| Literature DB >> 32211342 |
Mohamed Hassan Fadlalla1,2, Sumei Ling1,2,3, Rongzhi Wang1,2,3, Xiulan Li1,2, Jun Yuan1,2, Shiwei Xiao1,3, Ke Wang1,2, Shuqin Tang1,2, Hoyda Elsir1,2, Shihua Wang1,2,3.
Abstract
Ochratoxins were important secondary metabolites secreted by fungi, and OTA and OTB are mainly significant mycotoxin, having toxic effects on humans and animals. Therefore, it is important to establish a rapid, sensitive, and precise method for ochratoxins detection and quantification in real samples. In this study, a stable monoclonal antibody (mAb) that recognizing both OTA and OTB toxins was employed for the establishment of indirect competitive ELISA (ic-ELISA), colloidal gold nanoparticles (CGNs), and nanoflowers gold strips (AuNFs) for detection of ochratoxins in real samples. A 6E5 hybridoma cell line stable secreting mAb against both OTA and OTB toxins was obtained by fusion of splenocytes with myeloma SP2/0 cells. The 6E5 mAb had a high affinity (3.7 × 108 L/mol) to OTA, and also showed similar binding activity to OTB. The optimized ic-ELISA resulted in a linear range of 0.06-0.6 ng/mL for ochratoxins (OTA and OTB) detection. The IC50 was 0.2 ng/mL and the limit of detection (LOD) was 0.03 ng/mL. The mean recovery rate from the spiked samples was 89.315 ± 2.257%, with a coefficient variation of 2.182%. The result from lateral flow immunoassays indicated that the LOD of CGNs and AuNFs were 5 and 1 μg/mL, respectively. All these results indicated that the developed ic-ELISA, CGNs, and AuNFs in this study could be used for the analysis of the residual of ochratoxins (OTA and OTB) in food and agricultural products.Entities:
Keywords: colloidal gold strip; hybridoma technology; ic-ELISA; monoclonal antibody; nanoflowers gold strip; ochratoxins
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32211342 PMCID: PMC7067699 DOI: 10.3389/fcimb.2020.00080
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Cell Infect Microbiol ISSN: 2235-2988 Impact factor: 5.293
Figure 1Ochratoxins structure and titer of mice serum. (A) Chemical structure of Ochratoxin A (OTA). (B) Chemical structure of Ochratoxin B (OTB). (C) Anti-OTA titer of serum was assayed by iELISA. Mice 1 showed the highest antibody titer as compared to control mouse.
Figure 2Isotypes and chromosome analysis of hybridoma cell 6E5. (A) Isotyping of 6E5 cell by using an isotyping kit. (B) Chromosome analysis of hybridoma cell 6E5.
Figure 3Cross-reactivity and affinity of mAb from 6E5. (A) Purification analysis of mAb from ascites by sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE). Lane M, standard protein marker. Lane 1, purified mAb. Lane 2, unpurified ascites fluid. (B) Affinity result of mAb at different concentration of coating antigen. (C) Cross-reactivity of purified mAb to structurally related mycotoxin.
Figure 4Standard curves for OTA detection. (A) A typical calibration curve illustrated by plotting (B/B0) against OTA concentration. The equation is y = 0.04485 + (0.89135–0.04485)/ (1 + x/0.29904)1.07622, with a correlation coefficient (R2) of 0.98295. (B) Standard linear curve of inhibition competitive ELISA. The linear equation was y = 0.6294x + 0.753, with a correlation coefficient (R2) of 0.8453.
Figure 5Construction and characterization of the colloidal gold strip test. (A) The explanation for strip test results. Positive is indicated if only stained line was in control line (a). Negative is indicated if both control and test zone were stained lines (b). An invalid result occurred because of no-formation of control line (c, d). (B) Cross-reactivity of the test strip with other toxins, such as OTB, CTN, FB1, DON, and ZEN. (C) Detection limit of colloidal gold strip test for OTA. (D) Detection of real samples for ochratoxins.
Figure 6Construction and characterization of the gold nanoflowers strip test. (A) TEM image of AuNFs. (B) The UV-visible spectra of AuNFs. (C) Cross-reactivity of the test strip with other toxins. (D) Detection limit of AuNFs. (E) Detection of real sample solution for ochratoxins.