Literature DB >> 24728823

Minimum nodal yield in oral squamous cell carcinoma: defining the standard of care in a multicenter international pooled validation study.

Ardalan Ebrahimi1, Jonathan R Clark, M Amit, T C Yen, Chun-Ta Liao, Luis P Kowalski, Matthias Kreppel, Claudio R Cernea, Gideon Bachar, Andrea Bolzoni Villaret, Dan Fliss, Eran Fridman, K T Robbins, Jatin P Shah, Snehal G Patel, Ziv Gil.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: There is evidence to suggest that a nodal yield <18 is an independent prognostic factor in patients with clinically node negative (cN0) oral squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) treated with elective neck dissection (END). We sought to evaluate this hypothesis with external validation and to investigate for heterogeneity between institutions. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We analyzed pooled individual data from 1,567 patients treated at nine comprehensive cancer centers worldwide between 1970 and 2011. Nodal yield was assessed with Cox proportional hazard models, stratified by study center, and adjusted for age, sex, pathological T and N stage, margin status, extracapsular nodal spread, time period of primary treatment, and adjuvant therapy. Two-stage random-effects meta-analyses were used to investigate for heterogeneity between institutions.
RESULTS: In multivariable analyses of patients undergoing selective neck dissection, nodal yield <18 was associated with reduced overall survival [hazard ratio (HR) 1.69; 95 % confidence interval (CI) 1.22-2.34; p = 0.002] and disease-specific survival (HR 1.88; 95 % CI 1.21-2.91; p = 0.005), and increased risk of locoregional recurrence (HR 1.53; 95 % CI 1.04-2.26; p = 0.032). Despite significant differences between institutions in terms of patient clinicopathological factors, nodal yield, and outcomes, random-effects meta-analysis demonstrated no evidence of heterogeneity between centers in regards to the impact of nodal yield on disease-specific survival (p = 0.663; I (2) statistic = 0).
CONCLUSION: Our data confirm that nodal yield is a robust independent prognostic factor in patients undergoing END for cN0 oral SCC, and may be applied irrespective of the underlying patient population and treating institution. A minimum adequate lymphadenectomy in this setting should include at least 18 nodes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24728823     DOI: 10.1245/s10434-014-3702-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol        ISSN: 1068-9265            Impact factor:   5.344


  22 in total

1.  Evaluation of Quality Metrics for Surgically Treated Laryngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma.

Authors:  Evan M Graboyes; Melanie E Townsend; Dorina Kallogjeri; Jay F Piccirillo; Brian Nussenbaum
Journal:  JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2016-12-01       Impact factor: 6.223

2.  Association of Compliance With Process-Related Quality Metrics and Improved Survival in Oral Cavity Squamous Cell Carcinoma.

Authors:  Evan M Graboyes; Jennifer Gross; Dorina Kallogjeri; Jay F Piccirillo; Maha Al-Gilani; Michael E Stadler; Brian Nussenbaum
Journal:  JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2016-05-01       Impact factor: 6.223

3.  The impact of surgical technique on neck dissection nodal yield: making a difference.

Authors:  Balazs B Lörincz; Felix Langwieder; Nikolaus Möckelmann; Susanne Sehner; Rainald Knecht
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2015-03-18       Impact factor: 2.503

4.  Lymph node yield and lymph node density for elective level II-IV neck dissections in laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma patients.

Authors:  Melih Cayonu; Evrim Unsal Tuna; Aydın Acar; Ayse Secil Kayalı Dinc; Muammer Melih Sahin; Suleyman Boynuegri; Adil Eryilmaz
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2019-07-17       Impact factor: 2.503

5.  [In head and neck cancer the number of dissected lymph nodes predicts mortality].

Authors:  Marlen Haderlein; Rainer Fietkau
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 3.621

6.  The origin of failure, and an opportunity to learn.

Authors:  Balazs B Lörincz
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2017-03-10       Impact factor: 2.503

7.  Establishing quality indicators for neck dissection: Correlating the number of lymph nodes with oncologic outcomes (NRG Oncology RTOG 9501 and RTOG 0234).

Authors:  Vasu Divi; Jonathan Harris; Paul M Harari; Jay S Cooper; Jonathan McHugh; Diana Bell; Erich M Sturgis; Anthony J Cmelak; Mohan Suntharalingam; David Raben; Harold Kim; Sharon A Spencer; George E Laramore; Andy Trotti; Robert L Foote; Christopher Schultz; Wade L Thorstad; Qiang Ed Zhang; Quynh Thu Le; F Christopher Holsinger
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2016-07-15       Impact factor: 6.860

8.  Management of the Neck in Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Oral Cavity and Oropharynx: ASCO Clinical Practice Guideline.

Authors:  Shlomo A Koyfman; Nofisat Ismaila; Doug Crook; Anil D'Cruz; Cristina P Rodriguez; David J Sher; Damian Silbermins; Erich M Sturgis; Terance T Tsue; Jared Weiss; Sue S Yom; F Christopher Holsinger
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2019-02-27       Impact factor: 44.544

9.  The role of adjuvant treatment in early-stage oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma: An international collaborative study.

Authors:  Eran Fridman; Shorook Na'ara; Jaiprakash Agarwal; Moran Amit; Gideon Bachar; Andrea Bolzoni Villaret; Jose Brandao; Claudio R Cernea; Pankaj Chaturvedi; Jonathan Clark; Ardalan Ebrahimi; Dan M Fliss; Sashikanth Jonnalagadda; Hugo F Kohler; Luiz P Kowalski; Matthias Kreppel; Chun-Ta Liao; Snehal G Patel; Rajan S Patel; K Thomas Robbins; Jatin P Shah; Thomas Shpitzer; Tzu-Chen Yen; Joachim E Zöller; Ziv Gil
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2018-05-14       Impact factor: 6.860

10.  Lymph Node Yield and Ratio in Selective and Modified Radical Neck Dissection in Head and Neck Cancer-Impact on Oncological Outcome.

Authors:  Sean C Sheppard; Lukas Frech; Roland Giger; Lluís Nisa
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-04       Impact factor: 6.639

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.