Yanwen Jiang1, Qing Yuan, Qiuhong Fang. 1. Department of Respiratory Medicine, Beijing Shijitan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100038, People's Republic of China, jiangyanwen2009@163.com.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Tyrosine-kinase inhibitors (TKIs) and chemotherapy had different pharmacological mechanisms and therefore combined administration of TKIs and chemotherapy agents may have synergy. Our research aimed at exploring the cytotoxic interactions between gefitinib and docetaxel with different concentrations for non-small-cell lung cancer cell lines, and furthermore, the mechanisms underlying the cytotoxic synergism. METHODS: NCI-H1650 [epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation and KRAS wild-type], NCI-H292 (EGFR wild-type and KRAS wild-type) and A549 (EGFR wild-type and KRAS mutation) cell lines were treated with docetaxel and/or gefitinib. Cytotoxic interactions, cell cycle distribution and cell signal pathway were analyzed, respectively. RESULTS: Cytotoxic interactions between docetaxel and gefitinib were dose-dependent and sequence-dependent in all these three cell lines. Docetaxel followed by gefitinib treatment was optimum regimen regardless of the mutation status of EGFR and KRAS. KRAS mutation and EGFR wild-type predicted insensitive to gefitinib and docetaxel combined treatment as well as gefitinib alone. G1 arrest was inconsistently associated with combination index (CI). However, apoptosis induction was schedule-dependent and can explain the synergism completely. Mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) phosphorylation ratio was also schedule-dependent and positively correlated with CI. CONCLUSION: Cytotoxic interactions between docetaxel and gefitinib were sequence-dependent regardless of the mutation status of EGFR and KRAS. Cell characteristic, apoptosis induction and MAPK phosphorylation but not cell cycle change may explain the molecular mechanisms of synergism.
BACKGROUND: Tyrosine-kinase inhibitors (TKIs) and chemotherapy had different pharmacological mechanisms and therefore combined administration of TKIs and chemotherapy agents may have synergy. Our research aimed at exploring the cytotoxic interactions between gefitinib and docetaxel with different concentrations for non-small-cell lung cancer cell lines, and furthermore, the mechanisms underlying the cytotoxic synergism. METHODS: NCI-H1650 [epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation and KRAS wild-type], NCI-H292 (EGFR wild-type and KRAS wild-type) and A549 (EGFR wild-type and KRAS mutation) cell lines were treated with docetaxel and/or gefitinib. Cytotoxic interactions, cell cycle distribution and cell signal pathway were analyzed, respectively. RESULTS:Cytotoxic interactions between docetaxel and gefitinib were dose-dependent and sequence-dependent in all these three cell lines. Docetaxel followed by gefitinib treatment was optimum regimen regardless of the mutation status of EGFR and KRAS. KRAS mutation and EGFR wild-type predicted insensitive to gefitinib and docetaxel combined treatment as well as gefitinib alone. G1 arrest was inconsistently associated with combination index (CI). However, apoptosis induction was schedule-dependent and can explain the synergism completely. Mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) phosphorylation ratio was also schedule-dependent and positively correlated with CI. CONCLUSION:Cytotoxic interactions between docetaxel and gefitinib were sequence-dependent regardless of the mutation status of EGFR and KRAS. Cell characteristic, apoptosis induction and MAPK phosphorylation but not cell cycle change may explain the molecular mechanisms of synergism.
Authors: Patrick Y Chun; Felix Y Feng; Ashley M Scheurer; Mary A Davis; Theodore S Lawrence; Mukesh K Nyati Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2006-01-15 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: Giuseppe Giaccone; Roy S Herbst; Christian Manegold; Giorgio Scagliotti; Rafael Rosell; Vincent Miller; Ronald B Natale; Joan H Schiller; Joachim Von Pawel; Anna Pluzanska; Ulrich Gatzemeier; John Grous; Judith S Ochs; Steven D Averbuch; Michael K Wolf; Pamela Rennie; Abderrahim Fandi; David H Johnson Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2004-03-01 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Jeffrey P MacKeigan; Debra J Taxman; Deborah Hunter; H Shelton Earp; Lee M Graves; Jenny P-Y Ting Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2002-07 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Ulrich Gatzemeier; Anna Pluzanska; Aleksandra Szczesna; Eckhard Kaukel; Jaromir Roubec; Flavio De Rosa; Janusz Milanowski; Hanna Karnicka-Mlodkowski; Milos Pesek; Piotr Serwatowski; Rodryg Ramlau; Terezie Janaskova; Johan Vansteenkiste; Janos Strausz; Georgy Moiseevich Manikhas; Joachim Von Pawel Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2007-04-20 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Christopher M Mahaffey; Angela M Davies; Primo N Lara; Brandi Pryde; William Holland; Philip C Mack; Paul H Gumerlock; David R Gandara Journal: Clin Lung Cancer Date: 2007-11 Impact factor: 4.785