Literature DB >> 24732104

Cytokines associated with necrotizing enterocolitis in extremely-low-birth-weight infants.

Akhil Maheshwari1, Robert L Schelonka2, Reed A Dimmitt3, Waldemar A Carlo3, Breda Munoz-Hernandez4, Abhik Das4, Scott A McDonald4, Poul Thorsen5, Kristin Skogstrand6, David M Hougaard6, Rosemary D Higgins7.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The goal was to identify cytokines associated with necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC). Based on our earlier reports of decreased tissue expression of transforming growth factor (TGF)-β, we hypothesized that infants with NEC also have low blood TGF-β levels. We further hypothesized that because fetal inflammation increases the risk of NEC, infants who develop NEC have elevated blood cytokine levels in early neonatal period.
METHODS: Data on 104 extremely-low-birth-weight infants with NEC and 893 without NEC from 17 centers were analyzed. Clinical information was correlated with blood cytokine levels on postnatal day 1 (D1), D3, D7, D14, and D21.
RESULTS: Male gender, non-Caucasian/non-African American ethnicity, sepsis, lower blood TGF-β and interleukin (IL)-2 levels, and higher IL-8 levels were associated with NEC. The NEC group had lower TGF-β levels than controls since D1. The diagnosis of NEC was associated with elevated IL-1β, IL-6, IL-8, IL-10, monocyte chemoattractant protein-1/CC-motif ligand-2, macrophage inflammatory protein-1β/CC-motif ligand-3, and C-reactive protein.
CONCLUSION: Clinical characteristics, such as gender and ethnicity, and low blood TGF-β levels are associated with higher risk of NEC. Infants who developed NEC did not start with high blood levels of inflammatory cytokines, but these rose mainly after the onset of NEC.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24732104      PMCID: PMC4062583          DOI: 10.1038/pr.2014.48

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pediatr Res        ISSN: 0031-3998            Impact factor:   3.756


