Literature DB >> 24737536

Computer simulation of dental professionals as a moral community.

David W Chambers1.   

Abstract

Current empirical studies of moral behavior of healthcare professionals are almost entirely focused on self-reports, usually collected under the assumption that an ethical disposition characterizes individuals across various contexts. It is well known, however, that individuals adjust their behavior to what they see being done by those in their peer group. That presents a methodological challenge to traditional research within a community of peers because the behavior of each individual is both the result of norms and a contributor to the norms of others. Computer simulations can be used to address this methodological challenge. A Markov replicator model that runs on an Excel spreadsheet was used to investigate a community with four agent types in the dental community: devious practitioners, ethical practitioners who avoid involvement in the poor ethics of others, ethical practitioners who accept it as part of their professional responsibility to challenge colleagues who act unprofessionally, and those who enforce ethical standards. A panel of leaders in the profession independently estimated parameters for the model and criteria for a possible distribution of agent types in the community. The simulation converged on distributions of the agent types that were very similar to the expectations of the panel. The simulation suggests the following characteristics of such moral communities: The structure of such communities is robust across a wide distribution. It appears that reduction in unethical behavior is more sensitive to the way ethical practitioners interact with each other than to sanctions the enforcement community imposes on unethical practitioners, and that large external interventions will be short lived.

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24737536     DOI: 10.1007/s11019-014-9556-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Health Care Philos        ISSN: 1386-7423


  11 in total

1.  Issues of academic integrity in U.S. dental schools.

Authors:  P L Beemsterboer; J G Odom; T D Pate; N K Haden
Journal:  J Dent Educ       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 2.264

2.  Enhancing ethical behavior: views of students, administrators, and faculty.

Authors:  Anne Koerber; Ronald W Botto; Darryl D Pendleton; Michael B Albazzaz; Siddhi J Doshi; Victoria A Rinando
Journal:  J Dent Educ       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 2.264

3.  Disciplinary action by medical boards and prior behavior in medical school.

Authors:  Maxine A Papadakis; Arianne Teherani; Mary A Banach; Timothy R Knettler; Susan L Rattner; David T Stern; J Jon Veloski; Carol S Hodgson
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2005-12-22       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  Motivational and emotional aspects of the self.

Authors:  Mark R Leary
Journal:  Annu Rev Psychol       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 24.137

5.  Faculty and student perceptions of academic integrity at U.S. and Canadian dental schools.

Authors:  Kenneth G Andrews; Linda A Smith; David Henzi; Elaine Demps
Journal:  J Dent Educ       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 2.264

6.  Suckers or saviors? Consistent contributors in social dilemmas.

Authors:  J Mark Weber; J Keith Murnighan
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  2008-12

7.  Are shame, guilt, and embarrassment distinct emotions?

Authors:  J P Tangney; R S Miller; L Flicker; D H Barlow
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  1996-06

8.  Do dental students cheat?

Authors:  J L Fuller; D E Killip
Journal:  J Dent Educ       Date:  1979-12       Impact factor: 2.264

9.  Cooperative behavior cascades in human social networks.

Authors:  James H Fowler; Nicholas A Christakis
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-03-08       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Risk factors at medical school for subsequent professional misconduct: multicentre retrospective case-control study.

Authors:  Janet Yates; David James
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2010-04-27
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.