Literature DB >> 24739801

Can we identify response markers to antihypertensive drugs? First results from the IDEAL Trial.

F Gueyffier1, F Subtil2, T Bejan-Angoulvant3, Y Zerbib4, J P Baguet5, J M Boivin6, A Mercier7, G Leftheriotis8, J P Gagnol9, J P Fauvel10, C Giraud1, G Bricca11, D Maucort-Boulch12, S Erpeldinger13.   

Abstract

Current antihypertensive strategies do not take into account that individual characteristics may influence the magnitude of blood pressure (BP) reduction. Guidelines promote trial-and-error approaches with many different drugs. We conducted the Identification of the Determinants of the Efficacy of Arterial blood pressure Lowering drugs (IDEAL) Trial to identify factors associated with BP responses to perindopril and indapamide. IDEAL was a cross-over, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, involving four 4-week periods: indapamide, perindopril and two placebo. Eligible patients were untreated, hypertensive and aged 25-70 years. The main outcome was systolic BP (SBP) response to drugs. The 112 participants with good compliance had a mean age of 52. One in every three participants was a woman. In middle-aged women, the SBP reduction from drugs was -11.5 mm Hg (indapamide) and -8.3 mm Hg (perindopril). In men, the response was significantly smaller: -4.8 mm Hg (indapamide) and -4.3 (perindopril) (P for sex differences 0.001 and 0.015, respectively). SBP response to perindopril decreased by 2 mm Hg every 10 years of age in both sexes (P=0.01). The response to indapamide increased by 3 mm Hg every 10 years of age gradient in women (P=0.02). Age and sex were important determinants of BP response for antihypertensive drugs in the IDEAL population. This should be taken into account when choosing drugs a priori.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24739801     DOI: 10.1038/jhh.2014.29

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Hum Hypertens        ISSN: 0950-9240            Impact factor:   3.012


  17 in total

1.  Cardiovascular protection and blood pressure reduction: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  J A Staessen; J G Wang; L Thijs
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2001-10-20       Impact factor: 79.321

2.  Common genetic variation of beta1- and beta2-adrenergic receptor and response to four classes of antihypertensive treatment.

Authors:  Timo Suonsyrjä; Kati Donner; Tuula Hannila-Handelberg; Heidi Fodstad; Kimmo Kontula; Timo P Hiltunen
Journal:  Pharmacogenet Genomics       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 2.089

3.  Meta-analysis of continuous outcomes combining individual patient data and aggregate data.

Authors:  Richard D Riley; Paul C Lambert; Jan A Staessen; Jiguang Wang; Francois Gueyffier; Lutgarde Thijs; Florent Boutitie
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2008-05-20       Impact factor: 2.373

4.  The IDEAL study : towards personalized drug treatment of hypertension.

Authors:  Theodora Bejan-Angoulvant; Jean-Philippe Baguet; Sylvie Erpeldinger; Jean-Marc Boivin; Alain Mercier; Georges Leftheriotis; Jean-Pierre Gagnol; Jean-Pierre Fauvel; Céline Giraud; Giampiero Bricca; François Gueyffier
Journal:  Therapie       Date:  2012-08-09       Impact factor: 2.070

5.  Monitoring initial response to Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor-based regimens: an individual patient data meta-analysis from randomized, placebo-controlled trials.

Authors:  Katy J L Bell; Andrew Hayen; Petra Macaskill; Jonathan C Craig; Bruce C Neal; Kim M Fox; Willem J Remme; Folkert W Asselbergs; Wiek H van Gilst; Stephen Macmahon; Giuseppe Remuzzi; Piero Ruggenenti; Koon K Teo; Les Irwig
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  2010-07-12       Impact factor: 10.190

6.  Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and calcium channel blockers for coronary heart disease and stroke prevention.

Authors:  Paolo Verdecchia; Gianpaolo Reboldi; Fabio Angeli; Roberto Gattobigio; Maurizio Bentivoglio; Lutgarde Thijs; Jan A Staessen; Carlo Porcellati
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  2005-07-11       Impact factor: 10.190

7.  Optimisation of antihypertensive treatment by crossover rotation of four major classes.

Authors:  J E Dickerson; A D Hingorani; M J Ashby; C R Palmer; M J Brown
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1999-06-12       Impact factor: 79.321

8.  Laboratory tests as predictors of the antihypertensive effects of amlodipine, bisoprolol, hydrochlorothiazide and losartan in men: results from the randomized, double-blind, crossover GENRES Study.

Authors:  Timo Suonsyrjä; Tuula Hannila-Handelberg; Kristian J Paavonen; Helena E Miettinen; Kati Donner; Timo Strandberg; Ilkka Tikkanen; Reijo Tilvis; Pertti J Pentikäinen; Kimmo Kontula; Timo P Hiltunen
Journal:  J Hypertens       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 4.844

9.  Within-patient correlation between the antihypertensive effects of atenolol, lisinopril and nifedipine.

Authors:  S Attwood; R Bird; K Burch; B Casadei; A Coats; J Conway; M Dawes; D Ebbs; A Farmer; J Robinson
Journal:  J Hypertens       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 4.844

10.  Value of low dose combination treatment with blood pressure lowering drugs: analysis of 354 randomised trials.

Authors:  M R Law; N J Wald; J K Morris; R E Jordan
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2003-06-28
View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  Hypertension Across a Woman's Life Cycle.

Authors:  Nanette K Wenger; Anita Arnold; C Noel Bairey Merz; Rhonda M Cooper-DeHoff; Keith C Ferdinand; Jerome L Fleg; Martha Gulati; Ijeoma Isiadinso; Dipti Itchhaporia; KellyAnn Light-McGroary; Kathryn J Lindley; Jennifer H Mieres; Mary L Rosser; George R Saade; Mary Norine Walsh; Carl J Pepine
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2018-04-24       Impact factor: 24.094

2.  Blood pressure response to metoprolol and chlorthalidone in European and African Americans with hypertension.

Authors:  Mai Mehanna; Yan Gong; Caitrin W McDonough; Amber L Beitelshees; John G Gums; Arlene B Chapman; Gary L Schwartz; Julie A Johnson; Stephen T Turner; Rhonda M Cooper-DeHoff
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2017-09-21       Impact factor: 3.738

3.  Antihypertensive drug treatment: the real-life challenge.

Authors:  Konstantinos P Imprialos; Konstantinos Stavropoulos; Michael Doumas
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2017-12-08       Impact factor: 3.738

Review 4.  Advances in understanding the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) in blood pressure control and recent pivotal trials of RAAS blockade in heart failure and diabetic nephropathy.

Authors:  Lama Ghazi; Paul Drawz
Journal:  F1000Res       Date:  2017-03-21

Review 5.  Sex differences in hypertension. Do we need a sex-specific guideline?

Authors:  Renata Cífková; Larysa Strilchuk
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2022-08-23
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.