Although the past 15 years have witnessed the development of sterically bulky and electron-rich alkylphosphine ligands for palladium-catalyzed cross-couplings with aryl chlorides, examples of palladium catalysts based on either triarylphosphine or bidentate phosphine ligands for efficient room temperature cross-coupling reactions with unactivated aryl chlorides are rare. Herein we report a palladium catalyst based on NiXantphos, a deprotonatable chelating aryldiphosphine ligand, to oxidatively add unactivated aryl chlorides at room temperature. Surprisingly, comparison of an extensive array of ligands revealed that under the basic reaction conditions the resultant heterobimetallic Pd-NiXantphos catalyst system outperformed all the other mono- and bidentate ligands in a deprotonative cross-coupling process (DCCP) with aryl chlorides. The DCCP with aryl chlorides affords a variety of triarylmethane products, a class of compounds with various applications and interesting biological activity. Additionally, the DCCP exhibits remarkable chemoselectivity in the presence of aryl chloride substrates bearing heteroaryl groups and sensitive functional groups that are known to undergo 1,2-addition, aldol reaction, and O-, N-, enolate-α-, and C(sp(2))-H arylations. The advantages and importance of the Pd-NiXantphos catalyst system outlined herein make it a valuable contribution for applications in Pd-catalyzed arylation reactions with aryl chlorides.
Although the past 15 years have witnessed the development of sterically bulky and electron-rich alkylphosphine ligands for palladium-catalyzed cross-couplings with aryl chlorides, examples of palladiumcatalysts based on either triarylphosphine or bidentate phosphine ligands for efficient room temperature cross-coupling reactions with unactivated aryl chlorides are rare. Herein we report a palladiumcatalyst based on NiXantphos, a deprotonatable chelating aryldiphosphine ligand, to oxidatively add unactivated aryl chlorides at room temperature. Surprisingly, comparison of an extensive array of ligands revealed that under the basic reaction conditions the resultant heterobimetallicPd-NiXantphoscatalyst system outperformed all the other mono- and bidentate ligands in a deprotonative cross-coupling process (DCCP) with aryl chlorides. The DCCP with aryl chlorides affords a variety of triarylmethane products, a class of compounds with various applications and interesting biological activity. Additionally, the DCCP exhibits remarkable chemoselectivity in the presence of aryl chloride substrates bearing heteroaryl groups and sensitive functional groups that are known to undergo 1,2-addition, aldol reaction, and O-, N-, enolate-α-, and C(sp(2))-H arylations. The advantages and importance of the Pd-NiXantphoscatalyst system outlined herein make it a valuable contribution for applications in Pd-catalyzed arylation reactions with aryl chlorides.
The past 15 years have
witnessed the development of phosphine ligands used for palladium-catalyzed
cross-couplings with aryl chlorides.[1] Among
them, sterically bulky and electron-rich alkylphosphine ligands have
proved particularly successful and have been widely applied in synthesis.[2] Simple triarylphosphine ligands are generally
ineffective for oxidative addition of unactivated aryl chlorides to
Pd(0), in part due to their reduced electron-donating ability. Yet,
aryl chlorides are arguably the most useful substrates among aryl
halides and pseudohalides, because of their low cost and wide availability.
To date, few reports have documented the use of triarylphosphine ligands
for cross-couplings with unactivated aryl chlorides, most of which
require higher temperatures (≥60 °C), and typically give
moderate yields with narrow substrate scope.[3a−3i] In 2005, the Buchwald group reported that a sterically hindered
monodentate triarylphosphine ligand, 2-diphenylphosphino-2′,4′,6′-triisopropylbiphenyl,
promoted Suzuki–Miyaura couplings of aryl chlorides at room
temperature to 40 °C in excellent yields.[3j]Mechanistic studies on oxidative addition of aryl
chlorides to Pd(0) bearing bulky electron-rich phosphine ligands have
been recently reported: the Hartwig group, as well as others, demonstrated
that oxidative addition of aryl chlorides to Pd(0) proceeds through a
monoligated palladium species, LPd(0) (L = monodentate phosphine).[4] This mechanistic picture is consistent with the
inability of chelating phosphines to oxidatively add aryl chlorides
at low temperature. The two reasonable pathways for oxidative addition
of aryl chlorides with bidentate phosphines are dissociation of one
of the phosphoruscenters of a bidentate chelating phosphine or direct
oxidative addition without dissociation of a phosphoruscenter, both
of which are high in energy.[4e−4g] As a result, palladiumcomplexes
with chelating bidentate ligands typically catalyze cross-couplings
of unactivated aryl chlorides only at elevated temperatures.[5] In 1993, the Milstein group reported the oxidative
addition of aryl chlorides to Pd(P̂P), which was generated from
Pd(P̂P)2 [P̂P = a bidentate phosphine, in this
case, 1,3-bis(diisopropylphosphino)propane (dippp)].[6] Despite the bulky and strongly donating phosphoruscenters,
the oxidative addition was conducted at 90 °C to achieve complete
conversion in 2 h. In 2003, a similar observation was reported by
the Hartwig group for the room temperature oxidative addition of aryl
tosylates to Pd(P̂P)2 (P̂P = PPFt-Bu and CyPFt-Bu).[7] However, we
are not aware of examples of palladiumcatalysts based on bidentate phosphine ligands for efficient room temperature
cross-coupling reactions with unactivated aryl chlorides.Herein
we report unprecedented reactivity employing a deprotonatable
chelating aryldiphosphine ligand, NiXantphos,[8] for the room temperature palladium-catalyzed cross-coupling
reaction of unactivated aryl chlorides. Surprisingly, comparison of
an extensive array of ligands revealed that the heterobimetallic (M–NiXantphos)Pdcatalyst system (M = alkali metal)[9] outperformed
all the other mono- and bidentate ligands in deprotonative cross-coupling
reactions with aryl chlorides.
Results and Discussion
Initial Studies with NiXantphos
We recently initiated
a program in the catalytic functionalization of weakly acidic sp3-hybridized C–H bonds. We have categorized these reactions
as deprotonative cross-coupling processes (DCCP), because they involve
initial reversible deprotonation of the C–H by base without
the participation of the catalyst. The catalyst promotes the subsequent
functionalization of the deprotonated species. Thus, DCCP is mechanistically
distinct from C–H activation/functionalization processes.Substrates we reported to undergo DCCP include diarylmethanes, allyl
benzenes, sulfoxides, sulfones, amides and η6-arene
complexes of toluene derivatives and benzylic amines.[10−12] Diphenylmethane (pKa = 32.3[13]) and diarylmethane derivatives were arylated
at room temperature with aryl bromides in the presence
of KN(SiMe3)2 and a palladiumcatalyst bearing
van Leeuwen’s NiXantphos ligand[8] (eq 1, see Scheme 1 for the structure
of NiXantphos).[11a] This method facilitates
rapid access to a wide variety of sterically and electronically diverse
triarylmethanes, a class of compounds with various applications and
interesting biological activity.[14−18]
Scheme 1
Selected HTE Results of the Cross-Coupling of 1a with
1-Bromo-4-tert-butylbenzene (AY= assay yield)
HTE conducted on a 10 μmol
scale at 0.1 M.
