Literature DB >> 24729705

Lateral flow test strip based on colloidal selenium immunoassay for rapid detection of melamine in milk, milk powder, and animal feed.

Zhizeng Wang1, Dejuan Zhi2, Yang Zhao1, Hailong Zhang2, Xin Wang2, Yi Ru1, Hongyu Li3.   

Abstract

Although high melamine (MEL) intake has been proven to cause serious health problems, MEL is sometimes illegally added to milk products and animal feed, arousing serious food safety concerns. A satisfactory method of detecting MEL in onsite or in-home testing is in urgent need of development. This work aimed to explore a rapid, convenient, and cost-effective method of identifying MEL in milk products or other food by colloidal selenium-based lateral flow immunoassay. Colloidal selenium was synthesized by L-ascorbic acid to reduce seleninic acid at room temperature. After conjugation with a monoclonal antibody anti-MEL, a test strip was successfully prepared. The detection limit of the test strip reached 150 μg/kg, 1,000 μg/kg, and 800 μg/kg in liquid milk, milk powder, and animal feed, respectively. No cross-reactions with homologues cyanuric acid, cyanurodiamide, or ammelide were found. Moreover, the MEL test strip can remain stable after storage for 1 year at room temperature. Our results demonstrate that the colloidal selenium MEL test strip can detect MEL in adulterated milk products or animal feed conveniently, rapidly, and sensitively. In contrast with a colloidal gold MEL test strip, the colloidal selenium MEL test strip was easy to prepare and more cost-efficient.

Entities:  

Keywords:  animal feed; dairy food; melamine; milk; selenium nanoparticles; test strip

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24729705      PMCID: PMC3979797          DOI: 10.2147/IJN.S58942

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Nanomedicine        ISSN: 1176-9114


Introduction

Melamine (MEL) is a typical polar organic triazine compound with the chemical formula C3H6N6 that is usually used as an industrial chemical.1,2 There have been several events of MEL being criminally added to milk, milk powder, and other food products in order to artificially elevate the apparent crude protein content by means of its high nitrogen content of 66.7%.3 Excess MEL intake has led to serious health problems.4–9 It has been reported that poisonous pet food resulting from deliberate MEL contamination severely impacted the health of thousands of dogs and cats between 2004 and 2007 in the USA.10 Poisonous milk powder released in 2008 affected over 294,000 children and infants, of whom approximately 54,000 were hospitalized and six died in the People’s Republic of China.11,12 Similar cases have been reported in Vietnam and Singapore.12 MEL-contaminated infant food was also found in 2008 in the USA,12 2010 in the People’s Republic of China,13 and again in 2013 in the USA.14 Although the maximum permitted concentration of MEL has been set at 2.5 mg/kg for both adult food and animal feed and 1.0 mg/kg for infant food by the World Health Organization,11,15,16 illegally contaminated milk products and animal feed are still occasionally found. Because of the serious food safety concerns, there is an urgent need to explore a rapid, sensitive, and inexpensive detection method by which to determine the likelihood of MEL contamination of milk products or animal feeds, especially for onsite and in-home testing. Although methods have been utilized to detect MEL, not all of these are satisfactory. For example, high-performance liquid chromatography alone17–19 or combined with tandem mass spectrometry (MS/MS),18–20 gas chromatography–mass spectrometry,21 capillary electrophoresis,22 infrared spectroscopy,23,24 and nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy25 are highly sensitive but require complicated pretreatment procedures and expensive instruments and equipment. Moreover, most of these tests require large amounts of organic solvents that are dangerous to user health and harmful to the environment.24 The colorimetric method based on colloidal gold3 has been reported recently. Although it is simple, rapid, and economical, some samples still require complicated pretreatment. An alternative method of competitive enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay26 avoids the complex pretreatment, but needs to be operated by a trained professional. All of these MEL detection methods do not meet the requirements for onsite and in-home testing. The only MEL detection device currently available for onsite and in-home testing is a one-step, colloidal gold-based test strip.27–29 Colloidal gold particles are costly,30,31 and the preparation process for colloidal gold is relatively complicated. Considering the drawbacks of current methods for MEL detection, the aims of this study were to employ colloidal selenium particles for binding to antibodies against MEL and prepare a lateral flow test strip based on colloidal selenium immunoassay. The test strip can be prepared simply. Furthermore, it can be used conveniently, rapidly, specifically, in regards to detection substance sensitively, and cost-effectively.

