Literature DB >> 24729271

Population pharmacokinetics of hydroxyurea for children and adolescents with sickle cell disease.

Paweł Wiczling1, Robert I Liem, Julie A Panepinto, Uttam Garg, Susan M Abdel-Rahman, Gregory L Kearns, Kathleen A Neville.   

Abstract

The objective of this study was to develop a population pharmacokinetic (PK) model sufficient to describe hydroxyurea (HU) concentrations in serum and urine following oral drug administration in pediatric patients with sickle cell disease. Additionally, the measured hydroxyurea concentrations for particular sampling time were correlated with exposure measures (AUC) to find the most predictive relationship. Hydroxyurea concentrations were determined in 21 subjects. Using a population nonlinear mixed-effect modeling, the HU PK was best described by a one-compartment model with two elimination pathways (metabolic and renal) and a transit compartment absorption. The typical mean absorption time was 0.222 hour. The typical apparent volume of distribution was 21.8 L and the apparent systemic clearance was 6.88 L/h for an average weight patient of 30.7 kg. The 50% of the HU dose was renally excreted. Linear correlations were apparent between the plasma HU concentration at 1, 1.5, 2, 4, and 6 hours post-dose and AUC with the most significant (R(2)  = 0.71) observed at 1.5 hours. A population PK model was successful in describing HU disposition in plasma and urine. Data from the model also demonstrated that HU plasma concentrations at 1.5 hours after an oral dose of the drug were highly predictive of systemic drug exposure.
© 2014, The American College of Clinical Pharmacology.

Entities:  

Keywords:  hydroxyurea; sickle cell disease; therapeutic drug monitoring

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24729271     DOI: 10.1002/jcph.303

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Pharmacol        ISSN: 0091-2700            Impact factor:   3.126


  10 in total

1.  A clinically meaningful fetal hemoglobin threshold for children with sickle cell anemia during hydroxyurea therapy.

Authors:  Jeremie H Estepp; Matthew P Smeltzer; Guolian Kang; Chen Li; Winfred C Wang; Christina Abrams; Banu Aygun; Russell E Ware; Kerri Nottage; Jane S Hankins
Journal:  Am J Hematol       Date:  2017-09-28       Impact factor: 10.047

2.  Model-based dosing with concentration feedback as an integral part of personalized hydroxycarbamide management.

Authors:  Min Dong; Patrick T McGann; Tomoyuki Mizuno; Russell E Ware; Alexander A Vinks
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2018-04-17       Impact factor: 4.335

3.  Pharmacokinetics and bioequivalence of a liquid formulation of hydroxyurea in children with sickle cell anemia.

Authors:  Jeremie H Estepp; Chiara Melloni; Courtney D Thornburg; Paweł Wiczling; Zora Rogers; Jennifer A Rothman; Nancy S Green; Robert Liem; Amanda M Brandow; Shelley E Crary; Thomas H Howard; Maurine H Morris; Andrew Lewandowski; Uttam Garg; William J Jusko; Kathleen A Neville
Journal:  J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2015-10-15       Impact factor: 3.126

4.  Compounded Nonsterile Preparations and FDA-Approved Commercially Available Liquid Products for Children: A North American Update.

Authors:  Richard H Parrish; Lisa D Ashworth; Raimar Löbenberg; Sandra Benavides; Jeffrey J Cies; Robert B MacArthur
Journal:  Pharmaceutics       Date:  2022-05-10       Impact factor: 6.525

5.  Mathematical Modeling of Hydroxyurea Therapy in Individuals with Sickle Cell Disease.

Authors:  Akancha Pandey; Jeremie H Estepp; Rubesh Raja; Guolian Kang; Doraiswami Ramkrishna
Journal:  Pharmaceutics       Date:  2022-05-16       Impact factor: 6.525

6.  Development of a pharmacokinetic-guided dose individualization strategy for hydroxyurea treatment in children with sickle cell anaemia.

Authors:  Min Dong; Patrick T McGann; Tomoyuki Mizuno; Russell E Ware; Alexander A Vinks
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2016-02-05       Impact factor: 4.335

7.  Hydroxycarbamide in children with sickle cell anaemia after first-dose vs. chronic therapy: pharmacokinetics and predictive models for drug exposure.

Authors:  Jeremie H Estepp; Paweł Wiczling; Joseph Moen; Guolian Kang; Joana Marie Mack; Robert Liem; Julie A Panepinto; Uttam Garg; Gregory Kearns; Kathleen A Neville
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2017-11-28       Impact factor: 4.335

8.  Population Pharmacokinetic and Exposure-Response Analyses of Prasugrel in Pediatric Patients with Sickle Cell Anemia.

Authors:  Brian A Moser; Elizabeth S LaBell; Emmanuel Chigutsa; Joseph A Jakubowski; David S Small
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 6.447

9.  Combined use of subclinical hydroxyurea and CHK1 inhibitor effectively controls melanoma and lung cancer progression, with reduced normal tissue toxicity compared to gemcitabine.

Authors:  Zay Yar Oo; Martina Proctor; Alexander J Stevenson; Deborah Nazareth; Madushan Fernando; Sheena M Daignault; Catherine Lanagan; Sebastian Walpole; Vanessa Bonazzi; Dubravka Škalamera; Cameron Snell; Nikolas K Haass; Jill E Larsen; Brian Gabrielli
Journal:  Mol Oncol       Date:  2019-06-14       Impact factor: 6.603

10.  Optimizing Hydroxyurea Treatment for Sickle Cell Disease Patients: The Pharmacokinetic Approach.

Authors:  Charlotte Nazon; Amelia-Naomi Sabo; Guillaume Becker; Jean-Marc Lessinger; Véronique Kemmel; Catherine Paillard
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2019-10-16       Impact factor: 4.241

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.