Interestingly, when we examined various
ligands for the cross-coupling of diphenylmethane (1a) with 1-bromo-4-tert-butylbenzene at room temperature
using microscale high-throughput experimentation (HTE, Scheme 1),[19] the NiXantphos-based
catalyst showed superior performance over dippp as well as the other
bidentate ligands sharing similar bite angles (see Supporting Information [SI] for a complete list of ligands).[8] The NiXantphos-based catalyst also outperformed
monodentate alkylphosphine ligands. The dominance of NiXantphos over
the structurally similar Xantphos begged the question: Why is NiXantphos
so active under these reaction conditions? We hypothesized that the
presence of a somewhat acidic N–H moiety under the basic reaction
conditions would result in deprotonation and that the resultant heterobimetallic
system might exhibit cooperative reactivity. We then set out to determine
the validity of this hypothesis, starting with a deprotonation study.
Selected HTE Results of the Cross-Coupling of 1a with
1-Bromo-4-tert-butylbenzene (AY= assay yield)
HTE conducted on a 10 μmol
scale at 0.1 M.
Deprotonation
of NiXantphos
Solution Studies
NiXantphos has a phenoxazinecore, with a pKa around 22,[13] and should be deprotonated
by KN(SiMe3)2 under the reaction conditions
in Scheme 1. The 1H and 31P{1H} NMR spectra of NiXantphos were recorded in THF-d8 at room temperature before and after combination
with 1.5–6 equiv of MN(SiMe3)2 (M = Li,
K). After 1.5 equiv of MN(SiMe3)2 were added,
the 1H NMR spectrum of the resulting solution displayed
significant shifts in the phenoxazinehydrogens (Ha, Hb, and Hc, Table 1). A distinct upfield
shift, Δ, of −0.75 ppm of Ha was observed in the presence of 1.5 equiv of KN(SiMe3)2 (entry 2 vs 1). Similarly, Hc exhibited a smaller shift (Δ=–0.59 ppm) as did Hb (Δ=–0.46 ppm). 1H
NMR chemical shifts did not change upon further addition of KN(SiMe3)2 to NiXantphos (entries 3 and 4 vs 2). Similar
shifts were observed in the 1H NMR spectrum of the phenoxazinehydrogens of NiXantphos in the presence of 1.5 equiv of LiN(SiMe3)2 (entry 5). These observations indicated that
deprotonation was complete with 1.5 equiv of MN(SiMe3)2 (M = Li, K). Interestingly, only a very small shift was observed
in the 31P{1H} NMR spectra of the PPh2 moiety of NiXantphos after addition of MN(SiMe3)2 (Table 1), suggesting
(1) the countercation is not bound to the phosphoruscenters (also
see Figure 1a), and (2) the anionicphenoxazine
backbone does not render the phosphoruscenters significantly more
electron-rich (see section 2.2.2 for DFT calculations).
Table 1
1H and 31P{1H} NMR
Studies of NiXantphos Deprotonated by Basea
entry
base (equiv)
Ha
Hb
Hc
PPh2
1
none
5.91
6.52
6.32
–18.99
2
KN(SiMe3)2 (1.5)
5.16
6.06
5.73
–18.69
3
KN(SiMe3)2 (3)
5.14
6.03
5.70
–18.69
4
KN(SiMe3)2 (6)
5.15
6.04
5.70
–18.68
5
LiN(SiMe3)2 (1.5)
5.22
6.07
5.75
–18.45
Reactions conducted on a 0.04 mmol scale with 1 equiv of NiXantphos
and 1.5–6 equiv of MN(SiMe3)2 (M = Li,
K) in 0.75 mL of THF-d8 in a J. Young
NMR tube at room temperature, chemical shifts reported in ppm, referenced
to the proteo internal standard.
Figure 1
(a) ORTEP diagram
of [K(THF)3–NiXantphos]2 with 50% probability
thermal ellipsoids displayed. Hydrogen atoms omitted for clarity.
N1–K1 = 2.808(3) Å, N1–K1′ = 2.857(3) Å,
P1···P2 distance = 4.245 Å. (b) ORTEP diagram
of K(THF)(18-crown-6)–NiXantphos with 50% probability thermal
ellipsoids displayed. Hydrogen atoms omitted for clarity. N1–K1
= 2.885(2) Å, P1···P2 distance = 4.301 Å.
Reactions conducted on a 0.04 mmol scale with 1 equiv of NiXantphos
and 1.5–6 equiv of MN(SiMe3)2 (M = Li,
K) in 0.75 mL of THF-d8 in a J. Young
NMR tube at room temperature, chemical shifts reported in ppm, referenced
to the proteo internal standard.
DFT Calculations with NiXantphos and Related Bis(phosphines)
In reported work, the electron-donating ability of mono- and bidentate
phosphine ligands has been assessed using density functional theory
(DFT). For example, Spokoyny and Buchwald correlated computed partial
charges of B9-connected trivalent aryl and alkyl phosphinoboranes
with the electronic properties of their resulting carbonyl complexes.[20] In order to probe the experimental observations
for the Pd–NiXantphos system, DFT calculations were performed
to assess the electronic structures of the ligands. Gas-phase geometry
optimizations were performed at the B3LYP level of theory with the
6-31 G* basis set for all atoms using Gaussian ’09. Natural
bond orbital (NBO) analyses of the resulting structures afforded comparisons
of atomic natural charges (Table 2 and SI).
Table 2
DFT Calculated
Natural Charges for Members of the Xantphos Ligand Family and Relevant
Bidentate Phosphines
Computations for the five ligands:
neutral NiXantphos, the deprotonated NiXantphos anion, N-Bn NiXantphos, Xantphos, and DPEPhos, and three related bidentate
phosphines, P̂P = dippp, PPFt-Bu, and CyPFt-Bu, were performed. The results suggested that both the
phosphorus atoms and the oxygen atom in the deprotonated NiXantphos
anion exhibited natural charges comparable to those in the other four
structurally similar ligands (Table 2). In
particular, only small ranges of natural charges, qP = 0.918 to 0.930 and qO =
−0.499 to −0.517, were observed, suggesting the electronic
structure at the phosphorus and oxygen atoms is largely unchanged
upon deprotonation of NiXantphos.The calculations also suggested
the three alkyl-substituted bidentatephosphine ligands: P̂P,
PPFt-Bu, and CyPFt-Bu, were significantly
more electron-rich than the Xantphos family of ligands. Overall, the
calculations disfavor the possibility that the oxygen atom in the
deprotonated NiXantphos is electron-rich, suggesting it is not likely
to play a critical role in the oxidative addition of aryl chlorides
(see section 2.3).