Materials and methods

The following materials were acquired: MEL (Lot 08002; National Institute of Metrology, Beijing, People’s Republic of China); bovine serum albumin (BSA) (Sigma-Aldrich, St Louis, MO, USA); BSA–MEL conjugant (Guangzhou Ebiogenes Biotech Ltd, Guangzhou, People’s Republic of China); anti-MEL monoclonal antibody (McAb) (Guangzhou Ebiogenes Biotech Ltd); Tween 20 (Promega Corporation, Fitchburg, WI, USA); L-ascorbic acid (Sigma-Aldrich); seleninic acid (H2SeO3) (Tianjin Tianhe Chemical Reagent Factory, Tianjin, People’s Republic of China); gum arabic (GA), (Tianjin Bodi Chemical Co, Ltd, Tianjin, People’s Republic of China); goat anti-mouse immunoglobulin G (IgG) (Shanghai Jieyi Biotechnology Co, Ltd, Shanghai, People’s Republic of China); nitrocellulose membrane (NCM) (Merk Millipore, Billerica, MA, USA); glass fiber (SB08; Shanghai Jieyi Biotechnology Co, Ltd); liquid milk (Lanzhou Manor Pasture Co, Ltd, Lanzhou, People’s Republic of China); milk powder (Abbott Laboratories, Abbott Park, IL, USA); and animal feed (Tianjin Guayuelvfa Food Co, Ltd, Tianjin, People’s Republic of China).

Preparation of colloidal selenium particles

Colloidal selenium particles were synthesized by reducing H2SeO3 with L-ascorbic acid, and GA powder was used as a stabilizing agent.32,33 Briefly, 10 mL of 2.5% weight/volume (w/v) GA powder was added to 88 mL of deionized water with continuous stirring for 5 minutes at room temperature (RT), then 1 mL of 0.8 M L-ascorbic acid and 1 mL of 0.2 M H2SeO3 were added with stirring for another 10 minutes to allow the reaction to complete. The colloidal selenium particles were characterized by transmission electron microscopy (TEM).34,35

Preparation of colloidal selenium particle-conjugated McAb anti-MEL

The pH of colloidal selenium was adjusted to 8.3 with 0.1 M K2CO3(potassium carbonate). Then, 50 μL of 1 mg/mL anti-MEL McAb was added in drops to 10 mL colloidal selenium solution with gentle stirring at RT. After the mixture was softly agitated for 10 minutes, antibodies were conjugated to colloidal selenium particle surfaces by physical adsorption. Ten percent (w/v) BSA solution (1.1 mL) was added to the mixture to block the non-coated colloidal selenium particle surfaces for 10 minutes, and then the mixture was centrifuged at 10,000 rpm for 25 minutes. Colloidal selenium particle-conjugated anti-MEL McAb in soft pellet form was collected after being washed twice by centrifugation at 10,000 rpm for 25 minutes. Finally, colloidal selenium particle-conjugated anti-MEL McAb was resuspended in 2 mL dilution buffer (10 mM Tris hydrochloride, containing 1% [w/v] BSA, 0.2% Tween 20, 0.05% [w/v] polyvinylpyrrolidone, and 5% [w/v] sucrose),36–38 and then stored at 4°C before use.39,40

