Literature DB >> 24736293

Assessment of accuracy of marker ball placement in pre-operative templating for total hip arthroplasty.

Victoria F Sinclair1, James Wilson1, Neil P M Jain2, David Knowles1.   

Abstract

We report the accuracy of positioning of the calibration ball in the process of pre-operative templating for total hip arthroplasty (THA). The ball should be placed in the coronal plane of the hip to provide suitable accuracy. We reviewed 112 post-operative THA radiographs where a calibration ball had been placed. We templated the femoral head size of the implant after calibrating the templating system from the ball. The calibrated femoral head diameter was compared to the known prosthetic head size. A percentage error was calculated. Overall, incorrect placement of the calibration ball resulted in a mean percentage error in templating of 6.8% (median 5.7%; range 0-26%). Such error carries implications with the templating process and may result in incorrect component sizes, leg lengths and offset.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  marker ball; position; templating; total hip arthroplasty

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24736293     DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2014.03.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Arthroplasty        ISSN: 0883-5403            Impact factor:   4.757


  15 in total

1.  Inaccuracies in the Use of Magnification Markers in Digital Hip Radiographs.

Authors:  Michael J Archibeck; Tamara Cummins; Krishna R Tripuraneni; Joshua T Carothers; Cristina Murray-Krezan; Mohammad Hattab; Richard E White
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2016-01-21       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  CORR Insights(®): acetate templating on digital images is more accurate than computer-based templating for total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Michael D Ries
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2015-05-27       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Dual-position calibration markers for total hip arthroplasty: theoretical comparison to fixed calibration and single marker method.

Authors:  Christoph Kolja Boese; Sebastian Wilhelm; Stefan Haneder; Philipp Lechler; Peer Eysel; Jan Bredow
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2018-06-20       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  Digital templating without a calibration marker is accurate at predicting implant size for hip hemiarthroplasty.

Authors:  Mina Derias; Muhammad A Khan; Jamie Buchanan
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2018-09-12       Impact factor: 3.693

5.  Acetate templating on digital images is more accurate than computer-based templating for total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Robert Petretta; Jason Strelzow; Nicholas E Ohly; Peter Misur; Bassam A Masri
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  Assessment of magnification of digital radiographs in total HIP arthroplasty.

Authors:  Nuria I Olmedo-Garcia; Jose L Martínez Vergara; Tamara L Aparici Miralles; Juan V Sánchez Andrés; Adela Mesado Vives; Encarna Cruz Renovell; Vicente Granell Beltran
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2018-08-24

7.  Calibration Markers for Digital Templating in Total Hip Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Christoph Kolja Boese; Philipp Lechler; Leonard Rose; Jens Dargel; Johannes Oppermann; Peer Eysel; Hansjörg Geiges; Jan Bredow
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-07-13       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Scaling Marker Position Determines the Accuracy of Digital Templating for Total Hip Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Austin J Ramme; Nina D Fisher; Jonathan Egol; Gregory Chang; Jonathan M Vigdorchik
Journal:  HSS J       Date:  2017-09-12

9.  Use of Acetate Templates Over Digital Radiographs for Templating in Total Hip Arthroplasty: Technique and Its Validation.

Authors:  Tarun Goyal; Siddharth S Sethy; Sajid Ansari; Lakshmana Das; Souvik Paul
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2020-11-03       Impact factor: 1.251

10.  Magnification of digital hip radiographs differs between clinical workplaces.

Authors:  Jana Hornová; Pavel Růžička; Maroš Hrubina; Eduard Šťastný; Andrea Košková; Petr Fulín; Jiří Gallo; Matej Daniel
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-11-30       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.