Literature DB >> 24735733

Show me the Money: the impact of actual rewards and losses on the feedback negativity.

Anna Weinberg1, Anja Riesel2, Greg Hajcak Proudfit3.   

Abstract

The feedback negativity (FN) is an event-related potential component which is typically conceptualized as a negativity in response to losses that is absent in response to gains. However, there is also evidence that variation in the FN reflects the neural response to gains. The present study sought to explore these possibilities by manipulating the context in which loss and gain feedback was presented in a straightforward gambling task. In half the blocks, participants could win or lose money (Value condition), and in half the blocks, participants could not win or lose any money (No Value condition). The degree to which losses and gains were differentiated from one another (i.e., the ΔFN) was greater in the Value condition than in the No Value condition. Furthermore, though the responses to loss feedback and gain feedback were each enhanced in the Value condition relative to the No-Value condition, the effect of the monetary manipulation was substantially larger for the positivity to gains than the negativity to losses. This is consistent with the notion that the FN might reflect two independent processes, but that variation in the FN depends more upon the response to rewards than losses.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Feedback negativity; Monetary incentives; Reward processing

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24735733     DOI: 10.1016/j.bandc.2014.03.015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Cogn        ISSN: 0278-2626            Impact factor:   2.310


  15 in total

1.  Neural responses to social and monetary reward in early adolescence and emerging adulthood.

Authors:  Paige Ethridge; Autumn Kujawa; Melanie A Dirks; Kodi B Arfer; Ellen M Kessel; Daniel N Klein; Anna Weinberg
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2017-07-12       Impact factor: 4.016

2.  Shifts in attentional scope modulate event-related potentials evoked by reward.

Authors:  Ajay Nadig; Nicholas J Kelley; Narun Pornpattananangkul; James E Glazer; Robin Nusslock
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 3.282

3.  Effort provides its own reward: endeavors reinforce subjective expectation and evaluation of task performance.

Authors:  Lei Wang; Jiehui Zheng; Liang Meng
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2017-01-25       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Interpersonal relationships modulate outcome evaluation in a social comparison context: The pain and pleasure of intimacy.

Authors:  Huoyin Zhang; Mingming Zhang; Jiachen Lu; Lili Zhao; Dongfang Zhao; Chuan Xiao; Ruolei Gu; Wenbo Luo
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2020-02       Impact factor: 3.282

5.  Expectancy effects in feedback processing are explained primarily by time-frequency delta not theta.

Authors:  Adreanna T M Watts; Matthew D Bachman; Edward M Bernat
Journal:  Biol Psychol       Date:  2017-09-01       Impact factor: 3.251

6.  Effects of reward context on feedback processing as indexed by time-frequency analysis.

Authors:  Adreanna T M Watts; Edward M Bernat
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2018-05-11       Impact factor: 4.016

7.  Blunted neural response to rewards as a vulnerability factor for depression: Results from a family study.

Authors:  Anna Weinberg; Huiting Liu; Greg Hajcak; Stewart A Shankman
Journal:  J Abnorm Psychol       Date:  2015-07-27

8.  Processing of fair and unfair offers in the ultimatum game under social observation.

Authors:  Jutta Peterburs; Rolf Voegler; Roman Liepelt; Anna Schulze; Saskia Wilhelm; Sebastian Ocklenburg; Thomas Straube
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-03-09       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Monetary Incentives Modulate Feedback-related Brain Activity.

Authors:  Shuting Mei; Qi Li; Xun Liu; Ya Zheng
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-08-09       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Longitudinal increases in reward-related neural activity in early adolescence: Evidence from event-related potentials (ERPs).

Authors:  Kreshnik Burani; Elizabeth M Mulligan; Julia Klawohn; Katherine R Luking; Brady D Nelson; Greg Hajcak
Journal:  Dev Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2019-01-24       Impact factor: 6.464

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.