Preparation of MEL test strips

The preparation and assemblage of the immunoassay test device is shown in Figure 1A.37 Briefly, goat anti-mouse IgG and BSA–MEL were separately applied to NCM (2.5 × 2.0 cm) with 3.5 μg in 10 mM phosphate-buffered saline, pH 7.4, to be used as the control zone and the test zone. The distance between the control zone and the test zone was 0.5 cm. The NCM was then dried for 1.5 hours at 37°C to fix the antibody and antigen. The NCM was pasted onto the polyvinyl chloride strip with the adsorption pad on the top end, and the colloidal selenium-conjugated pad overlapped by the sample pad was adhered to the bottom end of the NCM. The colloidal selenium-conjugated pad had been prepared by adding the anti-MEL McAb-coated colloidal selenium nanoparticles (SeNPs) to the SB08 glass fiber (2.5 × 1.0 cm). The resultant conjugated pad was incubated at 37°C for 1.5 hours until fully dried. The sample pad of SB08 glass fiber (2.5 × 2.0 cm) was submerged in 10 mM phosphate-buffered saline, pH 7.4 and containing 0.05% Tween 20, and dried at 37°C for 1.5 hours. Finally, the test device was cut into 5 mm-wide strips and stored at RT before use.36
Figure 1

Schematic diagram of the immunochromatographic melamine test strip.

Notes: (A) The preparation and assembly of the immunoassay melamine test strip. (B) Result judgment of the test strip. C, control line; T, test line.

Determination of the sensitivity and cross-reactivity of MEL test strips

Liquid milk samples were diluted threefold in deionized water, then added standard MEL at concentrations of 0, 1, 5, 10, 50, 100, and 500 μg/L. One gram of milk powder was added to 20 mL deionized water, and spiked standard MEL at concentrations of 0, 1, 5, 10, 50, 100, and 500 μg/L. One gram of animal feed was finely ground, then added to 8 mL deionized water, and spiked standard MEL at concentrations of 0, 1, 5, 10, 50, 100, and 500 μg/L, mixed completely, and stored at RT for 30 minutes before use. Next, 100 μL samples containing liquid milk, milk powder, and animal feed were tested by MEL test strips in triplicate.28 The concentrations of MEL in uncontaminated samples were all testified by the liquid chromatography (LC)–MS/MS method. The limit of detection (LOD) for MEL test strips in milk products was also validated by LC–MS/MS according to previous work by Goscinny et al.18 Five hundred micrograms per liter cyanuric acid, 500 μg/L ammelide, and 500 μg/L cyanurodiamide were added to different samples of liquid milk diluted threefold in deionized water, then 100 μL of each sample was introduced on the strip sample region for cross-reactivity assay.37,41 The results could be observed by the naked eye within 5 minutes. A schematic representation of the immunochromatographic test strip is shown in Figure 1B. The test line-immobilized BSA–MEL can react with anti-MEL McAb, thus capturing adequate colloidal selenium particles to show an orange test line. If there is elevated MEL in the tested sample, the MEL will react with anti-MEL McAb first, leaving insufficient anti-MEL McAb for BSA–MEL to bind to, hence no visible test line can be observed due to lack of colloidal selenium particles. The intensity of the test line color is proportionate to the quantity of MEL in the sample. Similarly, the immobilized goat anti-mouse IgG in the control area will always react with anti-MEL McAb to show an orange line. The positive result is determined by the appearance of an orange line in the control area, but the absence of it in the test area. The negative result is determined by an orange line exhibited in both the test area and the control area. If no visible orange line is present in the control area, the test strip is considered invalid regardless of whether an orange line appears in the test area or not.37

Evaluation of the stability of MEL test strips

The prepared test strip was stored in a desiccator for 1 year, then used to detect different concentrations of MEL in matrix samples as sensitivity assay in triplicate.37,42

Results

Characterization of the colloidal selenium

Colloidal selenium was synthesized by L-ascorbic acid reduction. During the process of selenium particle preparation, the suspension changed from colorless to transparent orange (Figure 2). As with the preparation of colloidal gold,43 gold ions are reduced to gold atoms in solution; in turn, gold atoms immediately aggregate to form gold cores, then gold atoms continuously bind to those gold cores. Finally, gold nanoparticles are achieved. SeNPs are formed similarly, and it is difficult to assay how many selenium atoms on a diameter on picometer level form an SeNP. In our experiment, SeNPs were evaluated under TEM (Figure 3). Our results showed that SeNPs were spherical, with an average diameter of 57.97±6.84 nm. No colloidal selenium particle agglomeration was found, suggesting that GA can keep the colloidal selenium particles stable. Such SeNPs can be resuspended completely, thus meeting the needs of colloidal selenium for probes. After conjugation with antibodies against MEL, the colloidal SeNPs were surrounded evenly by the antibody proteins. The morphological character of antibody-labeled SeNPs was identified with that of colloidal gold particles conjugated by antibodies under TEM in previous work.39
Figure 2

The colloidal selenium as it appears to the naked eye.