INTRODUCTION

Necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) continues to be a leading cause of morbidity and mortality in premature infants (1). Although the etiology of NEC is unclear, current evidence associates NEC with diverse pre- and postnatal factors such as placental insufficiency, chorioamnionitis, gut ischemia, altered bacterial colonization, viruses, and blood transfusions. These conditions presumably disrupt the mucosal barrier and promote translocation of luminal bacteria, which trigger an inflammatory reaction in the developing intestine (2). Several cross-sectional studies show that NEC is associated with increased expression of inflammatory cytokines such as tumor necrosis factor (TNF), interleukin (IL)-1β, IL-6, and IL-8/CXC-motif ligand 8 (CXCL8) in both plasma and affected tissues (3–7). These cytokines are potential therapeutic targets in NEC because (a) preclinical evidence indicates that these cytokines can disrupt the epithelial barrier and augment intestinal injury (8); and (b) monoclonal antibodies and/or small molecule inhibitors are now available that can block the effect of these inflammatory mediators. At the same time, concerns remain about possible harm from anti-cytokine therapy in preterm infants because many so-called ‘inflammatory’ cytokines play important developmental roles in the gut mucosa and mucosa-associated immune system (5,9). Evidence from cross-sectional studies has its limitations because cytokine expression changes during normal gestational maturation and with co-morbidities associated with prematurity (10). To elucidate the pathophysiological role of cytokines in NEC, there is a need for longitudinal comparison of cytokine concentrations before and after onset of NEC and in infants who eventually developed NEC vs. others who did not. Towards this goal, we performed a secondary analysis of data obtained as part of the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD) Neonatal Research Network Cytokine Study, a prospective multi-center study in which extremely-low-birth-weight (ELBW) infants were enrolled and clinical information and serial cytokine measurements were collected from birth through postnatal day 21 (11). We have shown recently that premature infants may be at risk of NEC due to a developmental deficiency of TGF-β in the intestine, which is further accentuated during NEC (12). In the present study, we hypothesized that decreased tissue expression of TGF-β is a systemic phenomenon reflected in blood samples from patients who develop NEC. In addition, in view of the epidemiological association of NEC with fetal inflammation related to chorioamnionitis, prolonged rupture of membranes, and Ureaplasma infections (13,14), we hypothesized that infants who develop NEC have elevated serum cytokine levels in early neonatal period and prior to the onset of NEC.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We conducted a secondary analysis of clinical and biological data collected as part of the NICHD Cytokine Study (11). Preterm neonates with birth weight 401–1000 g were enrolled after obtaining written informed consent from the parent(s). Whole blood spots were collected on standardized filter paper and frozen on postnatal days 0–1 (D1), 3±1 (D3), 7±1 (D7), 14±3 (D14), and 21±3 (D21) using an established protocol that has been shown to maintain sample quality and consistency for cytokine measurements over extended periods of time (>20 years) (15). Clinical data were collected by trained research coordinators and analyzed at a central data coordinating center. Concentrations of 25 cytokines/inflammatory mediators were measured in blood spot eluates using a multiplex flow cytometric immunoassay based on laser detection of color-encoded antibody-tagged microspheres (xMAP assay, Luminex Corp., Austin, TX) (15). The following analytes were included in the immunoassay panel: IL-1β, IL-2, IL-4, IL-5, IL-6, IL-12, IL-17, IL-18, TNF, lymphotoxin-alpha (LT-α)/TNF-beta, interferon (IFN)-γ, granulocyte macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF), monocyte chemoattractant protein (MCP)-1/CC ligand (CCL)-2, macrophage inflammatory protein (MIP)-1α/CCL3, MIP-1β/CCL4, regulated on activation, normal T-cell expressed and secreted (RANTES)/CCL5, IL-8/CXCL8, IL-10, TGF-β1, matrix metalloproteinase (MMP)-9, soluble IL-6 receptor (sIL6R), triggering receptor expressed on myeloid cells (TREM)-1, brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF), neurotrophin-4, and C-reactive protein (CRP). This assay has low intra- (<10%) and inter-assay (7–23%) variation and has lower limits of detection lower than reported median plasma concentrations of these cytokines/inflammatory factors in normal neonates. The ‘NEC group’ was comprised of all preterm neonates enrolled in the NICHD cytokine study with a diagnosis of NEC (Bell’s stages II and III) (16). All other infants were included in the control group. Demographic and clinical data, including gestational age, birth weight, gender, ethnicity, history of sepsis, postnatal age when feeds were started, age when full enteral feeds were achieved, and age at onset of NEC were obtained from the NRN generic database. Frequencies (percentage), means, standard deviations, median values, and ranges were computed for demographic data and cytokine concentrations. Frequencies were compared by the Fisher’s exact test. We compared (a) peak cytokine concentrations in NEC vs. control groups; (b) cytokine concentrations in NEC group prior to onset of NEC vs. controls; and (c) samples drawn from the NEC group ‘before NEC’ vs. ‘after NEC’ group, using the Student’s t test or when the variance in the two groups was unequal, the Welch-Satterthwaite t-test. To identify clinical characteristics and cytokines associated with NEC, we performed a stepwise logistic regression analysis. Univariate logistic regression models were first used to evaluate the association between NEC and categorical predictors such as gender (1 = male, 2 = female), ethnicity (1 = African-American, 2 = Caucasian, 3 = other), and sepsis (1 = yes, 0 = no), and then with continuous predictors (gestational age, birth weight and cytokines). Variables identified in the univariate analysis at p<0.20 (and some other covariates that were not significant but were biologically-plausible, such as gender) were then used to develop a multivariate survival model. Cytokines were considered time-dependent and right-censored (because many infants developed NEC after the end of the study period) covariates. For categorical predictors, we examined Kaplan-Meier curves and then used the log-rank test for equality across strata to identify predictors (p<0.25) to be included in the final model. For continuous variables, a univariate Cox proportional hazard regression model was used to identify predictors to be included in the multivariate analysis. To determine the diagnostic usefulness of blood TGF-β levels, we computed receiver operating characteristics (ROCs) and selected a TGF-β concentration with the highest sum of sensitivity and specificity for further evaluation as a diagnostic ‘cut-off’ value. The accuracy of this cut-off value in correctly classifying infants into the NEC and control groups was computed using a 2 × 2 confusion matrix of the predicted and observed number of cases. To determine whether the diagnostic accuracy of TGF-β could be improved by adding other cytokines or clinical characteristics to the ROC model, we performed logistic regression and identified covariates associated with NEC at p<0.20. These covariates were then evaluated using inclusive (with all variables) and reduced models.

