Michelle A Albert1, John Z Ayanian2, Treacy S Silbaugh2, Ann Lovett2, Fred Resnic2, Aryana Jacobs2, Sharon-Lise T Normand2. 1. From the Divisions of Cardiovascular Medicine and Preventive Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital/Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA (M.A.A., F.R.); Division of General Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA (J.Z.A.); Department of Health Care Policy, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA (J.Z.A., A.L., S.T.N.); Lahey Clinic, Lahey, MA (F.R.); Department of Biostatistics, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, MA (S.T.N.); Institute of Healthcare Policy, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor (J.Z.A.); and Division of Cardiovascular Medicine at Howard University and Howard University Hospital, Washington, DC (A.J.). michelle.albert@howard.edu. 2. From the Divisions of Cardiovascular Medicine and Preventive Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital/Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA (M.A.A., F.R.); Division of General Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA (J.Z.A.); Department of Health Care Policy, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA (J.Z.A., A.L., S.T.N.); Lahey Clinic, Lahey, MA (F.R.); Department of Biostatistics, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, MA (S.T.N.); Institute of Healthcare Policy, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor (J.Z.A.); and Division of Cardiovascular Medicine at Howard University and Howard University Hospital, Washington, DC (A.J.).
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Insured adults receive invasive cardiovascular procedures more frequently than uninsured adults. We examined the impact of healthcare reform in Massachusetts on use of coronary revascularization procedures and in-hospital and 1-year mortality by race/ethnicity, education, and sex. METHODS AND RESULTS: Using hospital claims data, we compared differences in coronary revascularization rates (coronary artery bypass grafting or percutaneous coronary intervention) and in-hospital mortality by race/ethnicity, education, and sex among Massachusetts residents aged 21 to 64 years hospitalized with a principal discharge diagnosis of ischemic heart disease before (November 1, 2004, to July 31, 2006) and after (December 1, 2006, to September 30, 2008) reform; 1-year mortality was calculated for those undergoing revascularization. Adjusted logistic regression assessed 24 216 discharges before reform and 20 721 discharges after reform. Blacks had 30% lower odds of receiving coronary revascularization than whites in the prereform period. Compared with whites in the postreform period, blacks (odds ratio=0.73; 95% confidence interval, 0.63-0.84) and Hispanics (odds ratio= 0.84; 95% confidence interval, 0.74-0.97) were less likely and Asians (odds ratio=1.29; 95% confidence interval, 1.01-1.65) were more likely to receive coronary revascularization. Patients living in more educated communities, men, and persons with private insurance were more likely to receive coronary revascularization before and after reform. Compared with the prereform period, the adjusted odds of in-hospital mortality were higher in patients living in less-educated communities in the postreform period. No differences in 1-year mortality by race/ethnicity, education, or sex for revascularized patients were observed before or after reform. CONCLUSIONS: Reducing insurance barriers to receipt of coronary revascularization procedures has not yet eliminated preexisting demographic and educational disparities in access to these procedures.
BACKGROUND: Insured adults receive invasive cardiovascular procedures more frequently than uninsured adults. We examined the impact of healthcare reform in Massachusetts on use of coronary revascularization procedures and in-hospital and 1-year mortality by race/ethnicity, education, and sex. METHODS AND RESULTS: Using hospital claims data, we compared differences in coronary revascularization rates (coronary artery bypass grafting or percutaneous coronary intervention) and in-hospital mortality by race/ethnicity, education, and sex among Massachusetts residents aged 21 to 64 years hospitalized with a principal discharge diagnosis of ischemic heart disease before (November 1, 2004, to July 31, 2006) and after (December 1, 2006, to September 30, 2008) reform; 1-year mortality was calculated for those undergoing revascularization. Adjusted logistic regression assessed 24 216 discharges before reform and 20 721 discharges after reform. Blacks had 30% lower odds of receiving coronary revascularization than whites in the prereform period. Compared with whites in the postreform period, blacks (odds ratio=0.73; 95% confidence interval, 0.63-0.84) and Hispanics (odds ratio= 0.84; 95% confidence interval, 0.74-0.97) were less likely and Asians (odds ratio=1.29; 95% confidence interval, 1.01-1.65) were more likely to receive coronary revascularization. Patients living in more educated communities, men, and persons with private insurance were more likely to receive coronary revascularization before and after reform. Compared with the prereform period, the adjusted odds of in-hospital mortality were higher in patients living in less-educated communities in the postreform period. No differences in 1-year mortality by race/ethnicity, education, or sex for revascularized patients were observed before or after reform. CONCLUSIONS: Reducing insurance barriers to receipt of coronary revascularization procedures has not yet eliminated preexisting demographic and educational disparities in access to these procedures.
Authors: David M Shahian; Treacy Silverstein; Ann F Lovett; Robert E Wolf; Sharon-Lise T Normand Journal: Circulation Date: 2007-03-12 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Cheryl R Clark; Jane Soukup; Usha Govindarajulu; Heather E Riden; Dora A Tovar; Paula A Johnson Journal: Health Aff (Millwood) Date: 2011-02 Impact factor: 6.301
Authors: R M Steingart; M Packer; P Hamm; M E Coglianese; B Gersh; E M Geltman; J Sollano; S Katz; L Moyé; L L Basta Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 1991-07-25 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Alain G Bertoni; Kelly L Goonan; Denise E Bonds; Melicia C Whitt; David C Goff; Frederick L Brancati Journal: J Natl Med Assoc Date: 2005-03 Impact factor: 1.798
Authors: Nicole Lurie; Allen Fremont; Arvind K Jain; Stephanie L Taylor; Rebecca McLaughlin; Eric Peterson; B Waine Kong; T Bruce Ferguson Journal: Circulation Date: 2005-03-15 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: K A Schulman; J A Berlin; W Harless; J F Kerner; S Sistrunk; B J Gersh; R Dubé; C K Taleghani; J E Burke; S Williams; J M Eisenberg; J J Escarce Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 1999-02-25 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Edward L Hannan; Ye Zhong; Gary Walford; Alice K Jacobs; Ferdinand J Venditti; Nicholas J Stamato; David R Holmes; Samin Sharma; Foster Gesten; Spencer B King Journal: J Interv Cardiol Date: 2013-08-20 Impact factor: 2.279
Authors: Andrew P Loehrer; Alexander T Hawkins; Hugh G Auchincloss; Zirui Song; Matthew M Hutter; Virendra I Patel Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2016-04 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: H M K Ghomrawi; A I Mushlin; R Kang; S Banerjee; J A Singh; L Sharma; C Flink; M Nevitt; T Neogi; D L Riddle Journal: J Bone Joint Surg Am Date: 2020-03-18 Impact factor: 6.558
Authors: Andi Shahu; Jeph Herrin; Sanket S Dhruva; Nihar R Desai; Barry R Davis; Harlan M Krumholz; Erica S Spatz Journal: J Am Heart Assoc Date: 2019-07-31 Impact factor: 5.501