Figure 3

The labeling results of colloidal selenium probe were characterized by transmission electron microscopy (TEM).

Notes: (A) Selenium nanoparticles. (B) Labeled selenium nanoparticles (showing the protein halo around the labeled particles).

Sensitivity of MEL test strips in liquid milk, milk powder, and animal feed

Preliminary concentrations of MEL in liquid milk, milk powder, and animal feed were analyzed by LC–MS/MS, and the results showed that they contained MEL at levels of 11.4 μg/kg, 23.6 μg/kg, and 1.15 μg/kg, respectively. Liquid milk, milk powder, and animal feed were spiked with different concentrations of standard MEL, which was then detected by the MEL test strip. Finally, the LOD of MEL in liquid milk, milk powder, and animal feed was determined at 50 μg/L (Figure 4), 50 μg/L (Figure 5), and 100 μg/L (Figure 6), respectively. All the results were repeated in triplicate throughout our experiment. The intensity of the orange test line decreased in proportion to the concentration of MEL in samples from 1 μg/L to 50 μg/L. False positive results were not obtained in any of the tests.
Figure 4

The sensitivity of melamine test strips in liquid milk.

Notes: 1: uncontaminated milk; 2–7: uncontaminated milk spiked with melamine at concentrations of 1, 5, 10, 50, 100, and 500 μg/L, respectively.

Abbreviations: C, control line; T, test line.

Figure 5

The sensitivity of melamine test strips in milk powder.

Notes: 1: uncontaminated milk powder; 2–7: uncontaminated milk powder spiked with melamine at concentrations of 1, 5, 10, 50, 100, and 500 μg/L, respectively.

Abbreviations: C, control line; T, test line.

Figure 6

The sensitivity of melamine test strips in animal feed.

Notes: 1: uncontaminated animal feed; 2–7: uncontaminated animal feed spiked with melamine at concentrations of 10, 20, 50, 100, 200, and 500 μg/L, respectively.

Abbreviations: C, control line; T, test line.

Cross-reactivity of MEL test strips

The cross-reactivity of cyanuric acid, ammelide, and cyanurodiamide on the MEL strips was assayed in triplicate. The results showed that only 500 μg/L of MEL produced a positive result. Negative results were obtained for cyanuric acid, ammelide, and cyanurodiamide (Figure 7), indicating clear specificity of the MEL test strips.
Figure 7

The cross-reactivity test of melamine test strips.

Notes: 1: uncontaminated milk; 2: 500 μg/L cyanuric acid in milk; 3: 500 μg/L ammelide in milk; 4: 500 μg/L cyanurodiamide in milk; 5: 500 μg/L melamine in milk.

Abbreviations: C, control line; T, test line.

Stability of MEL test strips

After MEL test strips were stored in a dry and dark environment for 1 year, they were used for stability analysis. All analyses were completed within 5 minutes. The LODs of the MEL test strips were 50 μg/L in milk products and 100 μg/L in animal feed, respectively (Figures 8–10), identical to the previous tests. No false positive results were found in any of the tests.
Figure 8

The stability assay of melamine test strips after storage in a dry and dark environment for 1 year.

Notes: 1: uncontaminated milk; 2–7: uncontaminated milk spiked with melamine at concentrations of 1, 5, 10, 50, 100, and 500 μg/L, respectively.

Abbreviations: C, control line; T, test line.

Figure 10

The stability assay of melamine test strip in animal feed after 1 year of storage.

Notes: 1: uncontaminated animal feed; 2–7: animal feed spiked with melamine at concentrations of 10, 20, 50, 100, 200, and 500 μg/L, respectively.

Abbreviations: C, control line; T, test line.

