Literature DB >> 24748465

Sequential combination of robot-assisted therapy and constraint-induced therapy in stroke rehabilitation: a randomized controlled trial.

Yu-Wei Hsieh1, Keh-Chung Lin, Yi-Shiung Horng, Ching-Yi Wu, Tai-Chieh Wu, Fang-Ling Ku.   

Abstract

Robot-assisted therapy (RT) and constraint-induced therapy (CIT) both show great promise to improve stroke rehabilitation outcomes. Although the respective treatment efficacy of RT and CIT has been validated, the additive effects of RT combined with CIT remain unknown. This study investigated the treatment effects of RT in sequential combination with a distributed form of CIT (RT + dCIT) compared with RT and conventional rehabilitation (CR). Forty-eight patients with stroke were enrolled and randomized to receive one of the three interventions for 4 weeks. Primary outcomes assessed the changes of motor impairment and motor function on the Fugl-Meyer Assessment (FMA) and Wolf Motor Function Test (WMFT). Secondary outcomes, including the Motor Activity Log (MAL) and accelerometers, examined functional performance during daily activities. The three treatment groups improved significantly on most primary and secondary outcomes over time. The combined RT + dCIT group exhibited significantly greater improvement on the FMA and functional ability subscale of the WMFT than the RT and CR groups. The improvements on the MAL and accelerometers were not significantly different among the three groups. RT in sequential combination with CIT led to additive effects on participants' motor ability and functional ability to perform motor tasks after stroke, which support that combined therapy can be an effective means to intensify outcomes. Further research investigating the potential long-term effects of combination therapy, especially on real-life performance, would be valuable.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24748465     DOI: 10.1007/s00415-014-7345-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurol        ISSN: 0340-5354            Impact factor:   4.849


  36 in total

1.  Reduced-intensity modified constraint-induced movement therapy versus conventional therapy for upper extremity rehabilitation after stroke: a multicenter trial.

Authors:  Nicola Smania; Marialuisa Gandolfi; Stefano Paolucci; Marco Iosa; Patrizia Ianes; Serena Recchia; Chiara Giovanzana; Franco Molteni; Renato Avesani; Pietro Di Paolo; Massimo Zaccala; Michela Agostini; Cristina Tassorelli; Antonio Fiaschi; Daniela Primon; Maria Grazia Ceravolo; Simona Farina
Journal:  Neurorehabil Neural Repair       Date:  2012-06-01       Impact factor: 3.919

Review 2.  Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy: a new family of techniques with broad application to physical rehabilitation--a clinical review.

Authors:  E Taub; G Uswatte; R Pidikiti
Journal:  J Rehabil Res Dev       Date:  1999-07

3.  What's new in stroke rehabilitation.

Authors:  Robert W Teasell; Lalit Kalra
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 7.914

Review 4.  What's new in new technologies for upper extremity rehabilitation?

Authors:  Sylvain Brochard; Johanna Robertson; Béatrice Médée; Olivier Rémy-Néris
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurol       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 5.710

5.  Translating animal doses of task-specific training to people with chronic stroke in 1-hour therapy sessions: a proof-of-concept study.

Authors:  Rebecca L Birkenmeier; Eliza M Prager; Catherine E Lang
Journal:  Neurorehabil Neural Repair       Date:  2010-04-27       Impact factor: 3.919

6.  Effects of robot-assisted upper limb rehabilitation on daily function and real-world arm activity in patients with chronic stroke: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Wan-Wen Liao; Ching-Yi Wu; Yu-Wei Hsieh; Keh-Chung Lin; Wan-Ying Chang
Journal:  Clin Rehabil       Date:  2011-08-12       Impact factor: 3.477

Review 7.  Effects of robot-assisted therapy on upper limb recovery after stroke: a systematic review.

Authors:  Gert Kwakkel; Boudewijn J Kollen; Hermano I Krebs
Journal:  Neurorehabil Neural Repair       Date:  2007-09-17       Impact factor: 3.919

8.  Reliability of the Fugl-Meyer assessment for testing motor performance in patients following stroke.

Authors:  J Sanford; J Moreland; L R Swanson; P W Stratford; C Gowland
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  1993-07

Review 9.  Progressive Staging of Pilot Studies to Improve Phase III Trials for Motor Interventions.

Authors:  Bruce H Dobkin
Journal:  Neurorehabil Neural Repair       Date:  2009 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.919

10.  Intensive sensorimotor arm training mediated by therapist or robot improves hemiparesis in patients with chronic stroke.

Authors:  Bruce T Volpe; Daniel Lynch; Avrielle Rykman-Berland; Mark Ferraro; Michael Galgano; Neville Hogan; Hermano I Krebs
Journal:  Neurorehabil Neural Repair       Date:  2008-01-09       Impact factor: 3.919

View more
  13 in total

1.  Breaking Proportional Recovery After Stroke.

Authors:  Merav R Senesh; David J Reinkensmeyer
Journal:  Neurorehabil Neural Repair       Date:  2019-08-16       Impact factor: 3.919

Review 2.  Electromechanical-assisted training for walking after stroke.

Authors:  Jan Mehrholz; Simone Thomas; Cordula Werner; Joachim Kugler; Marcus Pohl; Bernhard Elsner
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2017-05-10

3.  Generalizability of Results from Randomized Controlled Trials in Post-Stroke Physiotherapy.

Authors:  Matteo Paci; Claudia Prestera; Francesco Ferrarello
Journal:  Physiother Can       Date:  2020-11-01       Impact factor: 1.037

Review 4.  Electromechanical and robot-assisted arm training for improving activities of daily living, arm function, and arm muscle strength after stroke.

Authors:  Jan Mehrholz; Marcus Pohl; Thomas Platz; Joachim Kugler; Bernhard Elsner
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2018-09-03

Review 5.  Combinations of stroke neurorehabilitation to facilitate motor recovery: perspectives on Hebbian plasticity and homeostatic metaplasticity.

Authors:  Naoyuki Takeuchi; Shin-Ichi Izumi
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2015-06-23       Impact factor: 3.169

6.  Efficacy of robot-assisted fingers training in chronic stroke survivors: a pilot randomized-controlled trial.

Authors:  Evan A Susanto; Raymond Ky Tong; Corinna Ockenfeld; Newmen Sk Ho
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2015-04-25       Impact factor: 4.262

Review 7.  Hand Rehabilitation Robotics on Poststroke Motor Recovery.

Authors:  Zan Yue; Xue Zhang; Jing Wang
Journal:  Behav Neurol       Date:  2017-11-02       Impact factor: 3.342

Review 8.  Electromechanical and robot-assisted arm training for improving activities of daily living, arm function, and arm muscle strength after stroke.

Authors:  Jan Mehrholz; Marcus Pohl; Thomas Platz; Joachim Kugler; Bernhard Elsner
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2015-11-07

9.  Neuroplastic changes in resting-state functional connectivity after stroke rehabilitation.

Authors:  Yang-Teng Fan; Ching-Yi Wu; Ho-Ling Liu; Keh-Chung Lin; Yau-Yau Wai; Yao-Liang Chen
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2015-10-05       Impact factor: 3.169

10.  Sequencing bilateral robot-assisted arm therapy and constraint-induced therapy improves reach to press and trunk kinematics in patients with stroke.

Authors:  Yu-wei Hsieh; Rong-jiuan Liing; Keh-chung Lin; Ching-yi Wu; Tsan-hon Liou; Jui-chi Lin; Jen-wen Hung
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2016-03-22       Impact factor: 4.262

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.