Literature DB >> 16009786

Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and calcium channel blockers for coronary heart disease and stroke prevention.

Paolo Verdecchia1, Gianpaolo Reboldi, Fabio Angeli, Roberto Gattobigio, Maurizio Bentivoglio, Lutgarde Thijs, Jan A Staessen, Carlo Porcellati.   

Abstract

We investigated whether protection from coronary heart disease (CHD) and stroke conferred by angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) and calcium channel blockers (CCBs) in hypertensive or high-risk patients may be explained by the specific drug regimen. We extracted summary statistics regarding CHD and stroke from 28 outcome trials that compared either ACEIs or CCBs with diuretics, beta-blockers, or placebo for a total of 179,122 patients, 9509 incident cases of CHD, and 5971 cases of stroke. CHD included myocardial infarction and coronary death. In placebo-controlled trials, ACEIs decreased the risk of CHD (P<0.001), and CCBs reduced stroke incidence (P<0.001). There were no significant differences in CHD risk between regimens based on diuretics/beta-blockers and regimens based on ACEIs (P=0.46) or CCBs (P=0.52). The risk of stroke was reduced by CCBs (P=0.041) but not by ACEIs (P=0.15) compared with diuretics/beta-blockers. Because heterogeneity between trials was significant, we investigated potential sources of heterogeneity by metaregression. Examined covariates were the reduction in systolic blood pressure (BP), drug treatment (ACEIs versus CCBs), their interaction term, sex, age at randomization, year of publication, and duration of treatment. Prevention of CHD was explained by systolic BP reduction (P<0.001) and use of ACEIs (P=0.028), whereas prevention of stroke was explained by systolic BP reduction (P=0.001) and use of CCBs (P=0.042). These findings confirm that BP lowering is fundamental for prevention of CHD and stroke. However, over and beyond BP reduction, ACEIs appear superior to CCBs for prevention of CHD, whereas CCBs appear superior to ACEIs for prevention of stroke.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16009786     DOI: 10.1161/01.HYP.0000174591.42889.a2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hypertension        ISSN: 0194-911X            Impact factor:   10.190


  66 in total

Review 1.  Rationale for the use of a fixed-dose combination in the management of hypertension: efficacy and tolerability of lercanidipine/enalapril.

Authors:  Claudio Borghi; Arrigo F G Cicero
Journal:  Clin Drug Investig       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 2.859

Review 2.  Arterial stiffness: is it ready for prime time?

Authors:  Stanley S Franklin
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 2.931

3.  Missed opportunities for the secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease in Canada.

Authors:  Daniel G Hackam; Lawrence A Leiter; Andrew T Yan; Raymond T Yan; Aurora Mendelsohn; Mary Tan; Louis Zavodni; Richard Chen; Jennifer L Tsang; Anjali Kundi; Peter J Lin; David H Fitchett; Anatoly Langer; Shaun G Goodman
Journal:  Can J Cardiol       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 5.223

4.  Imidapril: will fewer adverse events translate into better long-term outcomes?

Authors:  Tom Richart; Jan A Staessen; Willem H Birkenhäger
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 5.  Drugs for cardiovascular disease prevention in women: implications of the AHA Guidelines--2007 Update.

Authors:  Nanette K Wenger
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 9.546

6.  More about the "ARB MI paradox".

Authors:  Alistair S Hall; Martin H Strauss
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 5.994

7.  Will generic hypertension guidelines reduce the proliferation of directives?

Authors:  Jan A Staessen; Eoin O'Brien
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 5.994

Review 8.  Do pleiotropic effects of antihypertensive medications exist or is it all about the blood pressure?

Authors:  Domenic A Sica
Journal:  Curr Hypertens Rep       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 5.369

9.  Reducing blood pressure in people of different ages.

Authors:  Jan A Staessen; Tom Richart; Paolo Verdecchia
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2008-05-14

Review 10.  Choosing the ideal drug for hypertension after ischemic stroke.

Authors:  Eduard Rozner; Arnold Eggers; Daniel Rosenbaum
Journal:  Curr Hypertens Rep       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 5.369

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.