Mark R Scudder1, Kate Lambourne, Eric S Drollette, Stephen D Herrmann, Richard A Washburn, Joseph E Donnelly, Charles H Hillman. 1. 1Department of Kinesiology and Community Health, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL; 2Department of Internal Medicine, Cardiovascular Research Institute, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS; and 3Department of Health, Physical Education, and Recreation, Augustana College, Sioux Falls, SD.
Abstract
PURPOSE: The current study examined the relationship between children's performance on the Progressive Aerobic Cardiovascular Endurance Run subtest of the FitnessGram® and aspects of cognitive control that are believed to support academic success. METHODS: Hierarchical linear regression analyses were conducted on a sample of second- and third-grade children (n = 397) who completed modified versions of a flanker task and spatial n-back task to assess inhibitory control and working memory, respectively. RESULTS: Greater aerobic fitness was significantly related to shorter reaction time and superior accuracy during the flanker task, suggesting better inhibitory control and the facilitation of attention in higher-fit children. A similar result was observed for the n-back task such that higher-fit children exhibited more accurate target detection and discrimination performance when working memory demands were increased. CONCLUSIONS: These findings support the positive association between aerobic fitness and multiple aspects of cognitive control in a large sample of children, using a widely implemented and reliable field estimate of aerobic capacity. Importantly, the current results suggest that this relationship is consistent across methods used to assess fitness, which may have important implications for extending this research to more representative samples of children in a variety of experimental contexts.
PURPOSE: The current study examined the relationship between children's performance on the Progressive Aerobic Cardiovascular Endurance Run subtest of the FitnessGram® and aspects of cognitive control that are believed to support academic success. METHODS: Hierarchical linear regression analyses were conducted on a sample of second- and third-grade children (n = 397) who completed modified versions of a flanker task and spatial n-back task to assess inhibitory control and working memory, respectively. RESULTS: Greater aerobic fitness was significantly related to shorter reaction time and superior accuracy during the flanker task, suggesting better inhibitory control and the facilitation of attention in higher-fit children. A similar result was observed for the n-back task such that higher-fit children exhibited more accurate target detection and discrimination performance when working memory demands were increased. CONCLUSIONS: These findings support the positive association between aerobic fitness and multiple aspects of cognitive control in a large sample of children, using a widely implemented and reliable field estimate of aerobic capacity. Importantly, the current results suggest that this relationship is consistent across methods used to assess fitness, which may have important implications for extending this research to more representative samples of children in a variety of experimental contexts.
Authors: Laura Chaddock; Kirk I Erickson; Ruchika Shaurya Prakash; Matt VanPatter; Michelle W Voss; Matthew B Pontifex; Lauren B Raine; Charles H Hillman; Arthur F Kramer Journal: Dev Neurosci Date: 2010-08-06 Impact factor: 2.984
Authors: Russell R Pate; Michael G Davis; Thomas N Robinson; Elaine J Stone; Thomas L McKenzie; Judith C Young Journal: Circulation Date: 2006-08-14 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Keita Kamijo; Matthew B Pontifex; Kevin C O'Leary; Mark R Scudder; Chien-Ting Wu; Darla M Castelli; Charles H Hillman Journal: Dev Sci Date: 2011-04-25
Authors: Joseph E Donnelly; Charles H Hillman; Jerry L Greene; David M Hansen; Cheryl A Gibson; Debra K Sullivan; John Poggio; Matthew S Mayo; Kate Lambourne; Amanda N Szabo-Reed; Stephen D Herrmann; Jeffery J Honas; Mark R Scudder; Jessica L Betts; Katherine Henley; Suzanne L Hunt; Richard A Washburn Journal: Prev Med Date: 2017-02-11 Impact factor: 4.018
Authors: Shih-Chun Kao; Eric S Drollette; Mark R Scudder; Lauren B Raine; Daniel R Westfall; Matthew B Pontifex; Charles H Hillman Journal: J Mot Behav Date: 2016-08-11 Impact factor: 1.328
Authors: Dominika M Pindus; Eric S Drollette; Mark R Scudder; Naiman A Khan; Lauren B Raine; Lauren B Sherar; Dale W Esliger; Arthur F Kramer; Charles H Hillman Journal: J Pediatr Date: 2016-03-10 Impact factor: 4.406
Authors: Joseph E Donnelly; Charles H Hillman; Darla Castelli; Jennifer L Etnier; Sarah Lee; Phillip Tomporowski; Kate Lambourne; Amanda N Szabo-Reed Journal: Med Sci Sports Exerc Date: 2016-06 Impact factor: 5.411
Authors: Amanda N Szabo-Reed; Erik A Willis; Jaehoon Lee; Charles H Hillman; Richard A Washburn; Joseph E Donnelly Journal: Transl J Am Coll Sports Med Date: 2019-06-15
Authors: Daniel R Westfall; Shih-Chun Kao; Mark R Scudder; Matthew B Pontifex; Charles H Hillman Journal: Brain Cogn Date: 2017-02-02 Impact factor: 2.310
Authors: Anna Bugge; Jakob Tarp; Lars Østergaard; Sidsel Louise Domazet; Lars Bo Andersen; Karsten Froberg Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2014-09-18 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: Mona Have; Jacob Have Nielsen; Anne Kær Gejl; Martin Thomsen Ernst; Kjeld Fredens; Jan Toftegaard Støckel; Niels Wedderkopp; Sidsel Louise Domazet; Claire Gudex; Anders Grøntved; Peter Lund Kristensen Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2016-04-11 Impact factor: 3.295