Discussion

In this study, appropriate colloidal selenium particles were successfully prepared by using L-ascorbic acid as a reducing agent and GA powder as a stabilizing agent. The colloidal selenium was observed to be transparent and orange in color. Those particles were characterized in spherical form and uniformly dispersed, easily resuspended after centrifugation, shown to be completely coated by protein of anti-MEL McAb under TEM in different batches, and stable after storage for 3 months at RT. Nanoparticle morphology influencing the color signal of the test strip has been reported in a previous investigations study;43 however, it was not found in the present work. Different concentrations of GA were added as a stabilizing agent to prepare the colloidal selenium, then the SeNPs were also assayed by TEM. The results showed that the shape of SeNPs was always spherical, but that size decreased with the concentration of GA. GA at 0.25% concentration was finally chosen due to its resulting in relatively uniform SeNPs with excellent stability and potential for resuspension. Such SeNPs could readily lead to a good color signal on the test strips. During our primary experiment, it was found that the ratio of antibodies to SeNPs affected the detecting result. When SeNPs were conjugated with 0.1 μg or 1 μg antibodies, a very weak control line and test line resulted, thus causing an equivocal result. When 5 μg and 10 μg antibodies were used, a satisfactory result was obtained and the sensitivity and color intensity of the test strip showed no obvious difference. Therefore, the ratio of 5 μg antibody per 1 mL colloidal selenium was used throughout our experiment. The test strip sensitivity reached 50 μg/L and 100 μg/L when detecting MEL in milk products and animal feed, respectively, with no cross-reaction with cyanuric acid, cyanurodiamide, or ammelide. Moreover, the MEL test strip can remain stable for 1 year at RT. When the MEL strip was used in milk products, samples needed to be diluted, or else chromatography could not be performed at all. The LOD of 50 μg/L in milk products was determined after threefold dilution with water. Milk powder diluted with water in a proportion of 1 g milk powder to 20 mL water could be tested with the MEL strip, hence the LOD should be adjusted to 150 μg/kg for liquid milk, and 1,000 μg/kg for milk powder. The dilution fold for animal feed was eight, therefore the LOD is adjusted to 800 μg/kg. Liquid milk samples contaminated at 30 μg/kg and 150 μg/kg MEL were validated by LC–MS/MS. The results showed that 24.90 μg/kg and 141.69 μg/kg MEL were detected, and the relative standard deviation was less than 11.27%. Considering that the levels of MEL permitted by the World Health Organization are 2,500 μg/kg for adult food and animal feed and 1,000 μg/kg for infant food,16 the LODs of the colloidal selenium test strip are sufficient to control MEL limits. MEL contamination presents a clear and present threat to human and animal health. Although colloidal gold MEL test strips are a rapid and sensitive detection tool, the colloidal selenium MEL test strip has been proven to be a more accessible and cost-effective alternative in our present work. Previous works have shown that the LOD of MEL by colloidal gold test strip was 0.26 μg/kg29 and 500 μg/kg in milk products,27 while reaching 1,000 μg/kg and 2,000 μg/kg MEL in milk powder and in animal feeds, respectively.28 The remarkably different results are mainly attributed to whether samples were pretreated with organic solvent, high-speed centrifuge, and an evaporator.28,29 In contrast, samples in our present work only required dilution. Given more complex pretreatment, the LOD of the MEL colloidal selenium test strip would likely be greatly improved. In view of LOD, it could not be ascertained which method achieves greater sensitivity. Compared to colloidal gold, colloidal selenium reduced preparation cost 27-fold (Table 1) under the same amount of labeled antibody. Taken together, the MEL based on colloidal selenium test strip is a highly specific, easy-to-prepare and operate, cost-effective, and sensitive device for the rapid and reproducible detection of MEL.
Table 1

Consumption contrast of 1 liter colloidal gold and colloidal selenium preparation

Type
Colloidal gold
Colloidal selenium
MaterialAuCl4H9O4C6H9Na3O9H2SeO3VcGA
Unit price (USD/g)50.6200.0100.2900.0490.016
Dosage (g)0.1000.1000.2581.4042.500
Cost per dosage (USD)5.0620.0010.0750.0690.040
Total cost (USD)5.0630.184
Ratio5.063/0.184=27.516

Abbreviations: AuCl4H9O4, chloroauric acid tetrahydrate; C6H9Na3O9, trisodium citrate dihydrate; H2SeO3, seleninic acid; Vc, L-ascorbic acid; GA, gum arabic.

