Theresa Holmgren1, Birgitta Oberg2, Lars Adolfsson3, Hanna Björnsson Hallgren3, Kajsa Johansson2. 1. Department of Medical and Health Sciences, Division of Physiotherapy, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden. Electronic address: theresa.holmgren@liu.se. 2. Department of Medical and Health Sciences, Division of Physiotherapy, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden. 3. Department of Orthopedics, University Hospital of Linköping; Department of Experimental Medicine, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine the minimal important change (MIC) of improvement in the Constant-Murley score in patients with long-standing subacromial pain and in subgroups of patients with subacromial pain with and without rotator cuff ruptures. METHOD: The MIC was estimated by the anchor-based MIC distribution method, which integrates an anchor- and distribution-based approach: the optimal cutoff point of the receiver operating characteristic curve (MICROC) and the 95% limit cutoff point (MIC95% limit). The study population consisted of 93 patients included in a randomized clinical trial evaluating the effect of a specific exercise strategy. RESULTS: The MICROC was found at a mean change of 17 points in the Constant-Murley score, which corresponds to a sensitivity of 91% and a specificity of 79%. The MIC95% limit was found at a mean change of 24 points. In the subgroup analysis, the MICROC was found at a mean change of 19 points and the MIC95% limit at 18 points in patients with an intact rotator cuff. In patients with rotator cuff ruptures, the MICROC was found at a mean change of 15 points and the MIC95% limit at 30 points. CONCLUSION: The Constant-Murley score is able to detect the MIC in individual patients with long-standing subacromial pain when the rotator cuff is intact. The estimated MIC values could be used as an indication for relevant changes in the Constant-Murley score in clinical practice and guide the clinician in how to interpret the results of specific treatments.
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine the minimal important change (MIC) of improvement in the Constant-Murley score in patients with long-standing subacromial pain and in subgroups of patients with subacromial pain with and without rotator cuff ruptures. METHOD: The MIC was estimated by the anchor-based MIC distribution method, which integrates an anchor- and distribution-based approach: the optimal cutoff point of the receiver operating characteristic curve (MICROC) and the 95% limit cutoff point (MIC95% limit). The study population consisted of 93 patients included in a randomized clinical trial evaluating the effect of a specific exercise strategy. RESULTS: The MICROC was found at a mean change of 17 points in the Constant-Murley score, which corresponds to a sensitivity of 91% and a specificity of 79%. The MIC95% limit was found at a mean change of 24 points. In the subgroup analysis, the MICROC was found at a mean change of 19 points and the MIC95% limit at 18 points in patients with an intact rotator cuff. In patients with rotator cuff ruptures, the MICROC was found at a mean change of 15 points and the MIC95% limit at 30 points. CONCLUSION: The Constant-Murley score is able to detect the MIC in individual patients with long-standing subacromial pain when the rotator cuff is intact. The estimated MIC values could be used as an indication for relevant changes in the Constant-Murley score in clinical practice and guide the clinician in how to interpret the results of specific treatments.
Authors: David Kovacevic; Robert J Suriani; Brian M Grawe; Edward H Yian; Mohit N Gilotra; S Ashfaq Hasan; Umasuthan Srikumaran; Samer S Hasan; Frances Cuomo; Robert T Burks; Andrew G Green; Wesley M Nottage; Sai Theja; Hafiz F Kassam; Maarouf A Saad; Miguel A Ramirez; Rodney J Stanley; Matthew D Williams; Vidushan Nadarajah; Alexis C Konja; Jason L Koh; Andrew S Rokito; Charles M Jobin; William N Levine; Christopher C Schmidt Journal: J Shoulder Elbow Surg Date: 2020-08-04 Impact factor: 3.019
Authors: Daniel E Axelrod; Seper Ekhtiari; Anthony Bozzo; Mohit Bhandari; Herman Johal Journal: Clin Orthop Relat Res Date: 2020-02 Impact factor: 4.755
Authors: Rodrigo Py Gonçalves Barreto; Marcus Levi Lopes Barbosa; Marcos Alencar Abaide Balbinotti; Fernando Carlos Mothes; Luís Henrique Telles da Rosa; Marcelo Faria Silva Journal: Rev Bras Ortop Date: 2016-10-26
Authors: Hanna C Björnsson Hallgren; Lars E Adolfsson; Kajsa Johansson; Birgitta Öberg; Anna Peterson; Theresa M Holmgren Journal: Acta Orthop Date: 2017-08-16 Impact factor: 3.717
Authors: Jan K G Louwerens; Michel P J van den Bekerom; Barend J van Royen; Denise Eygendaal; Arthur van Noort; Inger N Sierevelt Journal: JSES Int Date: 2020-06-06