Literature DB >> 24731064

Treatment of adult Class II division 2 patient with metal hypersensitivity.

Seiji Haraguchi1, Takashi Yamashiro.   

Abstract

This case report describes the orthodontic treatment of an adult female with an Angle Class II division 2 malocclusion with a severe deep bite and a congenitally missing lower incisor. The use of available orthodontic devices and materials was limited because the patient had metal allergies. Following a careful examination and case analysis, the preadjusted edgewise appliances and the microscrew implants were placed after the upper first premolars were extracted. After active treatment, a good facial profile and occlusion were achieved. These results have been maintained for 2 years following completion of the active treatment.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Deep bite; Metal allergy; Temporary anchorage devices

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24731064      PMCID: PMC8641279          DOI: 10.2319/100613-736.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Angle Orthod        ISSN: 0003-3219            Impact factor:   2.079


  8 in total

Review 1.  Hypersensitivity reactions to metallic implants - diagnostic algorithm and suggested patch test series for clinical use.

Authors:  Peter C Schalock; Torkil Menné; Jeanne D Johansen; James S Taylor; Howard I Maibach; Carola Lidén; Magnus Bruze; Jacob P Thyssen
Journal:  Contact Dermatitis       Date:  2011-09-29       Impact factor: 6.600

2.  Correction of deep overbite and gummy smile by using a mini-implant with a segmented wire in a growing Class II Division 2 patient.

Authors:  Tae-Woo Kim; Hyewon Kim; Shin-Jae Lee
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 2.650

3.  Suspected association of an allergic reaction with titanium dental implants: a clinical report.

Authors:  Hiroshi Egusa; Nagakazu Ko; Tsunetoshi Shimazu; Hirofumi Yatani
Journal:  J Prosthet Dent       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 3.426

4.  Surgical versus orthodontic correction of skeletal Class II malocclusion in adolescents: effects and indications.

Authors:  W R Proffit; C Phillips; J F Tulloch; P H Medland
Journal:  Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg       Date:  1992

5.  Immune response to synthetic materials. Sensitization of patients receiving orthopaedic implants.

Authors:  K Merritt; J J Rodrigo
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  Titanium allergy in dental implant patients: a clinical study on 1500 consecutive patients.

Authors:  Alberto Sicilia; Susana Cuesta; Gerardo Coma; Ignacio Arregui; Cristina Guisasola; Eduardo Ruiz; Antonio Maestro
Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 5.977

7.  Nickel sensitivity in the general population.

Authors:  L Peltonen
Journal:  Contact Dermatitis       Date:  1979-01       Impact factor: 6.600

Review 8.  Is titanium sensitivity associated with allergic reactions in patients with dental implants? A systematic review.

Authors:  Fawad Javed; Khalid Al-Hezaimi; Khalid Almas; George E Romanos
Journal:  Clin Implant Dent Relat Res       Date:  2011-03-17       Impact factor: 4.259

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.