Structures of Deprotonated
NiXantphos
We were curious how deprotonation would impact
the structure of the NiXantphos ligand and how the main group metal
would interact with the ligand framework. Bala and co-workers reported
the crystal structure of neutral NiXantphos, where the phenoxazine
is essentially planar.[21] We synthesized
the metalated ligand, K–NiXantphos by combination of 1 equiv
of NiXantphos with 1 equiv of KN(SiMe3)2 in
Et2O at room temperature under a nitrogen atmosphere. Upon
addition of KN(SiMe3)2, K–NiXantphos
rapidly precipitated from Et2O as a yellow solid, and was
isolated by vacuum filtration. 1H and 31P{1H} NMR spectra of the isolated K–NiXantphos in THF-d8 were identical to those obtained in situ from
combination of NiXantphos with KN(SiMe3)2 in
THF-d8 (Table 1, entry 3).We obtained diffraction-quality single crystals
of K–NiXantphos in the absence and presence of 18-crown-6 for a structural study. As illustrated
in Figure 1, [K(THF)3–NiXantphos]2 is a dimer in the solid state, and the deprotonated phenoxazine
ring exhibits a dihedral angle of 1.9° between the two benzo
groups, similar to that observed in neutral NiXantphos. The reddish-orange
crown ether adduct, K(THF)(18-crown-6)–NiXantphos, was found
to be a monomer in the solid state (Figure 1b). A change in geometry of the phenoxazine ring was observed with
deprotonation: a dihedral angle of 16.4° between the two benzo
rings. The K–N distances were 2.808(3) Å and 2.857(3)
Å in the dimer (Figure 1a), and 2.885(2)
Å in the monomer (Figure 1 b).(a) ORTEP diagram
of [K(THF)3–NiXantphos]2 with 50% probability
thermal ellipsoids displayed. Hydrogen atoms omitted for clarity.
N1–K1 = 2.808(3) Å, N1–K1′ = 2.857(3) Å,
P1···P2 distance = 4.245 Å. (b) ORTEP diagram
of K(THF)(18-crown-6)–NiXantphos with 50% probability thermal
ellipsoids displayed. Hydrogen atoms omitted for clarity. N1–K1
= 2.885(2) Å, P1···P2 distance = 4.301 Å.
Probing
NiXantphos N-Arylation
The above studies confirm that NiXantphos
is deprotonated in the presence of MN(SiMe3)2 (M = Li, K). Thus, under the DCCP reaction conditions (Scheme 1) we were concerned that the deprotonated NiXantphoscould be N-arylated via Buchwald–Hartwig amination
of aryl halides.[22] To address this concern,
we needed to displace the NiXantphos-derived products from palladium
after the DCCP. For this purpose, an excess of 1,2-bis(diethylphosphino)ethane
(depe), a more basic and stronger binding phosphine, was examined for
this ligand exchange/NiXantphos recovery experiment. As shown in Scheme 2A, palladium acetate was stirred with NiXantphos
for 12 h at room temperature, resulting in coordination of NiXantphos,
as determined by 31P{1H} NMR spectroscopy (see SI). Treatment of the complex with 8 equiv depe
followed by filtration over a pad of silica and flash chromatography
resulted in 88% recovered NiXantphos (Scheme 2A). In order to determine whether the deprotonated NiXantphos was N-arylated after the cross-coupling reaction with aryl bromide,
we performed the DCCP in Scheme 2B and then
carried out a ligand exchange/recovery procedure. We recovered 80%
of NiXantphos after flash chromatography (average of two runs). No N-arylated NiXantphos was observed (Scheme 2B), suggesting the catalyst does not undergo N-arylation.
Scheme 2
Ligand Exchange and Recovery of NiXantphos
Oxidative
Addition with Aryl Chlorides
On the basis of the studies
in sections 2.1 and 2.2, NiXantphos was deprotonated to generate the metalated ligand, K–NiXantphos,
but it was not N-arylated under the DCCP reaction
conditions. While the potassium atom was positioned away from the
oxygen and the phosphorus atoms in the solid-state structures, we
wondered if its presence could facilitate the activation of less reactive
aryl chlorides, either by cooperative reactivity with the palladium[9,23] or by an electrostatic effect caused by the presence of the charged
potassium and nitrogen atoms near the site of oxidative addition.[24] Such interactions could be envisioned to facilitate
oxidative additions with less reactive aryl chlorides. On the basis
of this supposition, we set out to study the oxidative addition of
chlorobenzene to our heterobimetalliccatalyst system.The oxidative
addition of aryl bromides to (Xantphos)Pd(dba) (dba = dibenzylideneacetone)
has been previously studied.[25] In these
studies, combination of 1 equiv of Pd(dba)2 (or 0.5 equiv
of Pd2dba3) with 1 equiv of Xantphos generated
(Xantphos)Pd(dba) in situ.[26] In the presence
of 4-bromobenzonitrile, this intermediate reacted at room temperature
to afford (Xantphos)Pd(4-C6H4CN)(Br) in 80%
yield.[25a] Higher temperature was required
(80 °C) for reaction with less reactive bromobenzene to afford
(Xantphos)Pd(C6H5)(Br).[25b] We used the same procedure for the oxidative addition studies
with chlorobenzene (2b, 5 equiv) to in situ-generated
(Xantphos)Pd(dba) and neutral (NiXantphos)Pd(dba) at 24 and 80 °C.
Under these conditions no oxidative addition products were detected.
These results suggested that Xantphos and neutral NiXantphos were
not effective ligands for oxidative addition of aryl chlorides to
palladium(0). We also mixed in situ-generated (NiXantphos)Pd(dba)
with 1 equiv of KN(SiMe3)2 and 5 equiv of chlorobenzene
(2b) at 24 °C, but the reaction gave multiple products,
as judged by 31P{1H} NMR spectroscopy, probably
because of interference with dba.The Buchwald group demonstrated
an oxidative addition of chlorobenzene to an LPd(0) (L = a monodentate
phosphine) complex, which was in situ-generated by combination of
their first-generation chloride precatalyst with 1 equiv of base.[27] Other groups also reported on palladacycles
used as precatalysts for cross-coupling reactions with aryl chlorides.[28] The Buchwald group recently reported their third-generation
precatalysts, wherein a dimeric2-aminobiphenylpalladium methanesulfonatecomplex can be treated with a range of phosphine ligands (including
sterically bulky ligands and bidentate ligands) to provide methanesulfonate
precatalysts.[29] To determine the reactivity
of our palladiumcatalyst system based on deprotonated NiXantphos
in the absence of dba, we combined 1 equiv of the methanesulfonate
precatalyst 4 (see eq 2 for the
structure) with 3.5 equiv of LiN(SiMe3)2 and
5 equiv of chlorobenzene 2b in THF at 24 °C (eq 2). We propose that the first equiv of LiN(SiMe3)2 deprotonates the NH2 moiety to induce
the reductive elimination affording carbazole and (NiXantphos)Pd(0).[27] The second and third equivalents of LiN(SiMe3)2 deprotonate carbazole (pKa = 19.9) and (NiXantphos)Pd(0) (pKa ≈ 22).[13] The room-temperature
oxidative addition of chlorobenzene reached about 75% conversion in
6 h and near completion in 24 h, as judged by a singlet at 2.6 ppm
in 31P{1H} NMR spectrum for the oxidative addition
product. The singlet is due to the rapid exchange between cis- and trans-chelation modes of the wide
bite angle NiXantphos ligand (114°)[8] in solution, as also observed with (Xantphos)Pd(Ar)(Br).[30] The oxidative addition product, (Li–NiXantphos)Pd(Ph)(Cl),
is generated along with byproducts lithium mesylate and lithium carbazoleate,
rendering the isolation of the Pd-containing product challenging (eq 2). Nevertheless, single crystals of the neutral (NiXantphos)Pd(Ph)(Cl)
were obtained by vapor diffusion of pentane into a concentrated THF
solution of the reaction mixture (Figure 2).