RESULTS

Patient characteristics

A total of 1067 infants with birth weights between 410–1000 grams were admitted to the participating centers during the study period and were enrolled in the study within 72 hours. In the final analysis, 997 infants were included; 70 neonates were excluded due to death in the first 7 days (n = 43), birth defects (n = 13), or early-onset sepsis (n = 14). NEC was recorded in 104/997 (10.4%) infants at a median age of 23.5 days (range 1–114 days). The distribution of gestational age, birth weight, and gender was similar in NEC and control groups (Table 1). The NEC group had a higher percentage of African-American infants (61/104, 58.6% in the NEC group vs. 423/997, 47.4% controls, p = 0.02) and also had a higher incidence of sepsis (52.9 vs. 41.6%, p = 0.02).
Table 1

Demographic and clinical information

Variable NameNEC groupControls1

Total cases104893
Birth weight (mean ± SD)750.2 ± 137.4766.9 ± 140.3
Gestational age (weeks) (mean ± SD)25.93 ± 1.925.64 ± 1.6
Gender (% male)52.947.4
Ethnicity
 African American (%)58.6*47.4*
 White (%)24.031.7
 Others (%)17.320.9
Tocolytics48.541.2
Antenatal steroids (%)83.676.4
Postnatal steroids (%)28.825.9
Ventilator days (mean ± SD)28.5 ± 25.324.3 ± 25.0
Days on oxygen (mean ± SD)57.4 ± 39.857.7 ± 38.2
Sepsis (%)52.9*41.6*

Total number of controls with complete information varies by variable.

Statistical significant differences at 5% level.

Longitudinal changes in blood cytokines

All cytokines showed significant time trends (p<0.05) during the first 3 postnatal weeks. IL-1β, IL-2, IL-4, IL-5, IL-6, IL-10, IL-12, IL-17, LT-α, GM-CSF, and NT-4 showed a decreasing trend over time, whereas IL-18, BDNF, MIP-1β/CCL4, MMP-9, RANTES/CCL5, TGF-β1, and CRP increased with postnatal age. Infants in the NEC group had lower TGF-β levels over the study period than controls (median 1871, range 467–11431 pg/mL vs. 2501, range 202–12750 pg/mL, p<0.05). There was also a trend towards lower IL-2 concentrations in the NEC group (median 58, range 3–430 pg/mL vs. 70, range 3–3118 pg/mL, p=0.07). In contrast, IL-8/CXCL8 levels were higher in the NEC group than controls (median 4527, range 297–837973 pg/mL vs. 4069, range 130–674431 pg/mL, p<0.05). These data are summarized in Table 2.
Table 2

Summary statistics for peak cytokine concentrations in cases and controls

CytokineCases
NMinMedianMeanMax

IL-1β104151733662560
IL-210435873430
IL-410417152186934
IL-5104111541991405
IL-6104111806442916
IL-1210431432142560
IL-17104322043371910
IL-18104379223626068778
TNF1041476115598
LT-α10483494892939
IFN-γ10432412831106
GM-CSF10461451851943
MCP-1/CCL2104273972442118876
MIP-1α/CCL310453257120938308
MIP-1β/CCL41044551435190411196
RANTES/CCL51045920134980168124672487
IL-8/CXCL8104297452727797837973
IL-101041866019059854
TGF-β11044671871225811431
MMP-910433082222792515316557156598823
sIL-6R1045570082381457713001399240278
TREM-11044593396404815318
BDNF104124965741029680448
CRP10479283133908819620319465221
NT41041095114348

Peak calculated as the Maximum Cytokine for each infant.

For Cases: Peak calculated using all sample days

For Controls: Peak calculated using all sample days

Testing the average values, test is a two sample t-test

Clinical characteristics and cytokines associated with NEC

In univariate logistic regression, the following variables were associated with NEC: gender, ethnicity, sepsis, birth weight, IL-2, IL-17, LT-α, MIP-1α/CCL3, RANTES/CCL5, IL-8/CXCL8, TGF-β1, and BDNF. Each of these variables was included in a time-dependent multivariate survival model. After controlling for other covariates, gender, ethnicity, sepsis, IL-2, IL-8/CXCL8, and TGF-β1 remained significant. A reduced model containing these 6 variables was fitted to the data (Table 3). In the case of ethnicity, African-American was the reference cell, and infants of non-Caucasian, non-African-American ethnicity were at the highest risk (hazard ratio = 2.6× African-American infants) of NEC. Sepsis increased the risk of NEC by 46%. Female gender and Caucasian race were protective, associated with a 23% and 35% lower risk, respectively. For every unit increase in TGF-β1 and IL-2 concentration, the risk of NEC decreased by 0.1%.
Table 3

Estimated multiplicative effect (SE) and test-statistics for H0: beta=0 for Multivariate Model

VariableCoefficientExponentiated coefficient (SE)Wald Test (p-value)
Gender−0.254520.77529 (0.09689)−2.627 (0.009)
Ethnicity (Caucasian)−0.432010.64921 (0.10164)−4.250 (<0.001)
Ethnicity (Other)0.958662.60820 (0.24519)3.909 (<0.001)
Sepsis0.381611.46464 (0.09697)3.935 (<0.001)
IL-2−0.004440.99557 (0.00116)−3.815 (<0.001)
IL-8/CXCL80.0000031.00000 (0.000001)3.065 (0.002)
TGF-β1−0.000190.99981 (0.00005)−4.141 (<0.001)

