| Literature DB >> 24727413 |
Jun Chen1, Yange Qu1, Dongyue Wang1, Pei Peng1, Hao Cai1, Ying Gao1, Zhipeng Chen1, Baochang Cai2.
Abstract
The aim of the study was to investigate the possibility of improving the therapeutic efficacy of the total alkaloid fraction (TAF) extracted from processed nux vomica by reducing the strychnine contents. Most strychnine was removed from TAF to obtain the modified total alkaloid fraction (MTAF). The toxicity and pharmacokinetics of TAF and MTAF were further investigated and compared besides their antitumor, analgesic and anti-inflammatory activities. The results showed that the ratios of brucine to strychnine were 1:2.05 and 2.2:1 for TAF and MTAF, respectively, and the toxicity of TAF was about 3.17-fold higher than that of MTAF. Compared to brucine alone, the elimination of brucine was found to be inhibited by other alkaloids in TAF or MTAF except strychnine. Significantly increased pharmacological activities when administered by the oral route were obtained with MTAF in comparison to TAF and nux vomica powder (NVP). In summary, MTAF might replace NVP and TAF in the clinical application of Chinese medicine to obtain much higher efficacy.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2014 PMID: 24727413 PMCID: PMC6270886 DOI: 10.3390/molecules19044395
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.411
Figure 1Chemical structures of strychnine and brucine.
Figure 2HPLC chromatographs of standard solution (A), TAF (B) and MTAF (C). Peaks: 1. Brucine; 2. Strychnine; 3. Brucine N-oxide.
Toxic values of orally administrated TAF and MTAF in mice.
| Formulations | LD95 (mg/kg) | LD50 (mg/kg) | LD5 (mg/kg) |
|---|---|---|---|
| TAF | 10.47 (7.20–15.21) | 4.76 (3.92–5.78) | 2.17 (1.48–3.17) |
| MTAF | 35.13 (23.26–53.05) | 15.10 (12.35–18.47) | 6.49 (4.29–9.84) |
Note: 95% confidence interval in the brackets.
Figure 3Plasma concentration versus time profile of brucine after oral administration of brucine, TAF and MTAF at the brucine dose of 1 mg/kg to rats (n = 6).
Pharmacokinetic parameters of brucine after oral administration of brucine, TAF and MTAF at the brucine dose of 1 mg/kg to rats (n = 6).
| Parameters | Brucine | TAF | MTAF |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUC0–t (ng/mL·h) | 555.30 ± 25.48 | 1092.43 ± 90.12 *** | 1210.44 ± 66.71 ***,△ |
| AUC0–∞ (ng/mL·h) | 766.75 ± 21.77 | 1294.53 ± 111.40 *** | 1449.95 ± 109.11 ***,△ |
| MRT0–∞ (h) | 4.60 ± 0.23 | 5.31 ± 1.20 | 5.46 ± 0.61 ** |
| T1/2 (h) | 3.61 ± 0.13 | 3.95 ± 0.91 | 4.22 ± 0.52 * |
| CL/F (L/h/kg) | 1.32 ± 0.06 | 0.78 ± 0.06 *** | 0.66 ± 0.06 ***,△ |
| V/F (L/kg) | 6.80 ± 0.36 | 4.39 ± 0.85 *** | 4.20 ± 0.41 *** |
| Tmax (h) | 0.17 | 0.25 | 0.25 |
| Cmax (ng/mL) | 512.72 ± 13.34 | 511.82 ± 36.65 | 537.07 ± 53.73 |
Notes: * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001 vs. the brucine group, △ p < 0.05 vs. the TAF group.
IC50 values (μg/mL) of TAF or MTAF on the cancer cell growth after 72 h treatment.
| Cancer cell lines | TAF | MTAF | Cisplatin |
|---|---|---|---|
| HepG2 | 70.71 | 38.58 | <1 |
| MGC-803 | 77.62 | 40.20 | <1 |
| A549 | 80.02 | 76.52 | <1 |
| A2780 | 32.79 | 15.67 | 1.45 |
| LoVo | 14.89 | 6.57 | <1 |
Results of the acetic acid-induced writhing test after oral administration of different formulations to mice (n = 10).
| Experimental groups | Dose (mg/kg) | Writhing times | PP (%) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Negative | - | 36.89 ± 2.95 | - |
| Aspirin | 15 | 21.59 ± 3.78 ** | 41.47 |
| NVP | 25 | 29.07 ± 3.49 * | 21.20 |
| TAF | 1.0 | 28.11 ± 3.28 ** | 23.80 |
| MTAF | 1.0 | 24.06 ± 2.72 *** | 34.78 |
| MTAF | 0.5 | 27.88 ± 2.54 ** | 24.42 |
| MTAF | 0.25 | 33.07 ± 3.53 | 10.36 |
* p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001 vs. the negative group.
Results of anti-inflammatory activity of different formulations on xylene-induced ear edema of mice (n = 10).
| Experimental groups | Dose (mg/kg) | Extent of edema (mg) | PIE (%) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Negative | - | 7.73 ± 1.34 | — |
| Dexamethasone | 15 | 3.23 ± 1.27 ** | 58.21 |
| NVP | 25 | 5.58 ± 2.67 * | 27.81 |
| TAF | 1.0 | 5.96 ± 1.83 * | 22.90 |
| MTAF | 1.0 | 4.52 ± 1.87 ** | 41.53 |
| MTAF | 0.5 | 5.09 ± 1.99 ** | 34.15 |
| MTAF | 0.25 | 6.32 ± 2.18 | 18.24 |
* p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01,*** p < 0.001 vs. the negative group.
Effects of different formulations on acetic acid-induced vascular permeability in mice (n = 10).
| Experimental groups | Dose (mg/kg) | Amount of dye leakage (μg) | Inhibition (%) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Negative | - | 72.05 ± 7.00 | - |
| Indomethacin | 50 | 51.67 ± 9.58 *** | 28.29 |
| NVP | 25 | 63.44 ± 10.31 | 11.95 |
| TAF | 1.0 | 59.58 ± 8.69 ** | 17.31 |
| MTAF | 1.0 | 55.05 ± 10.33 ** | 23.59 |
| MTAF | 0.5 | 59.49 ± 18.99 * | 17.43 |
| MTAF | 0.25 | 67.10 ± 14.55 | 6.87 |
Compared to the negative group, * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01.