BACKGROUND: Cancer survivors often experience cognitive difficulties after treatment completion. Although chemotherapy enhances risk for cognitive problems, it is likely only one piece of a complex puzzle that explains survivors' cognitive functioning. Loneliness may be one psychosocial risk factor. The current studies included both subjective and objective cognitive measures and tested whether lonelier breast cancer survivors would have more concentration and memory complaints and experience more concentration difficulties than their less lonely counterparts. METHODS: The relationship between loneliness and cognitive function was tested among three samples of breast cancer survivors. Study 1 was a sample of breast cancer survivors (n = 200) who reported their concentration and memory problems. Study 2a was a sample of breast cancer survivors (n = 185) and noncancer controls (n = 93) who reported their concentration and memory problems. Study 2b was a subsample of Study 2a breast cancer survivors (n = 22) and noncancer controls (n = 21) who completed a standardized neuropsychological test assessing concentration. RESULTS: Studies 1 and 2a revealed that lonelier women reported more concentration and memory problems than less lonely women. Study 2b utilized a standardized neuropsychological continuous performance test and demonstrated that lonelier women experienced more concentration problems than their less lonely counterparts. CONCLUSIONS: These studies demonstrated that loneliness is linked to concentration and memory complaints and the experience of concentration problems among breast cancer survivors. The results were also highly consistent across three samples of breast cancer survivors. These data suggest that loneliness may be a risk factor for cognitive difficulties among cancer survivors.
BACKGROUND:Cancer survivors often experience cognitive difficulties after treatment completion. Although chemotherapy enhances risk for cognitive problems, it is likely only one piece of a complex puzzle that explains survivors' cognitive functioning. Loneliness may be one psychosocial risk factor. The current studies included both subjective and objective cognitive measures and tested whether lonelier breast cancer survivors would have more concentration and memory complaints and experience more concentration difficulties than their less lonely counterparts. METHODS: The relationship between loneliness and cognitive function was tested among three samples of breast cancer survivors. Study 1 was a sample of breast cancer survivors (n = 200) who reported their concentration and memory problems. Study 2a was a sample of breast cancer survivors (n = 185) and noncancer controls (n = 93) who reported their concentration and memory problems. Study 2b was a subsample of Study 2a breast cancer survivors (n = 22) and noncancer controls (n = 21) who completed a standardized neuropsychological test assessing concentration. RESULTS: Studies 1 and 2a revealed that lonelier women reported more concentration and memory problems than less lonely women. Study 2b utilized a standardized neuropsychological continuous performance test and demonstrated that lonelier women experienced more concentration problems than their less lonely counterparts. CONCLUSIONS: These studies demonstrated that loneliness is linked to concentration and memory complaints and the experience of concentration problems among breast cancer survivors. The results were also highly consistent across three samples of breast cancer survivors. These data suggest that loneliness may be a risk factor for cognitive difficulties among cancer survivors.
Authors: Tim A Ahles; Andrew J Saykin; Charlotte T Furstenberg; Bernard Cole; Leila A Mott; Karen Skalla; Marie B Whedon; Sarah Bivens; Tara Mitchell; E Robert Greenberg; Peter M Silberfarb Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2002-01-15 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Ruth A Hackett; Mark Hamer; Romano Endrighi; Lena Brydon; Andrew Steptoe Journal: Psychoneuroendocrinology Date: 2012-04-12 Impact factor: 4.905
Authors: Lianne M Kurina; Kristen L Knutson; Louise C Hawkley; John T Cacioppo; Diane S Lauderdale; Carole Ober Journal: Sleep Date: 2011-11-01 Impact factor: 5.849
Authors: Sadhna Kohli; Jennifer J Griggs; Joseph A Roscoe; Pascal Jean-Pierre; Christopher Bole; Karen M Mustian; Renae Hill; Kelly Smith; Howard Gross; Gary R Morrow Journal: J Oncol Pract Date: 2007-03 Impact factor: 3.840
Authors: Heather S L Jim; Kristin M Phillips; Sari Chait; Leigh Anne Faul; Mihaela A Popa; Yun-Hsiang Lee; Mallory G Hussin; Paul B Jacobsen; Brent J Small Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2012-08-27 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Janice K Kiecolt-Glaser; Jeanette M Bennett; Rebecca Andridge; Juan Peng; Charles L Shapiro; William B Malarkey; Charles F Emery; Rachel Layman; Ewa E Mrozek; Ronald Glaser Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2014-01-27 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Mackenzi Pergolotti; Nicolò Matteo Luca Battisti; Lynne Padgett; Alix G Sleight; Maya Abdallah; Robin Newman; Kathleen Van Dyk; Kelley R Covington; Grant R Williams; Frederiek van den Bos; YaoYao Pollock; Elizabeth A Salerno; Allison Magnuson; Isabella F Gattás-Vernaglia; Tim A Ahles Journal: J Geriatr Oncol Date: 2019-10-14 Impact factor: 3.599
Authors: Rebecca N Adams; Catherine E Mosher; Kevin L Rand; Adam T Hirsh; Patrick O Monahan; Rafat Abonour; Kurt Kroenke Journal: Qual Life Res Date: 2017-02-24 Impact factor: 4.147
Authors: Christine Miaskowski; Steven M Paul; Karin Snowberg; Maura Abbott; Hala T Borno; Susan M Chang; Lee May Chen; Bevin Cohen; Bruce A Cooper; Marilyn J Hammer; Stacey A Kenfield; Kord M Kober; Angela Laffan; Jon D Levine; Rachel Pozzar; Kim Rhoads; Katy K Tsai; Erin L Van Blarigan; Katherine Van Loon Journal: Cancer Date: 2021-04-27 Impact factor: 6.921
Authors: Tomasz J Guzik; Saidi A Mohiddin; Anthony Dimarco; Vimal Patel; Kostas Savvatis; Federica M Marelli-Berg; Meena S Madhur; Maciej Tomaszewski; Pasquale Maffia; Fulvio D'Acquisto; Stuart A Nicklin; Ali J Marian; Ryszard Nosalski; Eleanor C Murray; Bartlomiej Guzik; Colin Berry; Rhian M Touyz; Reinhold Kreutz; Dao Wen Wang; David Bhella; Orlando Sagliocco; Filippo Crea; Emma C Thomson; Iain B McInnes Journal: Cardiovasc Res Date: 2020-08-01 Impact factor: 10.787