-tests | ANOVA | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control | Hot | Hypoxia | Hot + hypoxia | Control | Hot | Hypoxia | Hot + hypoxia | ||
| Rest | |||||||||
| | 8.75 ± 2.93 | 5.63 ± 1.56 | 7.20 ± 2.90 | 5.38 ± 2.05 | 8.25 ± 2.59 | 5.72 ± 1.47 | 7.07 ± 2.52 | 5.14 ± 2.04 |
|
| | 3.31 ± 2.15 | 3.37 ± 1.64 | 3.07 ± 2.06 | 2.23 ± 1.57 | 2.78 ± 2.14 | 1.89 ± 1.13 | 2.57 ± 1.76 | 1.96 ± 1.41 |
|
| | 38.3 ± 18.8 | 59.5 ± 24.2 | 41.2 ± 17.8 | 43.2 ± 31.3 | 32.4 ± 19.8 | 33.0 ± 17.9 | 36.9 ± 19.5 | 40.7 ± 37.6 |
|
| 20 % MVC | |||||||||
| | 8.88 ± 3.63 | 6.06 ± 1.74 | 7.53 ± 2.58 | 5.97 ± 2.40 | 8.59 ± 2.80 | 6.19 ± 2.12 | 7.26 ± 2.57 | 5.89 ± 2.04 |
|
| | 3.51 ± 2.24 | 2.76 ± 1.40 | 3.15 ± 1.91 | 2.44 ± 1.32 | 3.36 ± 2.31 | 2.72 ± 1.01 | 2.68 ± 1.89 | 2.40 ± 1.63 | |
| | 41.4 ± 18.5 | 43.6 ± 14.2 | 41.3 ± 16.0 | 43.8 ± 24.3 | 39.3 ± 22.8 | 45.0 ± 12.4 | 38.0 ± 23.1 | 39.5 ± 27.0 | |
| 100 % MVC | |||||||||
| | 9.73 ± 2.73 | 6.36 ± 1.64 | 7.76 ± 2.57 | 5.93 ± 1.95 | 8.21 ± 2.57 | 7.21 ± 2.41 | 7.97 ± 2.60 | 6.28 ± 2.17 |
|
| | 3.99 ± 2.00 | 2.79 ± 1.40 | 3.10 ± 1.43 | 2.92 ± 1.52 | 4.34 ± 1.82 | 3.46 ± 1.03 | 3.30 ± 1.54 | 3.06 ± 1.26 | |
| | 39.4 ± 11.1 | 42.1 ± 18.1 | 42.9 ± 20.6 | 50.7 ± 23.5 | 51.7 ± 13.6 | 49.9 ± 15.6 | 42.7 ± 19.0 | 50.9 ± 21.8 | |
| | 2.35 ± 1.79 | 1.61 ± 0.81 | 1.98 ± 0.92 | 1.72 ± 0.70 | 2.11 ± 1.27 | 1.58 ± 0.89 | 1.86 ± 1.02 | 1.53 ± 1.13 |
|
| | 22.2 ± 13.0 | 24.5 ± 11.1 | 25.7 ± 8.2 | 31.1 ± 14.3 | 24.9 ± 11.5 | 23.9 ± 17.8 | 23.8 ± 11.4 | 23.8 ± 14.4 | |
| RMS TA (mV) | 0.047 ± 0.018 | 0.043 ± 0.011 | 0.046 ± 0.013 | 0.043 ± 0.007 | 0.042 ± 0.016 | 0.039 ± 0.013 | 0.041 ± 0.012 | 0.037 ± 0.017 |
|
| RMS SOL (mV) | 0.287 ± 0.138 | 0.195 ± 0.070 | 0.254 ± 0.076 | 0.201 ± 0.080 | 0.261 ± 0.138 | 0.196 ± 0.077 | 0.233 ± 0.081 | 0.186 ± 0.070 |
|
| RMS/ | 0.029 ± 0.009 | 0.032 ± 0.010 | 0.035 ± 0.011 | 0.034 ± 0.007 | 0.033 ± 0.015 | 0.028 ± 0.008 | 0.030 ± 0.013 | 0.031 ± 0.013 | |
Values are expressed as mean ± SD. Subjects cycled to exhaustion in four different environmental conditions [temperate/sea level (control), warm/sea level (hot), temperate/moderate altitude (hypoxia) and warm/moderate altitude (hot + hypoxia)] in which temperature [temperate (22 °C/30 % rH) vs. warm (35 °C/40 % rH)] and altitude levels [sea level (FiO2 0.21/simulated altitude ~0 m) vs. moderate altitude (FiO2 0.15/simulated altitude ~2,500 m)] were set
There was neither a main effect of altitude nor any interaction between temperature and altitude on either parameter
M maximal resting M-wave, H maximal resting H-reflex, M maximal superimposed M-wave, H maximal superimposed H-reflex, V maximal superimposed V-wave, RMS TA tibialis anterior root mean square, RMS SOL soleus root mean square
E, P < 0.05; denote a significant main effect of exercise
T, P < 0.05; denote a significant main effect of temperature