Literature DB >> 25456014

Neighborhood effects in a behavioral randomized controlled trial.

Sandi L Pruitt1, Tammy Leonard2, James Murdoch3, Amy Hughes4, Amy McQueen5, Samir Gupta6.   

Abstract

Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of interventions intended to modify health behaviors may be influenced by neighborhood effects which can impede unbiased estimation of intervention effects. Examining a RCT designed to increase colorectal cancer (CRC) screening (N=5628), we found statistically significant neighborhood effects: average CRC test use among neighboring study participants was significantly and positively associated with individual patient's CRC test use. This potentially important spatially-varying covariate has not previously been considered in a RCT. Our results suggest that future RCTs of health behavior interventions should assess potential social interactions between participants, which may cause intervention arm contamination and may bias effect size estimation.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cancer screening; Neighborhood; Peer relationships; Randomized controlled trial; Spatial autocorrelation

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25456014      PMCID: PMC4845650          DOI: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2014.10.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Place        ISSN: 1353-8292            Impact factor:   4.078


  26 in total

1.  Causal inference and the relevance of social epidemiology.

Authors:  J Michael Oakes
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 4.634

Review 2.  The (mis)estimation of neighborhood effects: causal inference for a practicable social epidemiology.

Authors:  J Michael Oakes
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 4.634

3.  Commentary: Understanding social network analysis.

Authors:  Peter Sainsbury
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2008-12-04

4.  Homophily and Contagion Are Generically Confounded in Observational Social Network Studies.

Authors:  Cosma Rohilla Shalizi; Andrew C Thomas
Journal:  Sociol Methods Res       Date:  2011-05

5.  Effect of language on colorectal cancer screening among Latinos and non-Latinos.

Authors:  Joseph A Diaz; Mary B Roberts; Roberta E Goldman; Sherrie Weitzen; Charles B Eaton
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 4.254

6.  Is obesity contagious? Social networks vs. environmental factors in the obesity epidemic.

Authors:  Ethan Cohen-Cole; Jason M Fletcher
Journal:  J Health Econ       Date:  2008-05-09       Impact factor: 3.883

7.  Physicians, clinics, and neighborhoods: multiple levels of influence on colorectal cancer screening.

Authors:  Sandi L Pruitt; Tammy Leonard; Song Zhang; Mario Schootman; Ethan A Halm; Samir Gupta
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2014-04-14       Impact factor: 4.254

8.  Community contextual predictors of endoscopic colorectal cancer screening in the USA: spatial multilevel regression analysis.

Authors:  Lee R Mobley; Tzy-Mey Kuo; Matthew Urato; Sujha Subramanian
Journal:  Int J Health Geogr       Date:  2010-09-03       Impact factor: 3.918

9.  Understanding non-compliance to colorectal cancer screening: a case control study, nested in a randomised trial [ISRCTN83029072].

Authors:  Paolo Giorgi Rossi; Antonio Federici; Francesco Bartolozzi; Sara Farchi; Piero Borgia; Gabriella Guasticchi
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2005-12-22       Impact factor: 3.295

10.  Neighborhood socioeconomic status and use of colonoscopy in an insured population--a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Chyke A Doubeni; Guruprasad D Jambaulikar; Hassan Fouayzi; Scott B Robinson; Margaret J Gunter; Terry S Field; Douglas W Roblin; Robert H Fletcher
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-05-02       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  6 in total

Review 1.  Weight Loss Pharmacotherapy: Brief Summary of the Clinical Literature and Comments on Racial Differences.

Authors:  Brent M Egan; Kellee White
Journal:  Ethn Dis       Date:  2015-11-05       Impact factor: 1.847

2.  Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial Evaluating Mobile Text Messaging to Promote Retention and Adherence to Antiretroviral Therapy for People Living With HIV in Burkina Faso.

Authors:  Natascha Wagner; Denis Ouedraogo; Luis Artavia-Mora; Arjun Bedi; Boundia Alexandre Thiombiano
Journal:  JMIR Res Protoc       Date:  2016-08-17

3.  Comprehensive geriatric intervention in community-dwelling older adults: a cluster-randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Yuya Watanabe; Yosuke Yamada; Tsukasa Yoshida; Keiichi Yokoyama; Motoko Miyake; Emi Yamagata; Minoru Yamada; Yasuko Yoshinaka; Misaka Kimura
Journal:  J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle       Date:  2020-01-29       Impact factor: 12.910

4.  Design and baseline characteristics of the PerfectFit study: a multicenter cluster-randomized trial of a lifestyle intervention in employees with increased cardiovascular risk.

Authors:  Tessa A Kouwenhoven-Pasmooij; Bosiljka Djikanovic; Suzan J W Robroek; Pieter Helmhout; Alex Burdorf; M G Myriam Hunink
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2015-07-28       Impact factor: 3.295

5.  Disentangling individual and neighborhood differences in the intention to quit smoking in Asian American male smokers.

Authors:  Priyanka Vyas; Janice Y Tsoh; Ginny Gildengorin; Susan L Stewart; Edgar Yu; Alice Guan; Amber Pham; Nancy J Burke; Steven J McPhee
Journal:  Prev Med Rep       Date:  2020-02-11

6.  Impact and Feasibility of Information Technology to Support Adolescent Well-Being and Mental Health at School: A Quasi-Experimental Study.

Authors:  Minna Anttila; Tella Lantta; Milla Ylitalo; Marjo Kurki; Marko Kuuskorpi; Maritta Välimäki
Journal:  J Multidiscip Healthc       Date:  2021-07-07
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.