Literature DB >> 24740516

Higher practice intensity is associated with higher quality of care but more avoidable admissions for medicare beneficiaries.

Bruce E Landon1, A James O'Malley, M Richard McKellar, Jack Hadley, James D Reschovsky.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The relationship between practice intensity and the quality and outcomes of care has not been studied.
OBJECTIVE: To examine the relationship between primary care physicians' costliness both for defined episodes of care and for defined patients and the quality and outcomes of care delivered to Medicare beneficiaries. STUDY
DESIGN: Cross sectional analysis of physician survey data linked to Medicare claims. Physician costliness measures were calculated by comparing the episode specific and overall costs of care for their patients with the care delivered by other physicians. PARTICIPANTS: We studied physicians participating in the 2004-2005 Community Tracking Study Physician Survey linked with administrative claims from the Medicare program for the years 2004-2006. MAIN MEASURES: Proportion of eligible beneficiaries receiving each of seven preventive services and rates of preventable admissions for acute and chronic conditions. KEY
RESULTS: The 2,211 primary care physician respondents included 937 internists and 1,274 family or general physicians who were linked to more than 250,000 Medicare enrollees. Patients treated by more costly physicians (whether measured by the overall costliness index or the episode-level index) were more likely to receive recommended preventive services, but were also more likely to experience preventable admissions. For instance, physicians in the lowest quartile of costliness performed appropriate monitoring for hemoglobin A1C for diabetics 72.8% of the time, as compared with 81.9% for physicians in the highest quartile of costliness (p < 0.01). In contrast, patients treated by the physicians in the lowest quartile of episode costliness were admitted at a rate of 1.8/100 for both acute and chronic Prevention Quality Indicators (PQIs), as compared with 2.9/100 for both acute and chronic PQIs for those treated by physicians in the highest quartile of costliness (p < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: Physician practice patterns are associated with the quality of preventive services delivered to Medicare patients. Ongoing efforts to influence physician practice patterns may have differential effects on different aspects of quality.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24740516      PMCID: PMC4099467          DOI: 10.1007/s11606-014-2840-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gen Intern Med        ISSN: 0884-8734            Impact factor:   5.128


  18 in total

1.  Medicare spending, the physician workforce, and beneficiaries' quality of care.

Authors:  Katherine Baicker; Amitabh Chandra
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2004 Jan-Jun       Impact factor: 6.301

2.  Measuring efficiency: the association of hospital costs and quality of care.

Authors:  Ashish K Jha; E John Orav; Allen Dobson; Robert A Book; Arnold M Epstein
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2009 May-Jun       Impact factor: 6.301

3.  Geographic variation in health care spending in the United States: insights from an Institute of Medicine report.

Authors:  Joseph P Newhouse; Alan M Garber
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2013-09-25       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  Predictors of overall quality of care provided to vulnerable older people.

Authors:  Lillian C Min; David B Reuben; Catherine H MacLean; Paul G Shekelle; David H Solomon; Takahiro Higashi; John T Chang; Carol P Roth; Caren J Kamberg; John Adams; Roy T Young; Neil S Wenger
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 5.562

5.  Delivery of preventive services to older adults by primary care physicians.

Authors:  Hoangmai H Pham; Deborah Schrag; J Lee Hargraves; Peter B Bach
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2005-07-27       Impact factor: 56.272

6.  The implications of regional variations in Medicare spending. Part 1: the content, quality, and accessibility of care.

Authors:  Elliott S Fisher; David E Wennberg; Thérèse A Stukel; Daniel J Gottlieb; F L Lucas; Etoile L Pinder
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2003-02-18       Impact factor: 25.391

7.  The association between quality of care and the intensity of diabetes disease management programs.

Authors:  Carol M Mangione; Robert B Gerzoff; David F Williamson; W Neil Steers; Eve A Kerr; Arleen F Brown; Beth E Waitzfelder; David G Marrero; R Adams Dudley; Catherine Kim; William Herman; Theodore J Thompson; Monika M Safford; Joe V Selby
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2006-07-18       Impact factor: 25.391

8.  Multimorbidity is associated with better quality of care among vulnerable elders.

Authors:  Lillian C Min; Neil S Wenger; Constance Fung; John T Chang; David A Ganz; Takahiro Higashi; Caren J Kamberg; Catherine H MacLean; Carol P Roth; David H Solomon; Roy T Young; David B Reuben
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 2.983

9.  Measuring quality of care in patients with multiple clinical conditions: summary of a conference conducted by the Society of General Internal Medicine.

Authors:  Rachel M Werner; Sheldon Greenfield; Constance Fung; Barbara J Turner
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2007-05-22       Impact factor: 5.128

10.  Hospital quality and intensity of spending: is there an association?

Authors:  Laura Yasaitis; Elliott S Fisher; Jonathan S Skinner; Amitabh Chandra
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2009-05-21       Impact factor: 9.048

View more
  1 in total

1.  Racial Disparities in Diabetes Hospitalization of Rural Medicare Beneficiaries in 8 Southeastern States.

Authors:  Thomas T H Wan; Yi-Ling Lin; Judith Ortiz
Journal:  Health Serv Res Manag Epidemiol       Date:  2016-10-07
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.