Kimon Bekelis1, Symeon Missios2, Todd A Mackenzie3,4,5. 1. Section of Neurosurgery, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH. 2. Department of Neurosurgery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH. 3. Department of Medicine, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH. 4. Department of Community and Family Medicine, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH. 5. The Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice, Lebanon, NH.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the association of helicopter transport with survival of patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI), in comparison with ground emergency medical services (EMS). BACKGROUND: Helicopter utilization and its effect on the outcomes of TBI remain controversial. METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort study involving patients with TBI who were registered in the National Trauma Data Bank between 2009 and 2011. Regression techniques with propensity score matching were used to investigate the association of helicopter transport with survival of patients with TBI, in comparison with ground EMS. RESULTS: During the study period, there were 209,529 patients with TBI who were registered in the National Trauma Data Bank and met the inclusion criteria. Of these patients, 35,334 were transported via helicopters and 174,195 via ground EMS. For patients transported to level I trauma centers, 2797 deaths (12%) were recorded after helicopter transport and 8161 (7.8%) after ground EMS. Multivariable logistic regression analysis demonstrated an association of helicopter transport with increased survival [OR (odds ratio), 1.95; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.81-2.10; absolute risk reduction (ARR), 6.37%]. This persisted after propensity score matching (OR, 1.88; 95% CI, 1.74-2.03; ARR, 5.93%). For patients transported to level II trauma centers, 1282 deaths (10.6%) were recorded after helicopter transport and 5097 (7.3%) after ground EMS. Multivariable logistic regression analysis demonstrated an association of helicopter transport with increased survival (OR, 1.81; 95% CI, 1.64-2.00; ARR 5.17%). This again persisted after propensity score matching (OR, 1.73; 95% CI, 1.55-1.94; ARR, 4.69). CONCLUSIONS: Helicopter transport of patients with TBI to level I and II trauma centers was associated with improved survival, in comparison with ground EMS.
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the association of helicopter transport with survival of patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI), in comparison with ground emergency medical services (EMS). BACKGROUND: Helicopter utilization and its effect on the outcomes of TBI remain controversial. METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort study involving patients with TBI who were registered in the National Trauma Data Bank between 2009 and 2011. Regression techniques with propensity score matching were used to investigate the association of helicopter transport with survival of patients with TBI, in comparison with ground EMS. RESULTS: During the study period, there were 209,529 patients with TBI who were registered in the National Trauma Data Bank and met the inclusion criteria. Of these patients, 35,334 were transported via helicopters and 174,195 via ground EMS. For patients transported to level I trauma centers, 2797 deaths (12%) were recorded after helicopter transport and 8161 (7.8%) after ground EMS. Multivariable logistic regression analysis demonstrated an association of helicopter transport with increased survival [OR (odds ratio), 1.95; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.81-2.10; absolute risk reduction (ARR), 6.37%]. This persisted after propensity score matching (OR, 1.88; 95% CI, 1.74-2.03; ARR, 5.93%). For patients transported to level II trauma centers, 1282 deaths (10.6%) were recorded after helicopter transport and 5097 (7.3%) after ground EMS. Multivariable logistic regression analysis demonstrated an association of helicopter transport with increased survival (OR, 1.81; 95% CI, 1.64-2.00; ARR 5.17%). This again persisted after propensity score matching (OR, 1.73; 95% CI, 1.55-1.94; ARR, 4.69). CONCLUSIONS: Helicopter transport of patients with TBI to level I and II trauma centers was associated with improved survival, in comparison with ground EMS.
Authors: Daniel P Davis; Jeremy Peay; Jennifer A Serrano; Colleen Buono; Gary M Vilke; Michael J Sise; Frank Kennedy; A Brent Eastman; Thomas Velky; David B Hoyt Journal: Ann Emerg Med Date: 2005-08 Impact factor: 5.721
Authors: Tolulope A Oyetunji; Joseph G Crompton; Imudia D Ehanire; Kent A Stevens; David T Efron; Elliott R Haut; David C Chang; Edward E Cornwell; Marie L Crandall; Adil H Haider Journal: J Surg Res Date: 2010-10-16 Impact factor: 2.192
Authors: Adil H Haider; Taimur Saleem; Jeffrey J Leow; Cassandra V Villegas; Mehreen Kisat; Eric B Schneider; Elliott R Haut; Kent A Stevens; Edward E Cornwell; Ellen J MacKenzie; David T Efron Journal: J Am Coll Surg Date: 2012-02-07 Impact factor: 6.113
Authors: Colman B Taylor; Mark Stevenson; Stephen Jan; Paul M Middleton; Michael Fitzharris; John A Myburgh Journal: Injury Date: 2010-01 Impact factor: 2.586
Authors: Joshua B Brown; Mark L Gestring; Francis X Guyette; Matthew R Rosengart; Nicole A Stassen; Raquel M Forsythe; Timothy R Billiar; Andrew B Peitzman; Jason L Sperry Journal: J Trauma Acute Care Surg Date: 2017-02 Impact factor: 3.313
Authors: Marc Blancher; François Albasini; Fidel Elsensohn; Ken Zafren; Natalie Hölzl; Kyle McLaughlin; Albert R Wheeler; Steven Roy; Hermann Brugger; Mike Greene; Peter Paal Journal: High Alt Med Biol Date: 2018-02-15 Impact factor: 1.981
Authors: John K Yue; Caitlin K Robinson; Ethan A Winkler; Pavan S Upadhyayula; John F Burke; Romain Pirracchio; Catherine G Suen; Hansen Deng; Laura B Ngwenya; Sanjay S Dhall; Geoffrey T Manley; Phiroz E Tarapore Journal: Neurobiol Sleep Circadian Rhythms Date: 2016-10-11
Authors: G Sumann; D Moens; B Brink; M Brodmann Maeder; M Greene; M Jacob; P Koirala; K Zafren; M Ayala; M Musi; K Oshiro; A Sheets; G Strapazzon; D Macias; P Paal Journal: Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med Date: 2020-12-14 Impact factor: 2.953