The solid-state structure shows a slightly distorted square planar
geometry with trans phosphorus atoms. This trans-chelating mode of NiXantphos is similar to that of
Xantphos: Xantphos is trans-chelating in all reported
solid-state structures of (Xantphos)Pd(Ar)(halide) complexes to date.[30] A larger dihedral angle between the two benzo
groups of the phenoxazine ring system was observed in (NiXantphos)Pd(Ph)(Cl):
27.8° vs 1.9° in Figure 1a and 16.4°
in Figure 1b.
ORTEP diagram of (NiXantphos)Pd(Ph)(Cl)
with 50% probability thermal ellipsoids displayed. Hydrogen atoms
omitted for clarity. Pd1–P1 = 2.3168(9) Å, Pd1–P2
= 2.3083(8) Å, Pd1–C37 = 2.048(2) Å, Pd1–Cl1
= 2.4348(8) Å, P1···P2 distance =4.454 Å,
Pd1···O1 distance = 2.686 Å, C37–Pd1–Cl1
angle = 178.70°, P1–Pd1–P2 angle = 148.76°.The same reactivity was also observed
when KN(SiMe3)2 was used in place of LiN(SiMe3)2 in the oxidative addition of chlorobenzene:
the reaction neared completion after 24 h, as judged by a singlet
at 2.8 ppm in 31P{1H} NMR spectrum. The results
of these experiments are counterintuitive given that oxidative addition
of aryl chlorides has been shown to proceed via a PdL1 pathway.
Bidentate ligands typically require significantly higher temperatures
because they react via the less favorable PdL2 pathway.
Thus, the observation that a bidentate triarylphosphine derivative can activate aryl chlorides at room temperature is unexpected
and highlights the novel characteristics of this heterobimetalliccatalyst system under the basicDCCPconditions. The oxidative addition
studies lay the foundation for aryl chlorides to undergo room temperature
cross-coupling reactions catalyzed by Pd–NiXantphos.By directly employing K–NiXantphos as a ligand, attempts to
synthesize the corresponding palladiumcompounds (K–NiXantphos)Pd(dba),
(K–NiXantphos)PdCl2 and (K–NiXantphos)Pd(OAc)2 were unsuccessful. Upon mixing 1 equiv of K–NiXantphos
with the corresponding palladium sources [0.5 equiv of Pd2dba3, 1 equiv of (norbornadiene)PdCl2, or 1
equiv of Pd(OAc)2] we observed multiple products as judged
by 31P{1H} NMR spectroscopy. It is possible
that K–NiXantphoscould undergo rapid transmetalation with
Pd(II) or react with dba. Furthermore, combination of 0.5 equiv of
Pd2dba3 with 2 equiv of neutral NiXantphos in
THF (or toluene) resulted in precipitation of a greenish yellow solid.
The identity of the precipitate was confirmed as Pd(NiXantphos)2 by HRMS analysis. Unfortunately, Pd(NiXantphos)2 was insoluble in common organic solvents. A similar synthetic route
was reported for Pd(Xantphos)2 by the Buchwald group, and
its poor solubility was also noted.[26]
Development of DCCP with Aryl Chlorides
On the basis of the preliminary studies in section 2.3, we carried out a ligand comparison experiment employing
1-tert-butyl-4-chlorobenzene (2a) as
the cross-coupling partner under reaction conditions related to our
previous DCCP of aryl bromides (Scheme 3).
The comparison was performed on a 10 μmol scale. To probe our
hypothesis that the deprotonation of NiXantphos is responsible for
the exceptional reactivity in the oxidative addition of aryl chlorides,
we synthesized and tested N-benzyl-NiXantphos, which
cannot undergo deprotonation.[8]
Scheme 3
Selected Results
of the Cross-Coupling of 1a with 2a
Conducted on a 10 μmol scale
at 0.1 M.
In
agreement with our hypothesis, excellent HPLC assay yield (AY) of
the product 3aa was observed using 10 mol % Pd–NiXantphos.
In contrast, catalysts generated from N-Bn-NiXantphos
showed <2% conversion and Xantphos did not generate detectable
amounts of products (Scheme 3). Other ligands
known to participate in coupling reactions with aryl chlorides showed
little or no reactivity in this cross-coupling.
Selected Results
of the Cross-Coupling of 1a with 2a
Conducted on a 10 μmol scale
at 0.1 M.Considering the structural similarity
of NiXantphos, N-Bn-NiXantphos, and Xantphos, as
well as the fact that NiXantphos was deprotonated by KN(SiMe3)2 under the DCCP reaction conditions, the data in Scheme 3 support the hypothesis that K–NiXantphos
forms the active palladiumcatalyst to “turn on” the
cross-couplings with aryl chloride 2a at room temperature,
while the neutral N-Bn-NiXantphos and Xantphos do
not (Figure 3).
Figure 3
Proposed “turn
on” form of palladium(0) bearing a deprotonated NiXantphos
and the “turn off” form of palladium(0) bearing a neutral N-Bn-NiXantphos or Xantphos for the DCCP with aryl chlorides.
Proposed “turn
on” form of palladium(0) bearing a deprotonated NiXantphos
and the “turn off” form of palladium(0) bearing a neutral N-Bn-NiXantphos or Xantphos for the DCCP with aryl chlorides.
Optimization
of DCCP with Diphenylmethane and Aryl Chloride 2a
The results
in Scheme 3 provided an excellent starting
point for the C–C bond formation from diphenylmethane and aryl
chloride 2a at room temperature. A 91% assay yield (HPLC)
was obtained at 10 mol % catalyst loading on microscale. This microscale
reaction was successfully translated to laboratory scale (0.1 mmol)
under the same conditions (Table 3, entry 1,
87% assay yield). In further agreement with the data in Scheme 3, Pd–Xantphoscatalyst system did not render
any product 3aa under the same conditions either at 24
or 80 °C. Considering 10 mol % catalyst loading was relatively
high, further optimization on laboratory scale was desired for the
room temperature DCCP.
Table 3
Optimization of Pd–NiXantphos
Catalyzed DCCP of 1a with 2aa
entry
1a:2a
Pd (mol %)
solvent
concentration (M)
yield (%)b
1
1.2:1.0
10
CPME
0.1
87
2
1.2:1.0
10
DME
0.1
61
3
1.2:1.0
10
2-MeTHF
0.1
78
4
1.2:1.0
10
THF
0.1
>95
S
1.2:1.0
10
dioxane
0.1
25
6
1.2:1.0
10
MTBE
0.1
10
7
1.2:1.0
5
THF
0.1
79
8
1.2:1.0
5
THF
0.2
58
9c
1.2:1.0
5
THF
0.2
76
10
1.0:2.0
5
THF
0.2
>95 (99)d
11
1.0:2.0
2.5
THF
0.2
(81)d
Reactions
conducted on a 0.1 mmol scale using 1a, 2a, and 3 equiv of KN(SiMe3)2 at 24 °C.
Yield determined by 1H NMR spectroscopy of the crude reaction mixture.
5 mol % the methanesulfonate precatalyst 4 was used in place of Pd(OAc)2/NiXantphos.
