Literature DB >> 24727534

Examining regional variation in the use of cancer screening in Germany.

Verena Vogt1, Martin Siegel2, Leonie Sundmacher3.   

Abstract

The detection of cancer in its early latent stages can improve a patient's chances of recovery and thereby reduce the overall burden of the disease. Cancer screening services are, however, only used by a small part of the population and utilization rates vary widely amongst the 402 German districts. This study examines to which extent geographic variation in the use of cancer screening can be explained by accessibility of these services and by spillover effects between adjacent areas, while controlling for a wide range of covariates. District level data on cancer screening utilization rates were calculated for breast, cervical, prostate, skin, and colorectal cancers using German data provided by the National Association of Statutory Health Insurance Physicians (Kassenärztliche Bundesvereinigung - KBV) between 2008 and 2011. We estimated the impact of health service variables on cancer screening utilization using spatial and non-spatial regression models. Spatial autocorrelation in the residuals was estimated using Moran's I statistic. After controlling for socioeconomic and other regional covariates, screening rates for breast, prostate, skin, and colorectal cancers are significantly higher in areas with higher physician density. The utilization of Pap-tests, skin cancer screening and colonoscopies is inversely related with average travel time to physicians. The coefficients for the spatial lag are significant and positive in all models. The positive spatial lags indicate that screening utilization rates are determined by knowledge spillovers between neighboring districts. In terms of public policy, our study demonstrates the potential to increase the use of cancer screening services through improving knowledge regarding cancer screening and by ensuring patient access to cancer screening services.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cancer screening; Germany; Health care access; Spatial analysis

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24727534     DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2014.03.033

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Soc Sci Med        ISSN: 0277-9536            Impact factor:   4.634


  16 in total

1.  Neighborhood effects in a behavioral randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Sandi L Pruitt; Tammy Leonard; James Murdoch; Amy Hughes; Amy McQueen; Samir Gupta
Journal:  Health Place       Date:  2014-11-21       Impact factor: 4.078

2.  Diagnose earlier, live longer? The impact of cervical and breast cancer screening on life span.

Authors:  Zhenjie Yang; Juan Liu; Qing Wang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-07-20       Impact factor: 3.752

3.  Frequency and management of emergencies in primary care offices: A cross-sectional study in northwestern Germany.

Authors:  Max Melzel; Falk Hoffmann; Michael H Freitag; Ove Spreckelsen
Journal:  Eur J Gen Pract       Date:  2022-12       Impact factor: 3.636

4.  Determinants of health check attendance in adults: findings from the cross-sectional German Health Update (GEDA) study.

Authors:  Jens Hoebel; Anne Starker; Susanne Jordan; Matthias Richter; Thomas Lampert
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2014-09-04       Impact factor: 3.295

5.  Factors related to breast cancer detection mode and time to diagnosis in Alberta, Canada: a population-based retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Yan Yuan; Maoji Li; Jing Yang; Tracy Elliot; Kelly Dabbs; James A Dickinson; Stacey Fisher; Marcy Winget
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2016-02-19       Impact factor: 2.655

6.  Participation in cancer screening among female migrants and non-migrants in Germany: A cross-sectional study on the role of demographic and socioeconomic factors.

Authors:  Patrick Brzoska; Chadi Abdul-Rida
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 1.889

7.  Geographic variation in health insurance benefits in Qianjiang District, China: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Yue Wu; Liang Zhang; Xuejiao Liu; Ting Ye; Yongfei Wang
Journal:  Int J Equity Health       Date:  2018-02-05

8.  Spatial distribution of mammography adherence in a Swiss urban population and its association with socioeconomic status.

Authors:  José Luis Sandoval; Rebecca Himsl; Jean-Marc Theler; Jean-Michel Gaspoz; Stéphane Joost; Idris Guessous
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2018-10-25       Impact factor: 4.452

9.  General practitioners who never perform Pap smear: the medical offer and the socio-economic context around their office could limit their involvement in cervical cancer screening.

Authors:  Chiara Maj; Lorraine Poncet; Henri Panjo; Arnaud Gautier; Pierre Chauvin; Gwenn Menvielle; Emmanuelle Cadot; Virginie Ringa; Laurent Rigal
Journal:  BMC Fam Pract       Date:  2019-08-15       Impact factor: 2.497

10.  Is there an association between spatial accessibility of outpatient care and utilization? Analysis of gynecological and general care.

Authors:  Ulrike Stentzel; Jeanette Bahr; Daniel Fredrich; Jens Piegsa; Wolfgang Hoffmann; Neeltje van den Berg
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2018-05-03       Impact factor: 2.655

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.