Log-likelihood=−2806.555

Blood cytokines prior to onset of NEC

To determine whether infants in the NEC group showed a unique cytokine signature even before they developed NEC, we compared samples from the NEC group drawn prior to onset of NEC vs. controls (Figure 1). The NEC group showed lower TGF-β levels than controls at all time-points (D1: median 1090, range 50–7305 pg/mL vs. 1301, 56–7380 pg/mL in controls; D3: 988, 50–6869 vs. 1286, 0–7095 pg/mL in controls; D7: 1073, 50–5364 vs. 1487, 9–6978 pg/mL in controls; D14: 1573, 50–5677 vs. 1952, 50–10022 pg/mL in controls; D21: 1701, 98–11431 vs. 2129, 50–12750 pg/mL in controls; p<0.05 for all sub-groups). The NEC group also had lower IL-18, MIP-1α/CCL3, RANTES/CCL5, and MMP-9 on D3, lower MIP-1α/CCL3, and RANTES/CCL5 on D7, and lower IL-17 levels on D21 (Table 4).
Figure 1

Differential expression of cytokines in blood spots from infants in the NEC (drawn before the onset of NEC; broken lines) and control groups (solid lines). Line diagrams depict median cytokine values on day 1 (D1), D3, D7, D14, and D21, not adjusted for other cytokines or clinical variables: (A) TGF-β1, (B) IL-1β, (C) IL-2, (D) IL-4, (E) IL-5, (F) IL-6, (G) IL-10, (H) IL-12, (I) IL-17, (J) IL-18, (K) TNF, (L) LT-α, (M) IFN-γ, (N) GM-CSF, (O) MCP-1/CCL2, (P) MIP-1α/CCL3, (Q) MIP-1β/CCL4, (R) RANTES/CCL5, (S) IL-8/CXCL8, (T) NT-4, (U) MMP-9, (V) sIL-6R, (W) TREM-1, (X) BDNF, (Y) CRP. * indicates p<0.05

Table 4

Summary statistics for cytokine concentrations in cases prior to NEC vs. controls summarized by day of measurement

CytokineCases before onset of NEC
Controls
p-value
NMinMedianMeanMaxnMinMedianMeanMax

Postnatal Day 1

BDNF613422741365826312470206343844531030330.04
TGF-β6150109012727305470561301158673800.02

Postnatal Day 3

IL-189024710661503601683761255154970770.02
MIP-1α/CCL3906124705199458376154677505340.02
MMP-9902114975135518271733706723883721096108780122944861853091040.01
RANTES/CCL59021596312774585417270837159075081946666786680.03
TGF-β90509881205686983601286154070950.03

Postnatal Day 7

MIP-1α/CCL3866120762167397476141659357070.02
RANTES/CCL586441169165805314170527476668458910940613036090.01
TGF-β865010731376536474891487169769780.01

Postnatal Day 14

IL-26832536155808337546160.01
IL-46837810469380519713425600.04
TGF-β68501573185556778085019522259100220.04

Postnatal Day 21

IL-25232435171748238545600.04
IL-17523107163737748115322923300.04
BDNF524255309980880448749247176104682396350.05
NT-45233741196748043534030.04
TGF-β529817012064114317495021292463127500.05

Association of TGF-β with NEC

To determine whether blood TGF-β levels could discriminate between the NEC vs. control groups, we computed ROCs of TGF-β using data from all the cases before they developed NEC and controls (Figure 2). The area under the curve (AUC) was 0.67, indicating “fair” diagnostic accuracy. Inclusion of other clinical variables or cytokines did not improve the accuracy of this model. A ‘cut-off’ TGF-β = 1380 pg/mL (at the best sensitivity and specificity coordinates) classified infants into the NEC or control group with 64.0% accuracy (95% confidence interval 60.9% – 66.9%; Table 5). The sensitivity and specificity were 68% and 46% on D1 and D3, 64% and 56% on D7, and 40% and 74.4%, respectively, on D14 and D21. The AUC improved to 0.71 when ROCs were computed using cumulative TGF-β values.
Figure 2

Receiver-operator characteristics (ROC) of TGF-β in blood spots from infants in the NEC (drawn before the onset of NEC) and control groups. Red markers on the curve indicate TGF-β concentrations. A cut-off TGF-β level of 1380 pg/mL (marked by broken lines in the figure) correctly classified 61.2% infants in the NEC group (true positives) but gave a false-positive result in 35.7% controls.