It must be noted the situation that the limitation of gray zones in test strips could not be avoided in this study either. When 60–90 μg/kg MEL contained in samples is close to the LOD, the test zone will be very obscure. Thus it is difficult to discriminate the test result by the naked eye. The colloidal selenium immunoassay-based test strip for MEL detection reported herein shows potential for onsite test and in-home testing; however, other approaches would be preferable in a laboratory.

Conclusion

This study is the first to report SeNP-based lateral flow immunoassay for detection of MEL in milk and milk powder. The test strip can be prepared by simple and convenient methods and then detect MEL contamination rapidly, sensitively, and without cross-reaction with its homologues.
  27 in total

1.  Colloidal gold-based immunochromatographic assay for detection of botulinum neurotoxin type B.

Authors:  Der-Jiang Chiao; Rong-Hwa Shyu; Chieh-Shen Hu; Hsien-Yuan Chiang; Shiao-Shek Tang
Journal:  J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci       Date:  2004-09-25       Impact factor: 3.205

2.  Performance of fluorescent europium(III) nanoparticles and colloidal gold reporters in lateral flow bioaffinity assay.

Authors:  Etvi Juntunen; Tiina Myyryläinen; Teppo Salminen; Tero Soukka; Kim Pettersson
Journal:  Anal Biochem       Date:  2012-06-13       Impact factor: 3.365

3.  Melamine detection by mid- and near-infrared (MIR/NIR) spectroscopy: a quick and sensitive method for dairy products analysis including liquid milk, infant formula, and milk powder.

Authors:  Roman M Balabin; Sergey V Smirnov
Journal:  Talanta       Date:  2011-04-19       Impact factor: 6.057

4.  Colloidal gold probe-based immunochromatographic assay for the rapid detection of brevetoxins in fishery product samples.

Authors:  Yu Zhou; Feng-Guang Pan; Yan-Song Li; Yuan-Yuan Zhang; Jun-Hui Zhang; Shi-Ying Lu; Hong-Lin Ren; Zeng-Shan Liu
Journal:  Biosens Bioelectron       Date:  2009-02-02       Impact factor: 10.618

5.  Outbreaks of renal failure associated with melamine and cyanuric acid in dogs and cats in 2004 and 2007.

Authors:  Cathy A Brown; Kyu-Shik Jeong; Robert H Poppenga; Birgit Puschner; Doris M Miller; Angela E Ellis; Kyung-Il Kang; Steffen Sum; Alexis M Cistola; Scott A Brown
Journal:  J Vet Diagn Invest       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 1.279

6.  Rapid detection of melamine adulteration in dairy milk by SB-ATR-Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy.

Authors:  Sana Jawaid; Farah N Talpur; S T H Sherazi; Shafi M Nizamani; Abid A Khaskheli
Journal:  Food Chem       Date:  2013-06-02       Impact factor: 7.514

7.  Lateral-flow colloidal gold-based immunoassay for the rapid detection of deoxynivalenol with two indicator ranges.

Authors:  Anna Yu Kolosova; Liberty Sibanda; Frédéric Dumoulin; Janet Lewis; Etienne Duveiller; Carlos Van Peteghem; Sarah De Saeger
Journal:  Anal Chim Acta       Date:  2008-04-20       Impact factor: 6.558

Review 8.  Melamine toxicity and the kidney.

Authors:  Anthony Kai-ching Hau; Tze Hoi Kwan; Philip Kam-tao Li
Journal:  J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2009-02-04       Impact factor: 10.121

9.  The melamine incident: implications for international food and feed safety.

Authors:  Céline Marie-Elise Gossner; Jørgen Schlundt; Peter Ben Embarek; Susan Hird; Danilo Lo-Fo-Wong; Jose Javier Ocampo Beltran; Keng Ngee Teoh; Angelika Tritscher
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2009-08-06       Impact factor: 9.031

10.  Public-health risks of melamine in milk products.

Authors:  E Y Y Chan; S M Griffiths; C W Chan
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2008-10-25       Impact factor: 79.321

View more
  12 in total

1.  Nucleic acid lateral flow assays using a conjugate of a DNA binding protein and carbon nanoparticles.

Authors:  Gülsen Betül Aktas; Jan H Wichers; Vasso Skouridou; Aart van Amerongen; Lluis Masip
Journal:  Mikrochim Acta       Date:  2019-06-11       Impact factor: 5.833

2.  Development of multiple cross displacement amplification label-based gold nanoparticles lateral flow biosensor for detection of Listeria monocytogenes.

