Literature DB >> 24730600

A signal-detection-based diagnostic-feature-detection model of eyewitness identification.

John T Wixted1, Laura Mickes2.   

Abstract

The theoretical understanding of eyewitness identifications made from a police lineup has long been guided by the distinction between absolute and relative decision strategies. In addition, the accuracy of identifications associated with different eyewitness memory procedures has long been evaluated using measures like the diagnosticity ratio (the correct identification rate divided by the false identification rate). Framed in terms of signal-detection theory, both the absolute/relative distinction and the diagnosticity ratio are mainly relevant to response bias while remaining silent about the key issue of diagnostic accuracy, or discriminability (i.e., the ability to tell the difference between innocent and guilty suspects in a lineup). Here, we propose a signal-detection-based model of eyewitness identification, one that encourages the use of (and helps to conceptualize) receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis to measure discriminability. Recent ROC analyses indicate that the simultaneous presentation of faces in a lineup yields higher discriminability than the presentation of faces in isolation, and we propose a diagnostic feature-detection hypothesis to account for that result. According to this hypothesis, the simultaneous presentation of faces allows the eyewitness to appreciate that certain facial features (viz., those that are shared by everyone in the lineup) are non-diagnostic of guilt. To the extent that those non-diagnostic features are discounted in favor of potentially more diagnostic features, the ability to discriminate innocent from guilty suspects will be enhanced.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24730600     DOI: 10.1037/a0035940

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Rev        ISSN: 0033-295X            Impact factor:   8.934


  23 in total

1.  Optimizing the selection of fillers in police lineups.

Authors:  Melissa F Colloff; Brent M Wilson; Travis M Seale-Carlisle; John T Wixted
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2021-02-23       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 2.  Informal versus formal judgment of statistical models: The case of normality assumptions.

Authors:  Anthony J Bishara; Jiexiang Li; Christian Conley
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2021-03-03

3.  fullROC: An R package for generating and analyzing eyewitness-lineup ROC curves.

Authors:  Yueran Yang; Andrew M Smith
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2022-05-31

4.  Toward a more comprehensive modeling of sequential lineups.

Authors:  David Kellen; Ryan M McAdoo
Journal:  Cogn Res Princ Implic       Date:  2022-07-22

5.  Lineup identification in young and older witnesses: does describing the criminal help or hinder?

Authors:  Juliet S Holdstock; Polly Dalton; Keith A May; Stewart Boogert; Laura Mickes
Journal:  Cogn Res Princ Implic       Date:  2022-06-17

6.  Using objective measures to examine the effect of suspect-filler similarity on eyewitness identification performance.

Authors:  Geoffrey L McKinley; Daniel J Peterson
Journal:  Cogn Res Princ Implic       Date:  2022-10-22

7.  US line-ups outperform UK line-ups.

Authors:  Travis M Seale-Carlisle; Laura Mickes
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2016-09-07       Impact factor: 2.963

8.  Relative judgment theory and the mediation of facial recognition: Implications for theories of eyewitness identification.

Authors:  Ryan M McAdoo; Scott D Gronlund
Journal:  Cogn Res Princ Implic       Date:  2016-11-05

9.  Declines in representational quality and strategic retrieval processes contribute to age-related increases in false recognition.

Authors:  Alexandra N Trelle; Richard N Henson; Deborah A E Green; Jon S Simons
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2017-05-22       Impact factor: 3.051

10.  Perpetrator pose reinstatement during a lineup test increases discrimination accuracy.

Authors:  Melissa F Colloff; Travis M Seale-Carlisle; Nilda Karoğlu; James C Rockey; Harriet M J Smith; Lisa Smith; John Maltby; Sergii Yaremenko; Heather D Flowe
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-07-09       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.