Isolated yield after chromatographic
purification.
Reactions
conducted on a 0.1 mmol scale using 1a, 2a, and 3 equiv of KN(SiMe3)2 at 24 °C.Yield determined by 1H NMR spectroscopy of the crude reaction mixture.5 mol % the methanesulfonate precatalyst 4 was used in place of Pd(OAc)2/NiXantphos.Isolated yield after chromatographic
purification.We next examined
five additional ethereal solvents [DME, 2-MeTHF, THF, dioxane, and
MTBE (methyl tert-butyl ether)] in the presence of
1.2 equiv of diphenylmethane (1a), 1 equiv of 1-tert-butyl-4-chlorobenzene (2a), and 3 equiv
of KN(SiMe3)2 at 0.1 M and 24 °C (entries
2–6). Dioxane and MTBE (entries 5 and 6) afforded <25% yield
of product 3aa due to solubility issues of the reactants
at 24 °C. The lead result was obtained when THF was used as solvent,
where the triarylmethane 3aa was generated in >95%
yield (entry 4). Reduction of the catalyst loading from 10 to 5 mol
% while increasing the reaction concentration from 0.1 to 0.2 M in
THF resulted in only a minor loss in yield (entries 7 and 8 vs 4).
Under otherwise identical conditions, a similar yield (76%, entry
9) was obtained using 5 mol % of the methanesulfonate precatalyst 4 in place of Pd(OAc)2/NiXantphos (entry 9 vs 8).
Considering the commercial availability of both Pd(OAc)2 and NiXantphos, we continued with the Pd(OAc)2/NiXantphoscatalyst system for further optimization. Switching the limiting reagent
from aryl chloride 2a to diphenylmethane 1a resulted in >95% yield of the triarylmethane product 3aa with 5 mol % catalyst loading in THF at 0.2 M at 24 °C (entry
10). Compound 3aa was ultimately isolated in 99% yield
after flash chromatography. Further reducing the catalyst loading
to 2.5 mol % rendered 3aa in 81% isolated yield (entry
11). These optimized conditions were carried forward in the next phase,
which focused on the determination of the scope of aryl chlorides
in Pd–NiXantphos-catalyzed DCCP.
Scope
of Aryl Chlorides in DCCP with Diphenylmethane
In previous
reports, we demonstrated that a large range of sterically and electronically
diverse hetero- and nonheteroaryl-containing diarylmethane derivatives
readily undergo DCCP with aryl bromides to afford
an array of triarylmethane products.[11] In
the current study, the scope of Pd–NiXantphoscatalyzed DCCP
using a variety of aryl chlorides with a model diarylmethane substrate
(1a) is presented in Table 4.
Table 4
Scope of Aryl Chlorides in Pd–NiXantphos-Catalyzed
DCCP with 1aa
Reactions conducted on a 0.1 mmol scale using 1.2
equiv of 1a, 3 equiv of KN(SiMe3)2, and 1 equiv of 2 (conditions A) or 1 equiv of 1a, 3 equiv of KN(SiMe3)2, and 2 equiv
of 2 (conditions B) using 2.5–10 mol % Pd(OAc)2 and NiXantphos (Pd:L = 1:2) in THF at 0.2 M at 24 °C.
Isolated yield after chromatographic purification.
1a:KN(SiMe3)2:2 = 4:2:1.
CPME was used as solvent.
80 °C.
1a:KN(SiMe3)2:2 = 1:3:3.
2-MeTHF was used as solvent.
1a:KN(SiMe3)2:2 = 1.2:4:1.
1a:KN(SiMe3)2:2 = 3:4:1.
1a:KN(SiMe3)2:2 = 1:5:2.
Reactions conducted on a 0.1 mmol scale using 1.2
equiv of 1a, 3 equiv of KN(SiMe3)2, and 1 equiv of 2 (conditions A) or 1 equiv of 1a, 3 equiv of KN(SiMe3)2, and 2 equiv
of 2 (conditions B) using 2.5–10 mol % Pd(OAc)2 and NiXantphos (Pd:L = 1:2) in THF at 0.2 M at 24 °C.
Isolated yield after chromatographic purification.1a:KN(SiMe3)2:2 = 4:2:1.CPME was used as solvent.80 °C.1a:KN(SiMe3)2:2 = 1:3:3.2-MeTHF was used as solvent.1a:KN(SiMe3)2:2 = 1.2:4:1.1a:KN(SiMe3)2:2 = 3:4:1.1a:KN(SiMe3)2:2 = 1:5:2.In general, fair to excellent reactivity
was exhibited by aryl chlorides bearing various substituents (2a–2k). At least one combination from
(1) the two ratios of reagents [diphenylmethane (1a):KN(SiMe3)2:aryl chloride (2) = 1.2:3:1 (conditions
A) and 1:3:2 (conditions B)] and (2) the three ethereal solvents (THF,
CPME, and 2-MeTHF) at 2.5–10 mol % catalyst loading successfully
delivered the desired DCCP products in 56–99% yields (average
yield: 86% for 11 aryl chlorides, 2a–2k). Both 4-tert-butylphenyl and phenyl chloride furnished 3aa and 3ab in 81% and 96% yield, respectively,
at 2.5 mol % palladium loading. Methyl (2c), N,N-dimethylamino (2d), and
trifluoromethyl (2e) groups at the meta position were all well-tolerated (3ac–3ae in 82–94% yields). Excellent yields were obtained
using aryl chlorides bearing both electron-withdrawing CF3 and 4-F groups (2e, 2f, 2g) and electron-donating 4-OMe and 4-(N-pyrrolyl)
groups (2h, 2i). The sterically more hindered
1-chloronaphthalene and 2-chloroanisole (2j and 2k) also participated in DCCP to produce the desired products.
These substrates, however, required higher temperature (80 °C)
to give 66% (3aj) and 56% (3ak) yield, respectively.We next tested aryl chloride substrates bearing sensitive functional
groups and heteroaryl groups (2l–2t). As shown in Table 4, remarkable chemoselectivity
was demonstrated with aryl chloridescontaining cyano, keto,acetyl,
phenol, phenothiazine, acetamide, and 1H-indole moieties,
all of which underwent DCCP delivering the corresponding functionalized
triarylmethane products without observation of byproducts (3al–3at). Nitriles and ketones are well-known to
undergo 1,2-addition reactions with reactive organometallics, while
4′-chloroacetophenonecan participate in competitive aldol[31] and α-arylation[32] reactions under the basic reaction conditions (pKa of acetophenone: 24.713). Yet the triarylmethane
products (3al, 3am, 3an) were
produced in 59–94% yields. Challenging classes of substrates
bearing acidic O–H and N–H bonds (2o–2t) were next examined. Phenols are known to undergo O– and C(sp2)–H arylation,[33] while 1H-indoles (and anilines)
have been reported to react via N-arylation (Buchwald–Hartwig
coupling)[22,34] and C-2- and C-3-arylation[35] in the presence of palladiumcatalysts and bases. Our method
exhibits orthogonal chemoselectivity with DCCP taking place exclusively
at the benzylicC(sp3)–H of diphenylmethane (1a) and the C(sp2)–Cl of aryl chlorides 2o–2t. These functional groups and heteroaryl
groups present opportunities to further functionalize the triarylmethane
products. Note that for each equivalent of aryl chloride bearing acidic
protons (2n–2t), an extra equivalent
of KN(SiMe3)2 was employed. For substrates giving
less than 80% yield (2n, 2p, 2r–2t), 1H NMR of the reaction mixture
after workup showed only remaining starting materials and product.
