Literature DB >> 24743849

Baseline factors predictive of patient satisfaction with sacral neuromodulation for idiopathic fecal incontinence.

Jakob Duelund-Jakobsen1, Bart van Wunnik, Steen Buntzen, Lilli Lundby, Søren Laurberg, Cor Baeten.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Sacral neuromodulation (SNM) is an established treatment for fecal incontinence (FI). A recent study from our group found that the relationship between patient satisfaction and clinical outcome is complex and does not match the traditional used success criteria. Therefore, the ability to predict patient satisfaction must be given priority. The aim of the present study is to identify baseline factors predictive of patient satisfaction, with SNM, for idiopathic FI.
METHODS: We analyzed data from patients treated with SNM for idiopathic FI in Aarhus, Denmark, and Maastricht, The Netherlands. A questionnaire considering self-reported satisfaction was mailed to these patients and compared to baseline characteristics. Logistic regression was used to determine the predictive value of baseline demographic and diagnostic variables.
RESULTS: In total, 131 patients were included in the analysis. Patient satisfaction with the current treatment result was reported in 75 patients. Fifty-six patients were dissatisfied with SNM treatment, after median 46 months (range 11-122) with permanent implantation. Pudendal nerve terminal motor latency (PNTML) was the solely identified predictor for long-term patient satisfaction. A subgroup univariate-logistic regression analysis showed that PNTML ≤ 2.3 ms at the side of lead implantation was a statistically significant predictor for patient satisfaction (odds ratio (OR) 2.3, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.01-5.24, p = 0.048).
CONCLUSION: Baseline PNTML measurement may be predictive of long-term satisfaction with SNM therapy for idiopathic FI. Further studies are needed to confirm this result.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24743849     DOI: 10.1007/s00384-014-1870-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis        ISSN: 0179-1958            Impact factor:   2.571


  35 in total

1.  Fecal Incontinence Quality of Life Scale: quality of life instrument for patients with fecal incontinence.

Authors:  T H Rockwood; J M Church; J W Fleshman; R L Kane; C Mavrantonis; A G Thorson; S D Wexner; D Bliss; A C Lowry
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 4.585

2.  Sacral nerve stimulation for treatment of fecal incontinence: a novel approach for intractable fecal incontinence.

Authors:  E Ganio; A R Luc; G Clerico; M Trompetto
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 4.585

3.  Prospective comparison of faecal incontinence grading systems.

Authors:  C J Vaizey; E Carapeti; J A Cahill; M A Kamm
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 23.059

4.  Test-retest repeatability of anorectal physiology tests in healthy volunteers.

Authors:  A M Ryhammer; S Laurberg; A P Hermann
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 4.585

Review 5.  Electrical stimulation in the clinical management of the neurogenic bladder.

Authors:  E A Tanagho; R A Schmidt
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1988-12       Impact factor: 7.450

6.  Electrical stimulation of sacral spinal nerves for treatment of faecal incontinence.

Authors:  K E Matzel; U Stadelmaier; M Hohenfellner; F P Gall
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1995-10-28       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 7.  Anorectal manometry: the state of the art.

Authors:  P D Meunier; D Gallavardin
Journal:  Dig Dis       Date:  1993 Jul-Oct       Impact factor: 2.404

8.  Fecal incontinence: does age matter? Characteristics of older vs. younger women presenting for treatment of fecal incontinence.

Authors:  Jennifer Y Wang; Taryn R Patterson; Stacey L Hart; Madhulika G Varma
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2008-01-23       Impact factor: 4.585

9.  Sacral nerve stimulation for fecal incontinence: external anal sphincter defect vs. intact anal sphincter.

Authors:  Miranda K Y Chan; Joe J Tjandra
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2008-05-17       Impact factor: 4.585

10.  Sacral neuromodulation in patients with faecal incontinence: results of the first 100 permanent implantations.

Authors:  J Melenhorst; S M Koch; O Uludag; W G van Gemert; C G Baeten
Journal:  Colorectal Dis       Date:  2007-05-17       Impact factor: 3.788

View more
  2 in total

1.  Adverse events of sacral neuromodulation for fecal incontinence reported to the federal drug administration.

Authors:  Klaus Bielefeldt
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2016-05-06

Review 2.  Management of patients with faecal incontinence.

Authors:  Jakob Duelund-Jakobsen; Jonas Worsoe; Lilli Lundby; Peter Christensen; Klaus Krogh
Journal:  Therap Adv Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 4.409

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.