Literature DB >> 24732567

The time course of top-down control on saccade averaging.

J Heeman1, J Theeuwes2, S Van der Stigchel3.   

Abstract

When objects in a visual scene are positioned in close proximity, eye movements to these objects tend to land at an intermediate location between the objects (i.e., the global effect). This effect is most pronounced for short latency saccades and is therefore believed to be reflexive and dominantly controlled by bottom-up information. At longer latencies this effect can be modulated by top-down factors. The current study established the time course at which top-down information starts to have an influence on bottom-up averaging. In a standard global effect task two peripheral stimuli (a red and a green abrupt onset) were positioned within an angular distance of 20°. In the condition in which observers received no specific target instruction, the eyes landed in between the red and green element establishing the classic global effect. However, when observers were instructed to make a saccade to the red element during a whole block or when the target color varied from trial-to-trial (red or green), a clear effect of the target instruction on the accuracy of the landing position of the primary saccade was found. With increasing saccade latencies, the eyes landed closer to the instructed target. Crucially, however, this effect was even seen for the shortest saccade latencies (as early as 200 ms), suggesting that saccade averaging is affected early on by top-down processes.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Keywords:  Global effect; Inter-trial priming; Saccade averaging; Task demand; Time course; Top-down control

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24732567     DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2014.03.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  10 in total

1.  Automatic and intentional influences on saccade landing.

Authors:  David Aagten-Murphy; Paul M Bays
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-05-24       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  The temporal and spatial constraints of saccade planning to double-step target displacements.

Authors:  Shane Kelly; Weiwei Zhou; Sonia Bansal; Matthew S Peterson; Wilsaan M Joiner
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2019-08-28       Impact factor: 1.886

3.  Oculomotor interference of bimodal distractors.

Authors:  Jessica Heeman; Tanja C W Nijboer; Nathan Van der Stoep; Jan Theeuwes; Stefan Van der Stigchel
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2016-05-19       Impact factor: 1.886

4.  Revisiting the global effect and inhibition of return.

Authors:  Jelmer P De Vries; Stefan Van der Stigchel; Ignace T C Hooge; Frans A J Verstraten
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2016-07-04       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Visual information is required to reduce the global effect.

Authors:  Kiki Arkesteijn; Mieke Donk; Jeroen B J Smeets; Artem V Belopolsky
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2020-07       Impact factor: 2.199

6.  Inhibition of saccade initiation improves saccade accuracy: The role of local and remote visual distractors in the control of saccadic eye movements.

Authors:  Eugene McSorley; Alice G Cruickshank; Rachel McCloy
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2021-03-01       Impact factor: 2.240

7.  Saccadic landing positions reveal that eye movements are affected by distractor-based retrieval.

Authors:  Lars-Michael Schöpper; Markus Lappe; Christian Frings
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2022-08-17       Impact factor: 2.157

8.  Visual attention is not deployed at the endpoint of averaging saccades.

Authors:  Luca Wollenberg; Heiner Deubel; Martin Szinte
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2018-06-25       Impact factor: 8.029

9.  Target-distractor competition cannot be resolved across a saccade.

Authors:  Kiki Arkesteijn; Jeroen B J Smeets; Mieke Donk; Artem V Belopolsky
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-10-24       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Visual attention and eye movement control during oculomotor competition.

Authors:  Luca Wollenberg; Nina M Hanning; Heiner Deubel
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2020-09-02       Impact factor: 2.240

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.