No byproduct formation was observed. Attempts to push these reactions
to completion, however, were unsuccessful. Unfortunately, 3-chloropyridine
and 2- and 3-chlorothiophene failed to give the DCCP products in reasonable
yield (<10%).After demonstrating that aryl chloride substrates
bearing sensitive functional groups and heteroaryl groups (2l–2t) were viable cross-coupling partners in Pd–NiXantphos-catalyzed
DCCP with diphenylmethane (1a), an unactivated alkenyl
chloride 2u was tested (eq 3).
Vinyl chloride 2u participated in DCCP to afford 3au in 99% yield at 2.5 mol % catalyst loading at 80 °C.
Even at 1.25 mol % catalyst loading under identical conditions, 3au was produced in 80% yield. These results indicate the
Pd–NiXantphoscatalyst can oxidatively add unactivated alkenyl
chlorides. It is also interesting that the product did not isomerize,
suggesting that deprotonation of the product did not occur.As shown in Table 4, both the synthetic
utility and the remarkable chemoselectivity of the Pd–NiXantphos-catalyzed
C–Ccross-coupling method with a large variety of aryl chlorides
have been demonstrated. Several aspects are noteworthy: (1) 3- and
4-chlorophenols (2o, 2p) reacted with 1a to give the DCCP products in 84% and 40% yield, respectively.
Given that these phenols are deprotonated by KN(SiMe3)2 to give phenoxides under the reaction conditions, these results
suggest that the Pd–NiXantphoscatalyst system is able to undergo
oxidative addition with very electron-rich C(sp2)–Cl
bonds (such as those in phenoxides). (2) 2-Chlorophenothiazine (2q) produced the DCCP product in 86% yield without observation
of N-arylation byproduct. Since 2q has
a phenothiazinecore, which is structurally similar to the phenoxazinecore in NiXantphos, this result supports our earlier conclusion based
on the ligand exchange/recovery experiments that NiXantphos was not N-arylated during the reaction.
Scope
of Diarylmethanes in DCCP
The scope of the DCCP with respect
to diarylmethanes was next explored with aryl chlorides (2a, 2b) (Table 5).
Table 5
Scope of Diarylmethanes in Pd–NiXantphos-Catalyzed DCCPa
Reactions
conducted on a 0.1 mmol scale using 1 equiv of 1, 3 equiv
of KN(SiMe3)2, and 2 equiv of 2 with 2.5–5 mol % Pd(OAc)2 and NiXantphos (Pd:L
= 1:2) in THF at 0.2 M at 24 °C. Isolated yield after chromatographic
purification.
LiN(SiMe3)2 was used as base instead of KN(SiMe3)2.
Reactions
conducted on a 0.1 mmol scale using 1 equiv of 1, 3 equiv
of KN(SiMe3)2, and 2 equiv of 2 with 2.5–5 mol % Pd(OAc)2 and NiXantphos (Pd:L
= 1:2) in THF at 0.2 M at 24 °C. Isolated yield after chromatographic
purification.LiN(SiMe3)2 was used as base instead of KN(SiMe3)2.Substrates
bearing various substituents on the diarylmethane exhibited excellent
reactivity at 2.5–5 mol % catalyst loading at room temperature.
Alkyl (3bb), electron-donating (3cb), and
electron-withdrawing groups (3db) were all well-tolerated.
Heteroaryl-containing diarylmethane analogues proved to be good substrates,
with corresponding products isolated in 76–99% isolated yields
(3eb, 3fb, 3ga, 3ha). Note that, although 3-benzylpyridine required KN(SiMe3)2 as base to promote DCCP (3fb), a weaker
base, LiN(SiMe3)2, successfully promoted DCCP
with the more acidic2- and 4-benzylpyridines (pKa = 28.2 and 26.7, respectively)[13] to deliver 3ga and 3ha in good yields.
Identification of the Catalyst Resting State and
Countercation Effects
To determine the resting state of the
palladiumcatalyst in our DCCP reactions, we conducted the catalytic
reaction with diphenylmethane (1a), chlorobenzene (2b), and KN(SiMe3)2 as base in the presence
of 10 mol % of the methanesulfonate precatalyst 4 in
THF in a sealed J. Young NMR tube at room temperature. The only species
observed by 31P{1H} NMR spectroscopy over the
course of the DCCP (12 h) was Pd(K–NiXantphos)2,
as judged by a singlet at −1.3 ppm in 31P{1H} NMR spectrum. Using 10 mol % Pd(OAc)2 and 20 mol %
NiXantphos gave the same dominant catalyst resting state 10 min after
addition of 1a, 2b, and KN(SiMe3)2 at room temperature (see SI). The catalyst resting state suggests that ligand dissociation and/or
oxidative addition is turnover limiting. The Hartwig group has reported
the identification of Pd(P̂P)2 complexes (P̂P
= a chelating diphosphine ligand such as BINAP and DPPF) as the dominant
resting state in the Pd–P̂P catalyzed amination of aryl
bromides.[7b] The turnover-limiting step
was dissociation of BINAP from Pd(BINAP)2 when BINAP was
used as the ligand, while the combination of ligand dissociation and irreversible
oxidative addition were the turnover-limiting steps in the catalytic
process when DPPF was used as ligand.Pd(K–NiXantphos)2 was independently prepared from combination of 1 equiv of
the methanesulfonate precatalyst 4 with 4.5 equiv of
KN(SiMe3)2 and 1 equiv of NiXantphos ligand
in THF at 24 °C under a nitrogen atmosphere (eq 4). We propose that the in situ-generated coordinatively unsaturated
(K–NiXantphos)Pd(0) reacts rapidly with 1 equiv of K–NiXantphos.
The formation of Pd(K–NiXantphos)2 was complete
in 10 min as judged by the disappearance of 4 and appearance
of a new singlet at −1.3 ppm in the 31P{1H} NMR spectrum. Single-crystals of Pd(K–NiXantphos)2 were obtained by crystallization from THF at 24 °C and found
to be extremely sensitive, and sample decomposition during mounting
could not be avoided (see SI). Although
the quality of the structure precludes detailed discussion of the
metrics, it does serve to establish the connectivity {see Figure 4 for a drawing of the structure and Figure 5 for the structure of [PdK2(THF)4(NiXantphos)2]∞}. In the solid
state Pd(K–NiXantphos)2 exhibits a polymeric structure
in which the Pd(0)center adopts a slightly distorted tetrahedral
geometry. The PdL2 units are linked together by bridging
potassium–nitrogen interactions, similar to those observed
in the structure of K–NiXantphos (Figure 1a). The P–Pd–P angle containing two phosphorus atoms
of the same K–NiXantphos ligand is 113.22(7)°. The other
P–Pd–P angles are 102.91(12)°, 106.78(7)°,
and 113.54(12)°. The deprotonated phenoxazine ring exhibits a
dihedral angle of 23.1° between the two benzo groups of the heterocyclic
framework. In contrast to the solid-state polymeric structure, the
hydrodynamic radius (rH) of Pd(K–NiXantphos)2, as measured by diffusion-ordered 1H NMR spectroscopy
(DOSY) in THF-d8, was consistent with
a monomer (see SI).