Table 5

Diagnostic value of TGF-β1 <1380 pg/mL as a predictive marker for NEC

95% Confidence Interval
Lower LimitUpper Limit
Prevalence0.10.090.12
Sensitivity0.610.510.7
Specificity0.640.610.67
For any particular test result, the probability that it will be:
Positive0.380.350.41
Negative0.620.590.65
For any particular positive test result, the probability that it is:
True Positive0.160.130.21
False Positive0.840.790.87
For any particular negative test result, the probability that it is:
True Negative0.930.910.95
False Negative0.070.050.09
Likelihood Ratios:
Positive1.711.432.04
Negative0.60.470.77
To confirm that low TGF-β levels in infants who went on to develop NEC were not an artifact arising from exclusion of samples from later time-points, we compared TGF-β levels in the NEC vs. control groups as a function of post-menstrual age (PMA). NEC group had lower TGF-β levels at PMAs of 25 weeks (median 897, range 50–7305 pg/mL vs. 1382, range 50–7023 pg/mL in controls; p=0.02) and 27 weeks (median 1073, range 50–5677 pg/mL vs. 1646, range 9–9484 pg/mL; p<0.0001), and showed a trend towards lower levels at PMA 26 and 28–29 weeks. The number of samples at other PMAs was not adequate for analysis. TGF-β levels showed a small but significant negative correlation with the postnatal age at first enteral feed (Pearson’s r = −0.09 in complete data set, p = 0.007) and when full enteral feeds were achieved (r = −0.11, p = 0.001). TGF-β levels also correlated negatively with death before discharge (r = −0.14, p <0.0001).

Changes in cytokine concentrations after the onset of NEC

To identify cytokine biomarkers of NEC, we compared samples drawn from the NEC group before vs. after the onset of NEC. Summary statistics for cytokines that showed significant differences on D7, D14, and D21 are depicted in Table 6. There was a trend towards lower TGF-β levels in samples drawn after NEC but the difference did not reach statistical significance.
Table 6

Cytokine concentrations in the NEC group before and after onset of NEC

Samples drawn from infants who were yet to develop NEC
Samples drawn from infants who had already developed NEC
p-value
CytokineNMinMedianMeanMaxnMinMedianMeanMax

Postnatal Day 7

CRP86200042766471922447113905731302449122251811650000000.04

Postnatal Day 14

IL-1β6838917686023313233425600.05
IL-668368163256023314270529160.00
MCP-1/CCL2682117612698156392324236684478188760.02
MIP-1β/CCL4686978124257492346011652137111960.02
IL-8/CXCL86820618725183102627237868233261072805050.01
IL-10683316353997233339784450220.00

Postnatal Day 21

IL-6523549978830311045825600.00
IL-175231071637373031972739290.02
CRP5214600836001107067639634973020001414326171596771772010.03

