Literature DB >> 24730735

Stable individual differences in saccadic eye movements during reading, pseudoreading, scene viewing, and scene search.

John M Henderson1, Steven G Luke1.   

Abstract

Mean fixation duration and mean saccade amplitude during active viewing tasks differ from person to person. Previous studies have shown that these individual differences tend to be stable across at least some tasks, suggesting that they may reflect underlying traits associated with individuals. However, whether these individual differences are also stable over time has not been established. The present study established stable individual differences in mean fixation duration and mean saccade amplitude across 4 viewing tasks, showed that the observed individual differences are stable over several days, and extended these results to standard deviations of fixation duration and saccade amplitude. The results have implications for theories of eye movement control and for using eye movement characteristics as individual difference measures.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24730735     DOI: 10.1037/a0036330

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform        ISSN: 0096-1523            Impact factor:   3.332


  19 in total

1.  A novel perceptual trait: gaze predilection for faces during visual exploration.

Authors:  Nitzan Guy; Hagar Azulay; Rasha Kardosh; Yarden Weiss; Ran R Hassin; Salomon Israel; Yoni Pertzov
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-07-24       Impact factor: 4.379

2.  The spatial distribution of attention predicts familiarity strength during encoding and retrieval.

Authors:  Michelle M Ramey; John M Henderson; Andrew P Yonelinas
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2020-04-06

3.  Contributions of reader- and text-level characteristics to eye-movement patterns during passage reading.

Authors:  Victor Kuperman; Kazunaga Matsuki; Julie A Van Dyke
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2018-07-19       Impact factor: 3.051

4.  Effective scheduling of looking and talking during rapid automatized naming.

Authors:  Peter C Gordon; Renske S Hoedemaker
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2015-12-21       Impact factor: 3.332

5.  An Association between Auditory-Visual Synchrony Processing and Reading Comprehension: Behavioral and Electrophysiological Evidence.

Authors:  Julia Mossbridge; Jacob Zweig; Marcia Grabowecky; Satoru Suzuki
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2016-10-19       Impact factor: 3.225

6.  Predicting eye-movement characteristics across multiple tasks from working memory and executive control.

Authors:  Steven G Luke; Emily S Darowski; Shawn D Gale
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2018-07

7.  Toward Semantics in the Wild: Activation to Manipulable Nouns in Naturalistic Reading.

Authors:  Rutvik H Desai; Wonil Choi; Vicky T Lai; John M Henderson
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2016-04-06       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Eye movements during text reading align with the rate of speech production.

Authors:  Benjamin Gagl; Klara Gregorova; Julius Golch; Stefan Hawelka; Jona Sassenhagen; Alessandro Tavano; David Poeppel; Christian J Fiebach
Journal:  Nat Hum Behav       Date:  2021-12-06

9.  The neural substrates of natural reading: a comparison of normal and nonword text using eyetracking and fMRI.

Authors:  Wonil Choi; Rutvik H Desai; John M Henderson
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2014-12-23       Impact factor: 3.169

10.  Shorter spontaneous fixation durations in infants with later emerging autism.

Authors:  Sam V Wass; Emily J H Jones; Teodora Gliga; Tim J Smith; Tony Charman; Mark H Johnson
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-02-06       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.