| Literature DB >> 24740153 |
Abstract
Highly homologous sequences 154-157 bp in length grouped under the name of "conserved non-protein-coding element" (CNE) were revealed in all of the sequenced genomes of baculoviruses belonging to the genus Alphabaculovirus. A CNE alignment led to the detection of a set of highly conserved nucleotide clusters that occupy strictly conserved positions in the CNE sequence. The significant length of the CNE and conservation of both its length and cluster architecture were identified as a combination of characteristics that make this CNE different from known viral non-coding functional sequences. The essential role of the CNE in the Alphabaculovirus life cycle was demonstrated through the use of a CNE-knockout Autographa californica multiple nucleopolyhedrovirus (AcMNPV) bacmid. It was shown that the essential function of the CNE was not mediated by the presumed expression activities of the protein- and non-protein-coding genes that overlap the AcMNPV CNE. On the basis of the presented data, the AcMNPV CNE was categorized as a complex-structured, polyfunctional genomic element involved in an essential DNA transaction that is associated with an undefined function of the baculovirus genome.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2014 PMID: 24740153 PMCID: PMC3989284 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0095322
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Figure 1Schematic representation of the viral genome fragments enclosing the CNE.
A. A BamHI fragment of the ManeMNPV genome (GenBank accession number for the ManeNPV genomic fragment sequence is KF460031). The location of the CNE, the linearization site, the hoar gene, and unidentified ORFs are indicated. B. A fragment of the AcMNPV genome (GenBank accession number for the complete AcMNPV genome sequence is NC_001623). The location of the CNE, the OFR152, the ie2 and pe38 genes are indicated. Nucleotide positions correspond to sequences deposited at GenBank.
The location of the conserved element and the ORFs that overlap this element in Alphabaculovirus genomes.
| N | Virus | Reference | Accession | Conserved element location | ORF location |
| 1 |
|
| NC_004690 | 8359–8514 | - |
| 2 |
|
| NC_011423 | 8164–8319 | - |
| 3 |
| - | NC_011345 | 6150–6304 | (5964-6200) |
| 4 |
|
| NC_007921 | 5925–6078 | - |
| 5 |
|
| NC_008035 | 120238–120393 | - |
| 6 |
|
| NC_008520 | (126126–126282) | - |
| 7 |
| - | NC_018504 | (118630–118795) | - |
| 8 |
|
| NC_001623 | 132228–132383 | (132109–132387) |
|
|
|
| NC_012672 | 121307–121462 | - |
| 10 |
|
| NC_001962 | 122075–122230 | - |
| 11 |
|
| NC_004778 | 124720–124874 | - |
| 12 |
|
| NC_005137 | (125538–125694) | 125536–125706 |
| 13 |
|
| NC_007151 | 6659–6813 | - |
| 14 |
|
| NC_008293 | (6290–6444) | - |
| 15 |
|
| NC_008586 | 6489–66444 | - |
| 16 |
|
| NC_003083 | 114636–114791 | - |
| 17 |
|
| NC_012639 | 5241–5395 | 5295–5465 |
| 18 |
| - | NC_011615 | 9236–9390 | - |
| 19 |
|
| NC_003094 | 5422–5576 | (5447–5638) |
| 20 |
|
| NC_007767 | 7138–7293 | 7249–7434 |
| 21 |
|
| NC_008348 | 8486–8641 | - |
| 22 |
|
| NC_001973 | 10032–10185 | (10115–10474) |
| 23 |
|
| NC_013953 | 8250–8383 | - |
| 24 |
| - | KF460031 | 1154–1308 | - |
| 25 |
| - | JQ_798165 | (9208–9362) | - |
| 26 |
|
| NC_003529 | (9030–9184) | 9003–9206 |
| 27 |
|
| NC_004117 | (9209–9363) | - |
| 28 |
|
| NC_008725 | 107517–107672 | (107491–107676) |
| 29 |
| - | NC_010276 | (5410–5565) | - |
| 30 |
|
| NC_001875 | (128282–128437) | 128186–128416 |
| 31 |
|
| NC_008349 | 132750–132905 | (132625–132909) |
| 32 |
|
| NC_004323 | 129845–13000 | (129726–130041) |
| 33 |
|
| NC_002169 | 5872–6026 | - |
| 34 |
|
| NC_009011 | 5084–5238 | 5124–6578 |
| 35 |
| - | NC_011616 | 5412–5567 | - |
| 36 |
|
| NC_003102 | 6030–6183 | - |
| 37 |
|
| JX467702 | 130810–130971 | (130802–130975) |
| 38 |
|
| NC_007383 | 5859–6015 | - |
Figure 2The profiles of CNE sequence conservation.