DISCUSSION

We identified male gender, non-Caucasian/non-African-American ethnicity, history of sepsis, lower blood TGF-β1 and IL-2 levels, and higher IL-8/CXCL8 levels to be associated with NEC in ELBW infants. Although infants who went on to develop NEC showed important differences in blood cytokine levels compared to controls starting on the day of birth, it was the clinical parameters, and not cytokines, that accounted for most of the risk of NEC in our statistical models. These findings are consistent with earlier observations in bronchopulmonary dysplasia (17), indicating that clinical variables may be driving the association of these cytokines with NEC, rather than vice versa. Our observations of increased risk of NEC in male infants and in certain ethnic groups are consistent with previous reports (18,19). The risk of NEC in non-Caucasian/non-African-American infants is consistent with the recent data showing higher NEC-related morbidity in Latinos (19), but not with earlier studies that identified African-American neonates to be at the highest risk (18,19). Although some of these disparities could be due to differences in access to prenatal care, specific genetic factors may also be at play. In our study, ELBW infants who went on to develop NEC started with low circulating TGF-β1 since D1. Blood TGF-β1 concentrations <1380 pg/mL predicted NEC with 64% accuracy. Although several biomarkers (such as the inter-alpha inhibitor protein, intestinal fatty acid-binding protein, hexosaminidase, proapolipoprotein CII, and des-arginine serum amyloid A) have been identified for their ability to discriminate between confirmed NEC and other causes of feeding intolerance (20–23), blood TGF-β1 is the first biomarker to estimate the risk of NEC in a newly-born premature infant. Despite moderate diagnostic accuracy, the ability of blood TGF-β1 to identify at-risk infants several weeks before the actual development of NEC has the potential to change clinical practice, allowing targeted application of splanchnic perfusion/oxygenation monitors, devices that are potentially-useful but are expensive or cumbersome for universal use in neonatal intensive care units, or the use of banked human milk and probiotics, interventions that are promising but of unproven safety in ELBW infants (24,25). Although a predictive accuracy of 64% may appear modest, it may be a major advance in our ability to estimate the risk of NEC in a premature infant on the 1st postnatal day – a rise from our current accuracy levels of 5–15% based on data on incidence of NEC by gestational age. The NPV of 93% is similarly modest (in a cohort with 10% incidence of NEC, a randomly-chosen sample should show an NPV of 90%) but may be clinically important; most premature infants with abdominal signs are currently treated presumptively for NEC even when they do not have NEC, and in this context, even a small improvement in risk-stratification may be useful. Our findings of low blood TGF-β levels in the NEC group are consistent with our previous reports where we showed that preterm neonates may be at risk of inflammatory mucosal injury and NEC because of a developmental deficiency of TGF-β isoforms TGF-β1 and TGF-β2 in the intestine (12,26). We demonstrated that TGF-β normally suppresses the inflammatory responses of resident intestinal macrophages, thereby promoting mucosal tolerance to bacterial products (12). However, in the TGF-β-deficient preterm intestine, macrophages produce an exaggerated cytokine response upon exposure to bacterial products (12). In addition to its effects on macrophages, TGF-β also restricts the Th1 and Th2 gut lymphocyte pools by suppressing T-cell trafficking, increasing apoptosis in activated T-cells, and promoting the development of regulatory T cells (27). The anti-inflammatory effects of TGF-β are evident in TGF-β1-deficient mice, which develop mucosal and systemic inflammation within a few weeks after birth (28). Circulating TGF-β originates from diverse cellular sources including platelets, monocytes/macrophages, lymphocytes, epithelium, and mesenchymal cells (27), and is comprised mostly of latent TGF-β bound to α2-macroglobulin along with a small pool of free, active TGF-β that is rapidly taken up and degraded in peripheral tissues. In infants who developed NEC, there are 3 possible explanations for the low circulating TGF-β levels. The first is increased peripheral uptake of TGF-β to compensate for low tissue expression. Peripheral consumption of TGF-β has been described in patients with Guillain-Barré syndrome, who have low plasma TGF-β levels despite evidence of increased production (29). Consistent with this hypothesis, we have previously shown that TGF-β expression is decreased in healthy margins of tissues resected for NEC (12). A second explanation for low circulating TGF-β levels is based on an assumption that the developing intestine is a major contributor to circulating TGF-β levels. Because TGF-β expression increases in the intestine as a function of gestational maturation, lower tissue expression of TGF-β in infants who developed NEC could conceivably reflect an underlying state of arrested mucosal development, where low TGF-β expression may indicate persistence of a cytokine profile corresponding to an earlier, less mature developmental epoch (30,31). In support of this possibility, we detected lower TGF-β levels in NEC group than in controls at the same post-menstrual age. Finally, infants who developed NEC may constitutively produce less TGF-β than controls due to genetic/epigenetic factors. Polymorphisms in the TGF-β1 gene such as G915C, C-509T, and T869C are common in the general population and are associated with higher blood TGF-β levels (32), although the significance of these genetic markers is unclear in NEC. We have recently shown that NEC is associated with dimethylation of the lysine 9 residue of histone 3 in the TGF-β nucleosome, a repressive modification associated with facultative heterochromatin assembly and transcriptional silencing (26). Further study is needed to determine the timing of these epigenetic changes in at-risk infants. We did not find support for our second hypothesis as we did not detect elevated cytokine levels at early time-points in the NEC group. Prior to the development of NEC, infants in the NEC group had significantly low IL-18, MIP-1β/CCL4, and RANTES/CCL5, and a tendency for most other cytokines to be lower than controls. Interestingly, NEC is marked by a paucity of T-cells, which are a major cellular source of many of these cytokines (33–35). We also detected low IL-2 levels in our NEC patients on D14 and D21. IL-2 is a Th1-derived cytokine that promotes proliferation and activation of CD4+ and CD8+ lymphocytes, and an IL-2-deficient state may result in limited T-cell lifespan and proliferation. However, low levels of IL-6 and CRP, which are mainly produced in the liver, indicate that these defects may extend beyond the intestine (36). The diagnosis of NEC was associated with increased expression of IL-6, IL-8/CXCL8, IL-10, IL-18, MCP-1/CCL2, MIP-1β/CCL3, CRP, and NT-4. Elevated IL-8/CXCL8, IL-6, and IL-18 levels have noted previously during NEC (3–6,37) and are adversely associated with disease severity and with short-term survival in NEC (4,38). IL-6 has a shorter half-life and may be detectable only for short periods after onset of NEC (39), whereas IL-8/CXCL8 levels may show sustained elevation and correlate with the severity of illness over a period of time (5). Increased IL-6 and CRP in NEC support the presence of a gut-liver inflammatory axis, where the transfer of bacterial products and inflammatory mediators into the portal circulation amplifies the production of cytokines and nitric oxide in the liver. These mediators then exacerbate intestinal injury via enterohepatic circulation, setting up a feed-forward loop of inflammation (40). The major strengths of our study are a large sample of ELBW infants recruited from multiple sites, prospective data collection by trained observers, and measurement of multiple cytokines at serial time-points, including well before the onset of NEC. An important limitation is its exclusive reliance on circulating levels of cytokines, which does not identify the cellular sources or the effector cells that are likely to respond to these cytokines. We were also limited by exclusion of infants with early-onset sepsis (n=16), who would have comprised an important comparison group. We were unable to evaluate the effects of human milk vs. formula feeding, gut microbiota, and chorioamnionitis, each of which may alter or reprogram infant cytokine profiles, due to limitations of the retrospective study design. Finally, the NICHD Cytokine Study was designed to investigate cytokine predictors of neurodevelopmental impairment, and therefore, the cytokine panel was comprised of analytes generally associated with systemic inflammation and not specifically with gut mucosal injury. This panel included TGF-β1 but not TGF-β2, and further study is needed to determine the relationship of blood TGF-β2 levels with NEC. It may also be possible to improve the predictive accuracy of blood TGF-β levels by combining these data with other clinical predictors of NEC (2) such as absence/reversal of umbilical blood flow on prenatal Doppler examination or histopathological evidence of chorioamnionitis.

