Literature DB >> 24748047

Feasibility and safety of intracoronary nicorandil infusion as a novel hyperemic agent for fractional flow reserve measurements.

Daiki Kato1, Hiroaki Takashima, Katsuhisa Waseda, Akiyoshi Kurita, Yasuo Kuroda, Takashi Kosaka, Yasushi Kuhara, Hirohiko Ando, Kazuyuki Maeda, Soichiro Kumagai, Shinichiro Sakurai, Akihiro Suzuki, Yukiko Toda, Atsushi Watanabe, Shigeko Sato, Masanobu Fujimoto, Tomofumi Mizuno, Tetsuya Amano.   

Abstract

Fractional flow reserve (FFR) is a useful modality to assess the functional significance of coronary stenoses. Although adenosine triphosphate (ATP) is generally used as the hyperemic stimulus, we sometimes encounter adverse events like hypotension during FFR measurement. Nicorandil, an ATP-sensitive potassium channel opener, recognized as an epicardial and resistance vessel dilator, has not been fully evaluated as a possible alternative hyperemic agent. The aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility and safety of intracoronary nicorandil infusion compared to intravenous ATP for FFR measurement in patients with coronary artery disease. A total of 102 patients with 124 intermediate lesions (diameter stenosis >40 and <70% by visual assessment) were enrolled. All vessels underwent FFR measurements with both ATP (150 μg/kg/min) and nicorandil (2.0 mg) stimulus. FFR, hemodynamic values, and periprocedural adverse events between the two groups were evaluated. A strong correlation was observed between FFR with ATP and FFR with nicorandil (r = 0.954, p < 0.001). The agreement between the two sets of measurements was also high, with a mean difference of 0.01 ± 0.03. The mean aortic pressure drop during pharmacological stimulus was significantly larger with ATP compared to nicorandil (9.6 ± 9.6 vs. 5.5 ± 5.8 mmHg, p < 0.001). During FFR measurement, transient atrioventricular block was frequently observed with ATP compared to nicorandil (4.0 vs. 0%, p = 0.024). This study suggests that intracoronary nicorandil infusion is associated with clinical utility and safety compared to ATP as an alternative hyperemic agent for FFR measurement.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24748047     DOI: 10.1007/s00380-014-0508-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Heart Vessels        ISSN: 0910-8327            Impact factor:   2.037


  24 in total

1.  Percutaneous coronary intervention of functionally nonsignificant stenosis: 5-year follow-up of the DEFER Study.

Authors:  Nico H J Pijls; Pepijn van Schaardenburgh; Ganesh Manoharan; Eric Boersma; Jan-Willem Bech; Marcel van't Veer; Frits Bär; Jan Hoorntje; Jacques Koolen; William Wijns; Bernard de Bruyne
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2007-05-17       Impact factor: 24.094

2.  Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement.

Authors:  J M Bland; D G Altman
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1986-02-08       Impact factor: 79.321

3.  Cardioprotection in the clinical setting-lessons from J-WIND studies.

Authors:  Masanori Asakura; Masafumi Kitakaze
Journal:  Cardiovasc Drugs Ther       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 3.727

4.  Comparison of the effects of nitroprusside versus nicorandil on the slow/no-reflow phenomenon during coronary interventions for acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Renpei Kobatake; Tetsuya Sato; Yasukazu Fujiwara; Haruki Sunami; Ryo Yoshioka; Tetsuya Ikeda; Hironori Saito; Toru Ujihira
Journal:  Heart Vessels       Date:  2010-11-26       Impact factor: 2.037

5.  Maximal hyperemia in the assessment of fractional flow reserve: intracoronary adenosine versus intracoronary sodium nitroprusside versus intravenous adenosine: the NASCI (Nitroprussiato versus Adenosina nelle Stenosi Coronariche Intermedie) study.

Authors:  Antonio Maria Leone; Italo Porto; Alberto Ranieri De Caterina; Eloisa Basile; Andrea Aurelio; Andrea Gardi; Dolores Russo; Domenico Laezza; Giampaolo Niccoli; Francesco Burzotta; Carlo Trani; Mario Attilio Mazzari; Rocco Mongiardo; Antonio Giuseppe Rebuzzi; Filippo Crea
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 11.195

6.  Effect of nicorandil on coronary events in patients with stable angina: the Impact Of Nicorandil in Angina (IONA) randomised trial.

Authors: 
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2002-04-13       Impact factor: 79.321

7.  Effects of nicorandil on cardiovascular events in patients with coronary artery disease in the Japanese Coronary Artery Disease (JCAD) study.