Authors:  Yi Wang; Hui Li; Yan Wang; Hua Li; Lijuan Luo; Jianguo Xu; Changyun Ye
Journal:  Int J Nanomedicine       Date:  2017-01-12

3.  EDTA-K2 Improves the Detection Sensitivity of SARS-CoV-2 IgM and IgG Antibodies by Chelating Colloidal Gold in the Immunochromatographic Assay.

Authors:  Xiumei Hu; Changmeng Wu; Bo Situ; Peifu Tian; Taixue An; Qiang Li; Weilun Pan; Ruyi Zhang; Biao Yang; Dehua Sun; Yuhai Hu; Qian Wang; Lei Zheng
Journal:  Int J Nanomedicine       Date:  2021-01-29

4.  Rapid Detection of Ractopamine and Salbutamol in Swine Urine by Immunochromatography Based on Selenium Nanoparticles.

Authors:  Zhizeng Wang; Qianqwen Zhou; Yafei Guo; Hangzhan Hu; Zhi Zheng; Shulian Li; Yaohui Wang; Yuanfang Ma
Journal:  Int J Nanomedicine       Date:  2021-03-09

5.  Stacking and analysis of melamine in milk products with acetonitrile-salt stacking technique in capillary electrophoresis.

Authors:  Yu Kong; Chong Wei; Zhanwu Hou; Zilong Wang; Jiaqiang Yuan; Jiang Yu; Yongxi Zhao; Yuhai Tang; Meili Gao
Journal:  J Anal Methods Chem       Date:  2014-08-18       Impact factor: 2.193

6.  Preparation of Monoclonal Antibody for Brevetoxin 1 and Development of Ic-ELISA and Colloidal Gold Strip to Detect Brevetoxin 1.

Authors:  Sumei Ling; Shiwei Xiao; Chengjie Xie; Rongzhi Wang; Linmao Zeng; Ke Wang; Danping Zhang; Xiulan Li; Shihua Wang
Journal:  Toxins (Basel)       Date:  2018-02-08       Impact factor: 4.546

7.  Development of a Sensitive Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay and Rapid Gold Nanoparticle Immunochromatographic Strip for Detecting Citrinin in Monascus Fermented Food.

Authors:  Shih-Wei Wu; Yao-An Yu; Biing-Hui Liu; Feng-Yih Yu
Journal:  Toxins (Basel)       Date:  2018-09-02       Impact factor: 4.546

8.  Development of ELISA and Lateral Flow Immunoassays for Ochratoxins (OTA and OTB) Detection Based on Monoclonal Antibody.

Authors:  Mohamed Hassan Fadlalla; Sumei Ling; Rongzhi Wang; Xiulan Li; Jun Yuan; Shiwei Xiao; Ke Wang; Shuqin Tang; Hoyda Elsir; Shihua Wang
Journal:  Front Cell Infect Microbiol       Date:  2020-03-06       Impact factor: 5.293

Review 9.  Signal amplification and quantification on lateral flow assays by laser excitation of plasmonic nanomaterials.

Authors:  Haihang Ye; Yaning Liu; Li Zhan; Yilin Liu; Zhenpeng Qin
Journal:  Theranostics       Date:  2020-03-15       Impact factor: 11.556

10.  Carboxyl-Functionalized, Europium Nanoparticle-Based Fluorescent Immunochromatographic Assay for Sensitive Detection of Citrinin in Monascus Fermented Food.

Authors:  Erjing Chen; Ying Xu; Biao Ma; Haifeng Cui; Chuanxin Sun; Mingzhou Zhang
Journal:  Toxins (Basel)       Date:  2019-10-17       Impact factor: 4.546

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.