Figure 4
Drawing
of the solid-state structure of polymeric Pd(K–NiXantphos)2 illustrating the connectivity.
Figure 5
Structure of polymeric [PdK2(THF)4(NiXantphos)2]∞. Coordinated THF molecules and phenyl
groups from NiXanphos are shown in wireframe, and hydrogen atoms are
omitted for clarity.
Drawing
of the solid-state structure of polymericPd(K–NiXantphos)2 illustrating the connectivity.Structure of polymeric [PdK2(THF)4(NiXantphos)2]∞. Coordinated THF molecules and phenyl
groups from NiXanphos are shown in wireframe, and hydrogen atoms are
omitted for clarity.To compare the catalytic reactivity using different countercations
(Li, Na vs K), we carried out our DCCP reactions under standard conditions
with 2-benzylpyridine (1g) and 1-tert-butyl-4-chlorobenzene (2a) using the following 3 bases:
LiN(SiMe3)2, NaN(SiMe3)2, and KN(SiMe3)2. We have previously demonstrated
that DCCP of diphenylmethane (1a) with aryl bromides
is readily promoted by KN(SiMe3)2, but the reaction
fails when NaN(SiMe3)2 or LiN(SiMe3)2 is used in the absence of additives. In contrast, DCCP
of the more acidic substrate 2-benzylpyridine (1g) can
be promoted by MN(SiMe3)2 (M = Li, Na, K).[11b] Assay yields of the product 3ga at 2 h from the DCCP reactions employing 3 bases
MN(SiMe3)2 (M = Li, Na, K) are illustrated in
eq 5 (average of two runs). The impact of the
countercation on the catalytic reaction follows the trend: K ≈
Na > Li. At this point, it is difficult to draw conclusions from
these data because the main group metal is involved in the deprotonation
of the substrate and catalyst and in each step of the catalyticcycle.Finally, we wanted to determine if the oxidative addition
product was a competent intermediate in the catalytic reaction. As
mentioned in eq 2, isolation of (Li–NiXantphos)Pd(Ph)(Cl)
from the byproducts of its synthesis was challenging. Instead, we
synthesized a neutral oxidative addition species, (NiXantphos)Pd(4-C6H4CN)(Br) (5) in 88% yield, following
the procedure for the preparation of (Xantphos)Pd(4-C6H4CN)(Br).[25a] Subjecting 5 mol % 5 to the catalytic reaction resulted in 86% isolated yield
of the DCCP product 3aa (eq 6),
suggesting that the oxidative addition species is a competent intermediate.
Summary and Outlook
On the basis of
a large number of studies, it was widely accepted that palladiumcomplexes
based on bidentate triarylphosphines would not oxidatively
add unactivated aryl chlorides at room temperature and could not,
therefore, catalyze coupling processes with aryl chloride substrates.
In this report we have disclosed an exception to this paradigm by
demonstrating that under basic reaction conditions the heterobimetallicPd(M-NiXantphos)-based catalyst system readily activates aryl chlorides
at room temperature and successfully promotes the arylation of diphenylmethane
derivatives.The advantages of the Pd–NiXantphoscatalyst
system are (1) mild conditions (room temperature) for cross-coupling
reactions with unactivated aryl chlorides, (2) greater air- and oxidative-stability
of NiXantphos relative to alkylphosphines (many of which are of high
sensitivity and/or pyrophoric), (3) superior catalytic performance
to all the other mono- and bidentate ligands examined in this report,
and (4) commercial availability of palladium source and ligand.A dramatic difference in the catalytic performance was observed between
NiXantphos (91% AY) and its structurally similar analogues N-Bn-NiXantphos (1% AY) and Xantphos (0% AY), supporting
our hypothesis that the oxidative addition is facilitated with NiXantphos
because the heterobimetallicPd–ligand catalyst system exhibits
greatly enhanced reactivity due to the presence of the main group
metal. The DCCP with aryl chlorides affords a variety of triarylmethane
products, a class of compounds with applications and biological activity.
Additionally, the DCCP exhibits remarkable chemoselectivity in the
presence of aryl chloride substrates bearing heteroaryl groups and
sensitive functional groups that are known to undergo 1,2-addition,
aldol reaction, O–, N–,
enolate-α–, and C(sp2)–H arylation
reactions.The advantages and importance of the Pd–NiXantphoscatalyst system outlined herein make it a valuable contribution to
applications in Pd-catalyzed arylation reactions with aryl chlorides
under mild conditions. Future work will focus on structural modification
of NiXantphos to increase its reactivity and efficiency in catalytic
processes.
Experimental Section
Representative procedures are described herein. Full experimental
details and characterization of all compounds are provided in the SI.
General Methods
All reactions were performed under nitrogen using oven-dried glassware
and standard Schlenk or vacuum line techniques. Air- and moisture-sensitive
solutions were handled under nitrogen and transferred via syringe.
THF was freshly distilled from Na/benzophenone ketyl under nitrogen.
Anhydrous CPME, 2-MeTHF, dioxane, and MTBE were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich
and used as solvent without further purification. Unless otherwise
stated, reagents were commercially available and used as purchased
without further purification. Chemicals were obtained from Sigma-Aldrich,
Acros, TCI America or Alfa Aesar, and solvents were purchased from
Fisher Scientific. The progress of the reactions was monitored by
thin-layer chromatography using Whatman Partisil K6F 250 μm
precoated 60 Å silica gel plates and visualized by short-wavelength
ultraviolet light as well as by treatment with ceric ammonium molybdate
(CAM) stain or iodine. Silica gel (230–400 mesh, Silicycle)
was used for flash chromatography. The 1H NMR and 13C{1H} NMR spectra were obtained using a Brüker
AM-500 Fourier-transform NMR spectrometer at 500 and 125 MHz, respectively.
Chemical shifts are reported in units of parts per million (ppm) downfield
from tetramethylsilane (TMS), and all coupling constants are reported
in hertz. The 31P{1H} NMR spectra were obtained
using a Brüker DMX-360 NMR spectrometer at 145.8 MHz, with
chemical shifts reported with respect to calibration with an external
standard of phosphoric acid (0 ppm). The infrared spectra were obtained
with KBr plates using a PerkinElmer Spectrum 100 series FTIR spectrometer.
High-resolution mass spectrometry (HRMS) data were obtained on a Waters
LC-TOF mass spectrometer (model LCT-XE Premier) using chemical ionization
(CI) or electrospray ionization (ESI) in positive or negative mode,
depending on the analyte. Melting points were determined on a Unimelt
Thomas-Hoover melting point apparatus and are uncorrected.
