Literature DB >> 24726972

Paced QT interval is a better predictor of mortality than the intrinsic QT interval: long-term follow-up study.

Jung Myung Lee1, Ajit H Janardhan2, Ki-Woon Kang3, Boyoung Joung1, Hui-Nam Pak1, Srikanth Sundaram2, William C Choe2, Moon-Hyoung Lee1, Hye Jin Hwang4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Prolongation of the corrected QT (QTc) interval on 12-lead electrocardiogram is related to total mortality and sudden cardiac death. The value of the paced QTc interval in predicting mortality has not been investigated.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the relationship between the paced QTc interval and mortality.
METHODS: Of 1440 patients who underwent pacemaker implantation from January 1990 to March 2010, 766 had a recorded intrinsic and ventricular paced rhythm and were included in this study. The intrinsic and paced QTc intervals were measured on 12-lead electrocardiogram before and 1-month after implantation.
RESULTS: During a mean follow-up period of 7 ± 5 years, 189 (24.4%) patients died, of which 63 (8.1%) were cardiac deaths. Compared with patients in the first tertile of the paced QTc interval (<484 ms), patients in the third tertile (>511 ms) were significantly more likely to die (19% vs 29%; P < .05). A comparison of the third and first tertiles of the QTc interval showed that a prolonged paced QTc interval was a significant independent predictor of all-cause mortality (adjusted hazard ratio 2.08; 95% confidence interval 1.44-3.01; P < .001) and cardiac mortality (adjusted hazard ratio 2.53; 95% confidence interval 1.29-4.95; P = .007) and a better predictor than was a prolonged intrinsic QTc interval. When treated as a continuous variable, a prolonged paced QTc interval predicted increased total mortality and cardiac mortality.
CONCLUSION: The paced QTc interval appears to be a more useful marker in predicting bad prognosis than does the intrinsic QTc interval in patients with indications for a permanent pacemaker.
Copyright © 2014 Heart Rhythm Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Intrinsic QTc interval; Mortality; Paced QTc interval; Permanent pacemaker; Prolonged QTc interval; Ventricular pacing

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24726972     DOI: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2014.04.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Heart Rhythm        ISSN: 1547-5271            Impact factor:   6.343


  4 in total

1.  QT interval variations and mortality risk: is there any relationship?

Authors:  Ciprian Rezuş; Victor Dan Moga; Anca Ouatu; Mariana Floria
Journal:  Anatol J Cardiol       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 1.596

2.  Editorial: Trapped pacemaker lead extraction: Necessity, challenge, and beyond.

Authors:  Toru Maruyama; Keita Odashiro
Journal:  J Cardiol Cases       Date:  2015-12-29

3.  Changes of repolarization parameters after left bundle branch area pacing and the association with echocardiographic response in heart failure patients.

Authors:  Yao Li; Wenzhao Lu; Qingyun Hu; Chendi Cheng; Jinxuan Lin; Yu'an Zhou; Ruohan Chen; Yan Dai; Keping Chen; Shu Zhang
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2022-08-04       Impact factor: 4.755

4.  Left bundle branch potential predicts better electrical synchrony in bradycardia patients receiving left bundle branch pacing.

Authors:  Jingjuan Huang; Lina Guo; Weiwei Zhang; Ruogu Li; Ben He
Journal:  BMC Cardiovasc Disord       Date:  2022-08-19       Impact factor: 2.174

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.