CONCLUSIONS

Male gender, non-Caucasian/non-African-American ethnicity, sepsis, lower blood TGF-β and interleukin (IL)-2 levels, and higher IL-8 levels were associated with NEC. Blood TGF-β concentrations <1380 pg/mL predicted NEC with about 64% accuracy on the day of birth. We did not find support for our second hypothesis that infants who develop NEC have higher cytokine levels in early neonatal period.
  40 in total

1.  Inflammation in the developing human intestine: A possible pathophysiologic contribution to necrotizing enterocolitis.

Authors:  N N Nanthakumar; R D Fusunyan; I Sanderson; W A Walker
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2000-05-23       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Plasma intestinal fatty acid binding protein in neonates with necrotizing enterocolitis: a pilot study.

Authors:  M B Edelson; R E Sonnino; C E Bagwell; J M Lieberman; W H Marks; H J Rozycki
Journal:  J Pediatr Surg       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 2.545

Review 3.  Transforming growth factor-beta: innately bipolar.

Authors:  Sharon M Wahl
Journal:  Curr Opin Immunol       Date:  2006-11-28       Impact factor: 7.486

4.  Neonatal gut barrier and multiple organ failure: role of endotoxin and proinflammatory cytokines in sepsis and necrotizing enterocolitis.

Authors:  Renu Sharma; Joseph J Tepas; Mark L Hudak; Daniel L Mollitt; Peter S Wludyka; Ru-Jeng Teng; Bangalore R Premachandra
Journal:  J Pediatr Surg       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 2.545

Review 5.  Necrotizing enterocolitis of the newborn: pathogenetic concepts in perspective.

Authors:  W Hsueh; M S Caplan; X Tan; W MacKendrick; F Gonzalez-Crussi
Journal:  Pediatr Dev Pathol       Date:  1998 Jan-Feb

6.  Matrix metalloproteinases in necrotising enterocolitis.

Authors:  Sylvia Lin Foon Pender; Christian Braegger; Ute Gunther; Giovanni Monteleone; Martin Meuli; Detlef Schuppan; Thomas Thornton Macdonald
Journal:  Pediatr Res       Date:  2003-05-07       Impact factor: 3.756

7.  Smad7 inhibits autocrine expression of TGF-β2 in intestinal epithelial cells in baboon necrotizing enterocolitis.

Authors:  Kopperuncholan Namachivayam; Cynthia L Blanco; Krishnan MohanKumar; Ramasamy Jagadeeswaran; Margarita Vasquez; Lisa McGill-Vargas; Steven A Garzon; Sunil K Jain; Ravinder K Gill; Nancy E Freitag; Jörn-Hendrik Weitkamp; Steven R Seidner; Akhil Maheshwari
Journal:  Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol       Date:  2012-11-15       Impact factor: 4.052

Review 8.  Formula milk versus donor breast milk for feeding preterm or low birth weight infants.