General Procedure A. Pd-Catalyzed DCCP of Diarylmethanes with
Aryl Chlorides
An oven-dried 10 mL reaction vial equipped
with a stir bar was charged with KN(SiMe3)2 (59.8
mg, 0.30 mmol, 3 equiv) under a nitrogen atmosphere. A solution (from
a stock solution) of Pd(OAc)2 (0.56 mg, 0.0025 mmol, 2.5
mol %) and NiXantphos (2.76 mg, 0.0050 mmol, 5 mol %) in 0.5 mL of
dry THF was taken up by syringe and added to the reaction vial. After
stirring for 5 min at 24 °C, diphenylmethane (16.7 μL,
0.1 mmol, 1 equiv) was added to the reaction mixture followed by 1-tert-butyl-4-chlorobenzene (33.4 μL, 0.2 mmol, 2 equiv).
Note that the aryl chloride in a solid form was added to the reaction
vial prior to KN(SiMe3)2. The reaction mixture
was stirred for 12 h at 24 °C, quenched with three drops of H2O, diluted with 3 mL of ethyl acetate, and filtered over a
pad of MgSO4 and silica. The pad was rinsed with additional
ethyl acetate, and the solution was concentrated in vacuo. The crude
material was loaded onto a silica gelcolumn and purified by flash
chromatography.
General Procedure B. Pd-Catalyzed
DCCP Followed by Ligand Exchange and Recovery of NiXantphos
The experiments were set up inside a glovebox under a nitrogen atmosphere.
An 8 mL reaction vial equipped with a stir bar was charged with KN(SiMe3)2 (329 mg, 1.65 mmol, 3 equiv). A solution of
Pd(OAc)2 (6.2 mg, 0.028 mmol, 5 mol %) and NiXantphos (30.0
mg, 0.054 mmol, 10 mol %) in 6 mL of dry CPME was taken up by syringe
and added to the reaction vial. After stirring for 5 min at 24 °C,
diphenylmethane (110 μL, 0.66 mmol, 1.2 equiv) was added to
the reaction mixture followed by 1-bromo-4-tert-butylbenzene
(95 μL, 0.55 mmol, 1 equiv). The reaction mixture was stirred
for 12 h at 24 °C, before 1,2-bis(diethylphosphino)ethane (depe,
103 μL, 0.44 mmol, depe:NiXantphos = 8:1) was added into the
reaction mixture. The reaction mixture was stirred for another 40
min at 24 °C. The reaction was quenched with H2O,
diluted with ethyl acetate, and filtered over a pad of silica. The
pad was rinsed with additional ethyl acetate, and the solution was
concentrated in vacuo. The crude material was loaded onto a silica
gel column and purified by flash chromatography to afford the triarylmethane
product 3aa (91% yield) and NiXantphos (80% recovery).
General Procedure C. HTE for Pd-Catalyzed DCCP of
Diphenylmethane with 1-tert-Butyl-4-chlorobenzene
Experiments were set up inside a glovebox under a nitrogen atmosphere.
A 96-well aluminum block containing 1 mL glass vials was predosed
with Pd(OAc)2 (1 μmol) and Ligand (Ligand was used
in a 4:1 ratio relative to Pd for monodentate ligands and 2:1 ratio
for bidentate ligands) in THF. The solvent was evacuated to dryness
using a Genevac vacuum centrifuge, and KN(SiMe3)2 (30 μmol) in THF was added to the ligand/catalyst mixture.
The solvent was removed on the Genevac, and a parylene stir bar was
then added to each reaction vial. 1-tert-Butyl-4-chlorobenzene
(10 μmol/reaction), diphenylmethane (12 μmol/reaction)
and biphenyl (1 μmol/reaction) (used as an internal standard
to measure HPLC yields) were then dosed together into each reaction
vial as a solution in CPME (100 μL, 0.1 M). The 96-well plate
was then sealed and stirred for 18 h at 24 °C. Upon opening the
plate to air, 500 μL of acetonitrile was pipetted into each
vial. The plate was then covered again and the vials stirred for 20
min to extract the product and to ensure good homogenization. Into
a separate 96-well LC block was added 700 μL of acetonitrile,
followed by 40 μL of the diluted reaction mixtures. The LC block
was then sealed with a silicon-rubber storage mat, and mounted on
an HPLC instrument for analysis.
General
Procedure D. Synthesis of K–NiXantphos
Experiments
were set up inside a glovebox under a nitrogen atmosphere. To a 20
mL vial containing NiXantphos (110 mg, 0.2 mmol, 1 equiv) dissolved
in 10 mL of Et2O was slowly added a solution of KN(SiMe3)2 (40 mg, 0.2 mmol, 1 equiv) in 2 mL of Et2O, resulting in rapid precipitation of a yellow solid. After
stirring for 2 h, the slurry was filtered through a fritted filter,
and the solid was washed with 3 × 5 mL Et2O. Drying
the solid under reduced pressure yielded a yellow powder. X-ray diffraction-quality
single crystals were obtained by layering a concentrated THF solution
of K–NiXantphos with hexanes at −21 °C. X-ray diffraction-quality
single crystals of the reddish-orange crown ether adduct, K(THF)(18-crown-6)–NiXantphos,
were obtained by vapor diffusion of pentane into a concentrated THF
solution of K–NiXantphos and 18-crown-6 (1:1) at −21
°C.
General Procedure E. Oxidative Addition of
Chlorobenzene to (M–NiXantphos)Pd(0)
Experiments were set up inside a glovebox under a nitrogen atmosphere.
Precatalyst 4 (9.2 mg, 0.01 mmol, 1 equiv) was added
to a J. Young NMR tube followed by chlorobenzene (5.1 μL, 0.05
mmol, 5 equiv). LiN(SiMe3)2 (5.9 mg, 0.035 mmol,
3.5 equiv) was weighed in a vial, dissolved in THF (500 μL),
and transferred to the NMR tube. The solution became reddish-orange
immediately. The progress of the reaction was monitored by 31P{1H} NMR spectroscopy. X-ray diffraction-quality single
crystals of the protonated (NiXantphos)Pd(Ph)(Cl) were obtained by
vapor diffusion of pentane into a concentrated THF solution of the
reaction mixture at −21 °C.
General
Procedure F. Synthesis of Pd(K–NiXantphos)2
Experiments were set up inside a glovebox under a nitrogen atmosphere.
NiXantphos (5.5 mg, 0.01 mmol, 1 equiv) and precatalyst 4 (9.2 mg, 0.01 mmol, 1 equiv) were added to a J. Young NMR tube.
KN(SiMe3)2 (9.0 mg, 0.045 mmol, 4.5 equiv) was
weighed in a vial, dissolved in THF (500 μL), and transferred
to the NMR tube. The solution became reddish-orange immediately. The
progress of the reaction was monitored by 31P{1H} NMR spectroscopy. The formation of Pd(K–NiXantphos)2 was complete in 10 min, as judged by disappearance of 4 and appearance of a new singlet at −1.3 ppm in 31P{1H} NMR spectrum. The reaction mixture was set
undisturbed for 12 h. X-ray diffraction-quality single crystals of
Pd[K(THF)2(NiXantphos)]2 were obtained under
these conditions. The crystalline product was then filtered and washed
with 3 × 10 mL Et2O. Drying under reduced pressure
yielded the product as a yellow crystalline solid. The product is
highly sensitive to trace oxygen.
Authors: Joseph R Martinelli; Donald A Watson; Dominique M M Freckmann; Timothy E Barder; Stephen L Buchwald Journal: J Org Chem Date: 2008-08-23 Impact factor: 4.354