Rosaly Correa-de-Araujo1, Evan Hadley. 1. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Division of Geriatrics and Clinical Gerontology, National Institute on Aging, National Institutes of Health, 7201 Wisconsin Avenue, Bethesda, MD 20892-9205. Rosaly.correa-de-araujo@nih.gov.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Concerns remain as to the best terminology to embrace sarcopenia's evolving conceptualization. Many of these concerns stem from the fact that age-related decrements in muscle performance associated with physical impairment are only partially explained by decreases in muscle mass and that other pathophysiologic factors contribute to age-related impairments in muscle performance. METHODS: Review of literature on the evolving conceptualization of sarcopenia since its early definition in 1989 and concerns with terminology. RESULTS: Early definitions of sarcopenia were based solely on muscle mass in relationship to the range of muscle within a reference population. Subsequent definitions added performance criteria to muscle mass alone. The Foundation for the National Institutes of Health Sarcopenia Project identified criteria for clinically relevant low muscle strength (weakness) and low lean mass. Progress on the sarcopenia's evolving definitions has not been accompanied by recommendations on specific terminologies that address the lack of sufficient specificity from the use of an anatomic term to define a functional condition with numerous now known nonanatomic contributory factors. Skeletal Muscle Function Deficit is a broader construct that accommodates a set of diagnoses that includes both sarcopenia and other age-related muscle dysfunctions. CONCLUSIONS: Skeletal Muscle Function Deficit is proposed as a new terminology to embrace the evolving conceptualization of sarcopenia and other age-related muscle dysfunctions. It comprises a variety of contributory etiologies and has the potential to provide a framework for developing diagnostic categories that are useful for both clinical practice and research.
BACKGROUND: Concerns remain as to the best terminology to embrace sarcopenia's evolving conceptualization. Many of these concerns stem from the fact that age-related decrements in muscle performance associated with physical impairment are only partially explained by decreases in muscle mass and that other pathophysiologic factors contribute to age-related impairments in muscle performance. METHODS: Review of literature on the evolving conceptualization of sarcopenia since its early definition in 1989 and concerns with terminology. RESULTS: Early definitions of sarcopenia were based solely on muscle mass in relationship to the range of muscle within a reference population. Subsequent definitions added performance criteria to muscle mass alone. The Foundation for the National Institutes of Health Sarcopenia Project identified criteria for clinically relevant low muscle strength (weakness) and low lean mass. Progress on the sarcopenia's evolving definitions has not been accompanied by recommendations on specific terminologies that address the lack of sufficient specificity from the use of an anatomic term to define a functional condition with numerous now known nonanatomic contributory factors. Skeletal Muscle Function Deficit is a broader construct that accommodates a set of diagnoses that includes both sarcopenia and other age-related muscle dysfunctions. CONCLUSIONS: Skeletal Muscle Function Deficit is proposed as a new terminology to embrace the evolving conceptualization of sarcopenia and other age-related muscle dysfunctions. It comprises a variety of contributory etiologies and has the potential to provide a framework for developing diagnostic categories that are useful for both clinical practice and research.
Authors: R N Baumgartner; K M Koehler; D Gallagher; L Romero; S B Heymsfield; R R Ross; P J Garry; R D Lindeman Journal: Am J Epidemiol Date: 1998-04-15 Impact factor: 4.897
Authors: John E Morley; Angela Marie Abbatecola; Josep M Argiles; Vickie Baracos; Juergen Bauer; Shalender Bhasin; Tommy Cederholm; Andrew J Stewart Coats; Steven R Cummings; William J Evans; Kenneth Fearon; Luigi Ferrucci; Roger A Fielding; Jack M Guralnik; Tamara B Harris; Akio Inui; Kamyar Kalantar-Zadeh; Bridget-Anne Kirwan; Giovanni Mantovani; Maurizio Muscaritoli; Anne B Newman; Filippo Rossi-Fanelli; Giuseppe M C Rosano; Ronenn Roubenoff; Morris Schambelan; Gerald H Sokol; Thomas W Storer; Bruno Vellas; Stephan von Haehling; Shing-Shing Yeh; Stefan D Anker Journal: J Am Med Dir Assoc Date: 2011-07 Impact factor: 4.669
Authors: Alfonso J Cruz-Jentoft; Jean Pierre Baeyens; Jürgen M Bauer; Yves Boirie; Tommy Cederholm; Francesco Landi; Finbarr C Martin; Jean-Pierre Michel; Yves Rolland; Stéphane M Schneider; Eva Topinková; Maurits Vandewoude; Mauro Zamboni Journal: Age Ageing Date: 2010-04-13 Impact factor: 10.668
Authors: M Muscaritoli; S D Anker; J Argilés; Z Aversa; J M Bauer; G Biolo; Y Boirie; I Bosaeus; T Cederholm; P Costelli; K C Fearon; A Laviano; M Maggio; F Rossi Fanelli; S M Schneider; A Schols; C C Sieber Journal: Clin Nutr Date: 2010-01-08 Impact factor: 7.324
Authors: W Kyle Mitchell; John Williams; Philip Atherton; Mike Larvin; John Lund; Marco Narici Journal: Front Physiol Date: 2012-07-11 Impact factor: 4.566
Authors: Robert R McLean; Michelle D Shardell; Dawn E Alley; Peggy M Cawthon; Maren S Fragala; Tamara B Harris; Anne M Kenny; Katherine W Peters; Luigi Ferrucci; Jack M Guralnik; Stephen B Kritchevsky; Douglas P Kiel; Maria T Vassileva; Qian-Li Xue; Subashan Perera; Stephanie A Studenski; Thuy-Tien L Dam Journal: J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci Date: 2014-05 Impact factor: 6.053
Authors: Stephanie A Studenski; Katherine W Peters; Dawn E Alley; Peggy M Cawthon; Robert R McLean; Tamara B Harris; Luigi Ferrucci; Jack M Guralnik; Maren S Fragala; Anne M Kenny; Douglas P Kiel; Stephen B Kritchevsky; Michelle D Shardell; Thuy-Tien L Dam; Maria T Vassileva Journal: J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci Date: 2014-05 Impact factor: 6.053
Authors: Robert D Boutin; Sara Bamrungchart; Cyrus P Bateni; Daniel P Beavers; Kristen M Beavers; John P Meehan; Leon Lenchik Journal: AJR Am J Roentgenol Date: 2017-03-07 Impact factor: 3.959
Authors: H A Bischoff-Ferrari; J E Orav; J A Kanis; R Rizzoli; M Schlögl; H B Staehelin; W C Willett; B Dawson-Hughes Journal: Osteoporos Int Date: 2015-06-12 Impact factor: 4.507
Authors: Carlos J Padilla; Markus E Harrigan; Hallie Harris; Jan M Schwab; Seward B Rutkove; Mark M Rich; Brian C Clark; W David Arnold Journal: Geroscience Date: 2021-04-24 Impact factor: 7.713