Authors:  Shigeo Horinaka; Akihisa Yabe; Hiroshi Yagi; Toshihiko Ishimitsu; Tsutomu Yamazaki; Shinya Suzuki; Takahide Kohro; Ryozo Nagai
Journal:  Circ J       Date:  2010-01-18       Impact factor: 2.993

8.  Comparison of efficacy and safety of intracoronary sodium nitroprusside and intravenous adenosine for assessing fractional flow reserve.

Authors:  Wojciech Rudzinski; Alfonso H Waller; Arthur Rusovici; Abed Dehnee; Ali Nasur; Michael Benz; Salvador Sanchez; Marc Klapholz; Edo Kaluski
Journal:  Catheter Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2012-10-15       Impact factor: 2.692

9.  Coronary hyperemic dose responses of intracoronary sodium nitroprusside.

Authors:  Walter A Parham; Andre Bouhasin; Jeffrey P Ciaramita; Souheil Khoukaz; Steven C Herrmann; Morton J Kern
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2004-03-01       Impact factor: 29.690

10.  Repeated occurrence of slow flow phenomenon during and late after sirolimus-eluting stent implantation.

Authors:  Kenji Sakata; Masanobu Namura; Toshimitsu Takagi; Naoto Tama; Isao Inoki; Hidenobu Terai; Yuki Horita; Masatoshi Ikeda; Masakazu Yamagishi
Journal:  Heart Vessels       Date:  2014-01-30       Impact factor: 2.037

View more
  7 in total

1.  Fractional flow reserve-guided percutaneous coronary intervention for an intermediate stenosis complicated by a coronary-to-pulmonary artery fistula.

Authors:  Tsuyoshi Ito; Shunsuke Murai; Hiroshi Fujita; Tomomitsu Tani; Nobuyuki Ohte
Journal:  Heart Vessels       Date:  2015-02-03       Impact factor: 2.037

2.  A lotus root-like appearance in both the left anterior descending and right coronary arteries.

Authors:  Hiromu Kadowaki; Eiji Taguchi; Yoshihiro Kotono; Hiroto Suzuyama; Masayoshi Yoshida; Shinzo Miyamoto; Tomohiro Sakamoto; Kazuhiro Nishigami; Koichi Nakao
Journal:  Heart Vessels       Date:  2014-08-21       Impact factor: 2.037

3.  Preventive effect of oral nicorandil on contrast-induced nephropathy in patients with renal insufficiency undergoing elective cardiac catheterization.

Authors:  Yanming Fan; Qingmin Wei; Junna Cai; Yongtang Shi; Youliang Zhang; Limei Yao; Xiaogang Wang; Shupo Lin; Yilin Li; Jing Lv; Bin Zhou; Ruijuan Du
Journal:  Heart Vessels       Date:  2016-02-13       Impact factor: 2.037

4.  Impacts of nicorandil on infarct myocardium in comparison with nitrate: assessed by cardiac magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Kiyoyasu Yamada; Satoshi Isobe; Hideki Ishii; Kazuhiko Yokouchi; Hirokazu Iwata; Ken Sawada; Toyoaki Murohara
Journal:  Heart Vessels       Date:  2015-11-03       Impact factor: 2.037

5.  Efficacy of intravenous nicorandil for fractional flow reserve assessment: study protocol for a crossover randomised trial.

Authors:  Takeshi Nishi; Hideki Kitahara; Yoshihide Fujimoto; Takashi Nakayama; Kazumasa Sugimoto; Kengo Nagashima; Hideki Hanaoka; Yoshio Kobayashi
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2016-11-21       Impact factor: 2.692

6.  The guiding value of hybrid resting full-cycle ratio and fractional flow reserve strategy for percutaneous coronary intervention in a Chinese real-world cohort with non-ST elevation acute coronary syndrome.

Authors:  Yumeng Lei; Shuaiyong Zhang; Mengyao Li; Jiawang Wang; Yunfei Wang; Lei Zhao; Wei Yan; Ming Chen; Yanjie Su; Jing Yu; Na Yu; Tongjun Dong; Xufen Cao; Liqiu Yan
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2022-09-07

Review 7.  Physiologic Assessment of Coronary Artery Disease: Focus on Fractional Flow Reserve.

Authors:  Doyeon Hwang; Joo Myung Lee; Bon-Kwon Koo
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2016-04-14       Impact factor: 3.500

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.