A. The consensus sequence determined by comparing the aligned CNEs of 38 alphabaculoviruses. The uppercase letters denote the completely conserved nucleotides, and the lowercase letters denote nucleotides with 50% or greater conservation. The letter “n” indicates that no completely or highly conserved nucleotides were found at the corresponding position. The points mark the positions in which the majority of the aligned sequences contain a gap. The clusters of conserved nucleotides are boxed, and each cluster is marked by the letter c, followed by a number. The lines mark dyad symmetry elements, each of which is indicated by the abbreviation DS in conjunction with the lowercase letters (l, c, r) that specify the DS position in the CNE (left, central, right, respectively). The inverted repeats are indicated with arrows, and the abbreviation IR in conjunction with the letters l, c, and r, assigns each IR pair to a particular DS. B. WebLogo for the ClustalW alignment of the CNEs. The CNE consensus sequence is represented graphically as stacks of letters, one stack for each position in the alignment: G is orange; T is red; C is blue; and A is green. The heights of the letters are a measure of nucleotide conservation. Two bits correspond to 100% conservation. The conserved clusters corresponding to those in the consensus sequence are underlined and marked.
Figure 3A comparative presentation of the organization of the genome region of the parental bacmid and the organization of the same regions of the recombinant genomes.
The recombinant genomes were derived from the Escherichia coli system for bacmid bMON14272. An egfp-producing virus (vAcEGFP) resulted from the insertion of a gentamicin-resistant gene (Gm)-enhanced green fluorescent protein gene (egfp) cassette into the polyhedrin (ph) locus of bMON14272 via transposon-mediated recombination using the Bac-to-Bac system (Invitrogen Life Technologies). The egfp-expressing CNE- and gp64-knockout bacmids, vAcCNE-KO-EGFP and vAcGP64-KO-EGFP, respectively, were constructed by replacing the CNE or gp64 in vAcEGFP with a chloramphenicol acetyltransferase gene (CAT) PCR cassette using the λ Red recombination system (see Methods for the PCR primers used). The same technique was used to generate a CNE-knockout virus lacking egfp (vAcCNE-KO) from bMON14272. vAcCNE-KO was used as an intermediate construct for the generation of the egfp-expressing CNE-repair virus (vACCNE-KO-EGFP-REP) by the site-specific transposition of the Gm-egfp-CNE cassette into the ph locus using the Bac-to-Bac system. Tn7L and Tn7R indicate the left and right transposon arms, respectively. The arrows, labeled Pp10 and Pph, denote the ph and p10 promoters, respectively, and the unlabeled arrows denote native gene promoters. The arrowheads labeled with numbers specify the annealing sites of the respective primers. The boxes labeled by gene names represent the corresponding genes. Different types of shading were used to represent each gene in a visually appealing form. The unshaded arrow-shaped boxes indicate the complete and truncated ORF152, and the black arrow above the boxes specifies the CNE location within ORF152.
Figure 4The analysis of the infectivity of vAcEGFP, vAcCNE-KO-EGFP, vAcCNE-KO-REP-EGFP, and vAcGP64-KO-EGFP.
A. Cells transfected with DNA from the indicated constructs (the top row of images) and cells inoculated with the supernatants harvested from the transfected cells (the bottom row of images). The images were captured at 96 h p.t. and at 96 h p.i. B. Confirmation of vAcCNE-KO-REP-EGFP infectivity. A 1.4-kbp fragment indicative of the CNE located in the ph locus and a 0.4-kbp fragment indicative of the CNE located in its original position were amplified using a mixture of vAcCNE-KO-REP-EGFP and vAcCNE-KO-EGFP DNA as the template in combination with primers 7 and 8 (see Materials and Methods) (line 1). PCR using the same primers and template DNA purified from vAcCNE-KO-REP-EGFP-transfected (line 2) or -infected (line 3) cells resulted in the amplification of a 1.4-kbp fragment indicative of the CNE in the ph locus. C. Analysis of the CNE and gp64 loci of viral DNA by PCR. The DNA fragments represented on an electropherogram were amplified using the indicated pairs of primers (see Materials and Methods) and template DNA purified from Sf9 cells transfected with vAcGP64-KO-EGFP- (lines 1,1′), vAcCNE-KO-EGFP (lines 2, 2′), and vAcGP64-KO-EGFP+vAcCNE-KO-EGFP (lines 3, 3′) and from Sf9 cells inoculated with supernatants harvested from the above-mentioned cells lines 4 and 4′, lines 5 and 5′, and lines 6 and 6′, respectively. The sizes of the fragments marked on the left indicate the following: a 0.2-kbp DNA fragment, identifying an intact CNE locus characteristic of vAcGP64-KO-EGFP and restored vAcEGFP; 1.5-kbp DNA fragments, identifying an intact gp64 locus characteristic of vAcCNE-KO-EGFP and the restored vAcEGFP; 1.2-kbp DNA fragments, identifying both CNE and gp64 loci with native sequences substituted with CAT (the 1.2-kbp fragment amplified by the CNE-specific primers is indicative of vAcCNE-KO-EGFP, and the 1.2-kbp fragment amplified by the gp64 locus-specific primers is indicative of vAcGP64-KO-EGFP).