Literature DB >> 24747818

Quantitative optical microscopy: measurement of cellular biophysical features with a standard optical microscope.

Kevin G Phillips1, Sandra M Baker-Groberg2, Owen J T McCarty3.   

Abstract

We describe the use of a standard optical microscope to perform quantitative measurements of mass, volume, and density on cellular specimens through a combination of bright field and differential interference contrast imagery. Two primary approaches are presented: noninterferometric quantitative phase microscopy (NIQPM), to perform measurements of total cell mass and subcellular density distribution, and Hilbert transform differential interference contrast microscopy (HTDIC) to determine volume. NIQPM is based on a simplified model of wave propagation, termed the paraxial approximation, with three underlying assumptions: low numerical aperture (NA) illumination, weak scattering, and weak absorption of light by the specimen. Fortunately, unstained cellular specimens satisfy these assumptions and low NA illumination is easily achieved on commercial microscopes. HTDIC is used to obtain volumetric information from through-focus DIC imagery under high NA illumination conditions. High NA illumination enables enhanced sectioning of the specimen along the optical axis. Hilbert transform processing on the DIC image stacks greatly enhances edge detection algorithms for localization of the specimen borders in three dimensions by separating the gray values of the specimen intensity from those of the background. The primary advantages of NIQPM and HTDIC lay in their technological accessibility using "off-the-shelf" microscopes. There are two basic limitations of these methods: slow z-stack acquisition time on commercial scopes currently abrogates the investigation of phenomena faster than 1 frame/minute, and secondly, diffraction effects restrict the utility of NIQPM and HTDIC to objects from 0.2 up to 10 (NIQPM) and 20 (HTDIC) μm in diameter, respectively. Hence, the specimen and its associated time dynamics of interest must meet certain size and temporal constraints to enable the use of these methods. Excitingly, most fixed cellular specimens are readily investigated with these methods.

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24747818      PMCID: PMC4162510          DOI: 10.3791/50988

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vis Exp        ISSN: 1940-087X            Impact factor:   1.355


  28 in total

1.  Spectral-domain optical coherence phase microscopy for quantitative phase-contrast imaging.

Authors:  Chulmin Joo; Taner Akkin; Barry Cense; Boris H Park; Johannes F de Boer
Journal:  Opt Lett       Date:  2005-08-15       Impact factor: 3.776

2.  Optical measurement of cell membrane tension.

Authors:  Gabriel Popescu; Takahiro Ikeda; Keisuke Goda; Catherine A Best-Popescu; Michael Laposata; Suliana Manley; Ramachandra R Dasari; Kamran Badizadegan; Michael S Feld
Journal:  Phys Rev Lett       Date:  2006-11-20       Impact factor: 9.161

3.  Cell refractive index tomography by digital holographic microscopy.

Authors:  Florian Charrière; Anca Marian; Frédéric Montfort; Jonas Kuehn; Tristan Colomb; Etienne Cuche; Pierre Marquet; Christian Depeursinge
Journal:  Opt Lett       Date:  2006-01-15       Impact factor: 3.776

4.  Tomographic phase microscopy.

Authors:  Wonshik Choi; Christopher Fang-Yen; Kamran Badizadegan; Seungeun Oh; Niyom Lue; Ramachandra R Dasari; Michael S Feld
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2007-08-12       Impact factor: 28.547

5.  Quantitative Carré differential interference contrast microscopy to assess phase and amplitude.

Authors:  Donald D Duncan; David G Fischer; Amanda Dayton; Scott A Prahl
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis       Date:  2011-06-01       Impact factor: 2.129

6.  Transport-of-intensity approach to differential interference contrast (TI-DIC) microscopy for quantitative phase imaging.

Authors:  Shan Shan Kou; Laura Waller; George Barbastathis; Colin J R Sheppard
Journal:  Opt Lett       Date:  2010-02-01       Impact factor: 3.776

7.  Optical measurement of cycle-dependent cell growth.

Authors:  Mustafa Mir; Zhuo Wang; Zhen Shen; Michael Bednarz; Rashid Bashir; Ido Golding; Supriya G Prasanth; Gabriel Popescu
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-07-25       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Measurement of single cell refractive index, dry mass, volume, and density using a transillumination microscope.

Authors:  Kevin G Phillips; Steven L Jacques; Owen J T McCarty
Journal:  Phys Rev Lett       Date:  2012-09-13       Impact factor: 9.161

9.  Scattering-phase theorem: anomalous diffraction by forward-peaked scattering media.

Authors:  Min Xu
Journal:  Opt Express       Date:  2011-10-24       Impact factor: 3.894

10.  Video image processing greatly enhances contrast, quality, and speed in polarization-based microscopy.

Authors:  S Inoué
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  1981-05       Impact factor: 10.539

View more
  6 in total

1.  A physical sciences network characterization of circulating tumor cell aggregate transport.

Authors:  Michael R King; Kevin G Phillips; Annachiara Mitrugno; Tae-Rin Lee; Adelaide M E de Guillebon; Siddarth Chandrasekaran; Matthew J McGuire; Russell T Carr; Sandra M Baker-Groberg; Rachel A Rigg; Anand Kolatkar; Madelyn Luttgen; Kelly Bethel; Peter Kuhn; Paolo Decuzzi; Owen J T McCarty
Journal:  Am J Physiol Cell Physiol       Date:  2015-03-18       Impact factor: 4.249

2.  The thrombotic potential of circulating tumor microemboli: computational modeling of circulating tumor cell-induced coagulation.

Authors:  Kevin G Phillips; Angela M Lee; Garth W Tormoen; Rachel A Rigg; Anand Kolatkar; Madelyn Luttgen; Kelly Bethel; Lyudmila Bazhenova; Peter Kuhn; Paul Newton; Owen J T McCarty
Journal:  Am J Physiol Cell Physiol       Date:  2014-11-19       Impact factor: 4.249

3.  Morphometric and Nanomechanical Features of Erythrocytes Characteristic of Early Pregnancy Loss.

Authors:  Ariana Langari; Velichka Strijkova; Regina Komsa-Penkova; Avgustina Danailova; Sashka Krumova; Stefka G Taneva; Ina Giosheva; Emil Gartchev; Kamelia Kercheva; Alexey Savov; Svetla Todinova
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2022-04-19       Impact factor: 6.208

4.  Effect of ionizing radiation on the physical biology of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma cells.

Authors:  Sandra M Baker-Groberg; Sophia Bornstein; Jevgenia Zilberman-Rudenko; Mark Schmidt; Garth W Tormoen; Casey Kernan; Charles R Thomas; Melissa H Wong; Kevin G Phillips; Owen J T McCarty
Journal:  Cell Mol Bioeng       Date:  2015-05-07       Impact factor: 2.321

5.  Critical behavior of subcellular density organization during neutrophil activation and migration.

Authors:  Sandra M Baker-Groberg; Kevin G Phillips; Laura D Healy; Asako Itakura; Juliana E Porter; Paul K Newton; Xiaolin Nan; Owen J T McCarty
Journal:  Cell Mol Bioeng       Date:  2015-06-03       Impact factor: 2.321

6.  Automated quantitative image analysis for ex vivo metastasis assays reveals differing lung composition requirements for metastasis suppression by KISS1.

Authors:  Eric D Young; Kyle Strom; Ashley F Tsue; Joseph L Usset; Seth MacPherson; John T McGuire; Danny R Welch
Journal:  Clin Exp Metastasis       Date:  2018-03-26       Impact factor: 5.150

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.