Geert R D'Haens1, R Balfour Sartor2, Mark S Silverberg3, Joel Petersson4, Paul Rutgeerts5. 1. Department of Gastroenterology, Academic Medical Centre, University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands. Electronic address: g.dhaens@amc.uva.nl. 2. Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Multidisciplinary IBD Center, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC, USA. 3. Mount Sinai Hospital, University of Toronto, ON, Canada; The Zane Cohen Centre for Digestive Diseases, University of Toronto, ON, Canada. 4. Global Medical Affairs Gastroenterology, AbbVie, Rungis, France. 5. Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Catholic University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Clinical management of inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD), new treatment modalities and the potential impact of personalised medicine remain topics of intense interest as our understanding of the pathophysiology of IBD expands. METHODS: Potential future strategies for IBD management are discussed, based on recent preclinical and clinical research. RESULTS: A top-down approach to medical therapy is increasingly being adopted for patients with risk factors for severe inflammation or an unfavourable disease course in an attempt to halt the inflammatory process as early as possible, prevent complications and induce mucosal healing. In the future, biological therapies for IBD are likely to be used more selectively based on personalised benefit/risk assessment, determined through reliable biomarkers and tissue signatures, and will probably be optimised throughout the course of treatment. Biologics with different mechanisms of action will be available; when one drug fails, patients will be able to switch to another and even combination biologics may become a reality. The role of biotherapeutic products that are similar to currently licensed biologics in terms of quality, safety and efficacy - i.e. biosimilars - is at an early stage and requires further experience. Other therapeutic strategies may involve manipulation of the microbiome using antibiotics, probiotics, prebiotics, diet and combinations of all these approaches. Faecal microbiota transplantation is also a potential option in IBD although controlled data are lacking. CONCLUSIONS: The future of classifying, prognosticating and managing IBD involves an outcomes-based approach to identify biomarkers reflecting various biological processes that can be matched with clinically important endpoints.
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Clinical management of inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD), new treatment modalities and the potential impact of personalised medicine remain topics of intense interest as our understanding of the pathophysiology of IBD expands. METHODS: Potential future strategies for IBD management are discussed, based on recent preclinical and clinical research. RESULTS: A top-down approach to medical therapy is increasingly being adopted for patients with risk factors for severe inflammation or an unfavourable disease course in an attempt to halt the inflammatory process as early as possible, prevent complications and induce mucosal healing. In the future, biological therapies for IBD are likely to be used more selectively based on personalised benefit/risk assessment, determined through reliable biomarkers and tissue signatures, and will probably be optimised throughout the course of treatment. Biologics with different mechanisms of action will be available; when one drug fails, patients will be able to switch to another and even combination biologics may become a reality. The role of biotherapeutic products that are similar to currently licensed biologics in terms of quality, safety and efficacy - i.e. biosimilars - is at an early stage and requires further experience. Other therapeutic strategies may involve manipulation of the microbiome using antibiotics, probiotics, prebiotics, diet and combinations of all these approaches. Faecal microbiota transplantation is also a potential option in IBD although controlled data are lacking. CONCLUSIONS: The future of classifying, prognosticating and managing IBD involves an outcomes-based approach to identify biomarkers reflecting various biological processes that can be matched with clinically important endpoints.
Authors: Francesco De Francesco; Maurizio Romano; Laura Zarantonello; Cesare Ruffolo; Daniele Neri; Nicolò Bassi; Antonio Giordano; Giacomo Zanus; Giuseppe A Ferraro; Umberto Cillo Journal: Cancer Biol Ther Date: 2016-07-14 Impact factor: 4.742
Authors: Ana Gutiérrez; Pedro Zapater; Oriol Juanola; Laura Sempere; Marifé García; Raquel Laveda; Antonio Martínez; Michael Scharl; José M González-Navajas; José Such; Reiner Wiest; Gerhard Rogler; Rubén Francés Journal: Am J Gastroenterol Date: 2016-02-23 Impact factor: 10.864
Authors: Michael D Steury; Ho Jun Kang; Taehyung Lee; Peter C Lucas; Laura R McCabe; Narayanan Parameswaran Journal: Physiol Genomics Date: 2018-03-23 Impact factor: 3.107