Literature DB >> 24735171

A comparison of adverse reaction rates for PAS C versus plasma platelet units.

Claudia S Cohn1, James Stubbs, Joseph Schwartz, Richard Francis, Cheryl Goss, Melissa Cushing, Beth Shaz, David Mair, Barbara Brantigan, W Andrew Heaton.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Plasma constituents have been implicated in some types of platelet (PLT) transfusion reactions. Leukoreduced apheresis PLTs stored in InterSol have 65% less plasma than apheresis PLTs stored in 100% plasma (PPs). This study compared transfusion reaction rates in InterSol PLTs (PLT additive solution [PAS] C) versus PPs. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: The study design was an open-label, nonrandomized retrospective review. Statistical methods were applied to substantiate noninferiority and superiority of PAS C compared to PP in terms of transfusion reaction rates. Adverse reactions (ARs) were categorized using the Biovigilance Component of the National Healthcare Safety Network. Active surveillance was used to monitor all transfusions, both with ARs and without ARs.
RESULTS: A total of 14,005 transfusions from six study sites were included, with 9845 PP transfusions given to 2202 patients and 4160 PAS C to 1444 patients. A total of 165 ARs were reported. Percentages of transfusions with ARs were 1.37% for PPs, 0.55% for PAS C, and 1.13% overall. The relative risk (RR) for PAS C versus PPs was calculated as 0.403 with an upper confidence limit (UCL) of 0.663. Overall, ARs with the highest incidence were allergic transfusion reactions (ATRs) and febrile nonhemolytic transfusion reactions (FNHTRs), at 0.66 and 0.40% of total transfusions reported, respectively. The relative risks (UCLs) for ATRs and FNHTRs, respectively, were 0.350 (0.686) and 0.336 (0.827).
CONCLUSIONS: PAS C PLTs were statistically superior and noninferior to PPs with respect to the transfusion-related AR rate. PAS C noninferiority and superiority were also demonstrated for ATRs and FNHTRs, separately.
© 2014 AABB.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24735171     DOI: 10.1111/trf.12597

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transfusion        ISSN: 0041-1132            Impact factor:   3.157


  12 in total

Review 1.  A Comparison of Transfusion-Related Adverse Reactions Among Apheresis Platelets, Whole Blood-Derived Platelets, and Platelets Subjected to Pathogen Reduction Technology as Reported to the National Healthcare Safety Network Hemovigilance Module.

Authors:  Sanjida J Mowla; Ian T Kracalik; Mathew R P Sapiano; Lynne O'Hearn; Chester Andrzejewski; Sridhar V Basavaraju
Journal:  Transfus Med Rev       Date:  2021-04-02

2.  Passive haemovigilance of blood components treated with a riboflavin-based pathogen reduction technology.

Authors:  Dariusz Piotrowski; Zofia Przybylska-Baluta; Teresa Jimenez-Marco; Lina Kryzauskaite; Andreas Papachronis; Aliki Marinaki; Paul Höcker; Sigrid Cherrier-de Wilde; Marcia Cardoso
Journal:  Blood Transfus       Date:  2017-03-23       Impact factor: 3.443

3.  Increase of plasma concentration to 10% improves a number of in vitro storage parameters of apheresis platelets suspended in a bicarbonate-containing additive solution and stored with a 24-hour interruption of agitation.

Authors:  Stephen J Wagner; Andrey Skripchenko; Cheryl A Hapip; Nadine Kaelber; Annette Turgeon
Journal:  Blood Transfus       Date:  2017-03-02       Impact factor: 3.443

4.  Transfusion-related adverse reactions reported to the National Healthcare Safety Network Hemovigilance Module, United States, 2010 to 2012.

Authors:  Alexis R Harvey; Sridhar V Basavaraju; Koo-Whang Chung; Matthew J Kuehnert
Journal:  Transfusion       Date:  2014-11-05       Impact factor: 3.157

5.  What Laboratory Tests and Physiologic Triggers Should Guide the Decision to Administer a Platelet or Plasma Transfusion in Critically Ill Children and What Product Attributes Are Optimal to Guide Specific Product Selection? From the Transfusion and Anemia EXpertise Initiative-Control/Avoidance of Bleeding.

Authors:  Meghan Delaney; Oliver Karam; Lani Lieberman; Katherine Steffen; Jennifer A Muszynski; Ruchika Goel; Scot T Bateman; Robert I Parker; Marianne E Nellis; Kenneth E Remy
Journal:  Pediatr Crit Care Med       Date:  2022-01-01       Impact factor: 3.971

6.  Comparison of Quality and Efficacy of Apheresis Platelets Stored in Platelet Additive Solution Vis a Vis Plasma.

Authors:  Debapriya Basu; Sabita Basu; Vivek S Radhakrishnan; Sanjay Bhattacharya; Subhosmito Chakraborty; Subir Sinha; Mammen Chandy
Journal:  Indian J Hematol Blood Transfus       Date:  2021-03-12       Impact factor: 0.915

Review 7.  Platelet Additive Solutions: A Review of the Latest Developments and Their Clinical Implications.

Authors:  Pieter F van der Meer; Dirk de Korte
Journal:  Transfus Med Hemother       Date:  2018-03-09       Impact factor: 3.747

8.  Influence of apheresis collection device and container on the storage properties of platelets in 90% PAS-5/10% plasma.

Authors:  Stephen J Wagner; Cheryl A Hapip; Annette Turgeon; Lenora Abel; Nadine Kaelber
Journal:  Blood Transfus       Date:  2018-09-05       Impact factor: 3.443

9.  Platelet storage lesion: An update.

Authors:  Kshitija Mittal; Ravneet Kaur
Journal:  Asian J Transfus Sci       Date:  2015 Jan-Jun

10.  Supplemental findings of the 2019 National Blood Collection and Utilization Survey.

Authors:  Sanjida J Mowla; Mathew R P Sapiano; Jefferson M Jones; James J Berger; Sridhar V Basavaraju
Journal:  Transfusion       Date:  2021-08-01       Impact factor: 3.337

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.