Authors:  M A Quigley; G Henderson; M Y Anthony; W McGuire
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2007-10-17

9.  Cytokine elevations in critically ill infants with sepsis and necrotizing enterocolitis.

Authors:  M C Harris; A T Costarino; J S Sullivan; S Dulkerian; L McCawley; L Corcoran; S Butler; L Kilpatrick
Journal:  J Pediatr       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 4.406

10.  Comprehensive evaluation of 11 cytokines in premature infants with surgical necrotizing enterocolitis.

Authors:  Thomas Benkoe; Suzann Baumann; Manfred Weninger; Mario Pones; Carlos Reck; Winfried Rebhandl; Rudolf Oehler
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-03-05       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  44 in total

1.  Enteric serotonin and oxytocin: endogenous regulation of severity in a murine model of necrotizing enterocolitis.

Authors:  Kara Gross Margolis; Jennifer Vittorio; Maria Talavera; Karen Gluck; Zhishan Li; Alina Iuga; Korey Stevanovic; Virginia Saurman; Narek Israelyan; Martha G Welch; Michael D Gershon
Journal:  Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol       Date:  2017-08-03       Impact factor: 4.052

2.  Early Persistent Blood Eosinophilia in Necrotizing Enterocolitis Is a Predictor of Late Complications.

Authors:  Lila S Wahidi; Jan Sherman; Mindy M Miller; Habib Zaghouani; Michael P Sherman
Journal:  Neonatology       Date:  2015-07-07       Impact factor: 4.035

Review 3.  The Microbiome and Biomarkers for Necrotizing Enterocolitis: Are We Any Closer to Prediction?

Authors:  Brigida Rusconi; Misty Good; Barbara B Warner
Journal:  J Pediatr       Date:  2017-06-29       Impact factor: 4.406

4.  Anemia induces gut inflammation and injury in an animal model of preterm infants.

Authors:  Connie M Arthur; Demet Nalbant; Henry A Feldman; Bejan J Saeedi; Jason Matthews; Brian S Robinson; Nourine A Kamili; Ashley Bennett; Gretchen A Cress; Martha Sola-Visner; Rheinallt M Jones; M Bridget Zimmerman; Andrew S Neish; Ravi M Patel; Peggy Nopoulos; Michael K Georgieff; John D Roback; John A Widness; Cassandra D Josephson; Sean R Stowell
Journal:  Transfusion       Date:  2019-03-21       Impact factor: 3.157

5.  Antenatal glucocorticoids and neonatal inflammation-associated proteins.

Authors:  Maheer Faden; Mari Holm; Elizabeth Allred; Raina Fichorova; Olaf Dammann; Alan Leviton
Journal:  Cytokine       Date:  2016-09-24       Impact factor: 3.861

Review 6.  An Integrative Review of Cytokine/Chemokine Predictors of Neurodevelopment in Preterm Infants.

Authors:  Marliese Dion Nist; Rita H Pickler
Journal:  Biol Res Nurs       Date:  2019-05-29       Impact factor: 2.522

Review 7.  Necrotizing enterocolitis: new insights into pathogenesis and mechanisms.

Authors:  Diego F Niño; Chhinder P Sodhi; David J Hackam
Journal:  Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2016-08-18       Impact factor: 46.802

Review 8.  Pathogenesis of necrotizing enterocolitis: modeling the innate immune response.

Authors:  Scott M Tanner; Taylor F Berryhill; James L Ellenburg; Tamas Jilling; Dava S Cleveland; Robin G Lorenz; Colin A Martin
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  2014-11-04       Impact factor: 4.307

Review 9.  Immunologic and Hematological Abnormalities in Necrotizing Enterocolitis.

Authors:  Akhil Maheshwari
Journal:  Clin Perinatol       Date:  2015-05-13       Impact factor: 3.430

Review 10.  Enteral Feeding Interventions in the Prevention of Necrotizing Enterocolitis: A Systematic Review of Experimental and Clinical Studies.

Authors:  Ilse H de Lange; Charlotte van Gorp; Laurens D Eeftinck Schattenkerk; Wim G van Gemert; Joep P M Derikx; Tim G A M Wolfs
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2021-05-19       Impact factor: 5.717

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.