Alessandro Schneebeli1, Michele Egloff2, Amelia Giampietro3, Ron Clijsen4, Marco Barbero2. 1. Department of Health Sciences, University of Applied Sciences and Arts of Southern Switzerland, SUPSI, Switzerland. Electronic address: alessandro.schneebeli@supsi.ch. 2. Department of Health Sciences, University of Applied Sciences and Arts of Southern Switzerland, SUPSI, Switzerland. 3. Department of Radiology, St. Anna Clinic, Sorengo, Switzerland. 4. Department of Health Sciences, University of Applied Sciences and Arts of Southern Switzerland, SUPSI, Landquart, Switzerland.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To examine intra- and interrater reliability of thickness and cross-sectional area (CSA) measurements of the supraspinatus muscle using rehabilitative ultrasound imaging (RUSI). METHODS: Two physical therapists acquired b-mode images of the supraspinatus muscles in twenty-five healthy subjects. Thickness and CSA were measured. Intra- and interrater reliability were examined. RESULTS: Intrarater reliability for thickness was high, (ICC1.1 0.91) for rater 1 and (ICC1.1 0.92) for rater 2. Intrarater reliability for CSA was also high, (ICC1.1 0.90) for rater 1 and (ICC1.1 0.85) for rater 2. Interrater reliability for the thickness was high, (ICC3.1 0.86). For CSA, interrater reliability was moderate, (ICC3.1 0.70). CONCLUSION: Supraspinatus muscle thickness and CSA can be reliably measured by physical therapists in healthy subjects. These findings confirm that RUSI has an interesting potential for physiotherapy clinical practice, especially to assess morphometric changes in skeletal muscles. Further research is needed in subjects with shoulder disorders.
OBJECTIVE: To examine intra- and interrater reliability of thickness and cross-sectional area (CSA) measurements of the supraspinatus muscle using rehabilitative ultrasound imaging (RUSI). METHODS: Two physical therapists acquired b-mode images of the supraspinatus muscles in twenty-five healthy subjects. Thickness and CSA were measured. Intra- and interrater reliability were examined. RESULTS: Intrarater reliability for thickness was high, (ICC1.1 0.91) for rater 1 and (ICC1.1 0.92) for rater 2. Intrarater reliability for CSA was also high, (ICC1.1 0.90) for rater 1 and (ICC1.1 0.85) for rater 2. Interrater reliability for the thickness was high, (ICC3.1 0.86). For CSA, interrater reliability was moderate, (ICC3.1 0.70). CONCLUSION: Supraspinatus muscle thickness and CSA can be reliably measured by physical therapists in healthy subjects. These findings confirm that RUSI has an interesting potential for physiotherapy clinical practice, especially to assess morphometric changes in skeletal muscles. Further research is needed in subjects with shoulder disorders.
Authors: Lauren Adams; Nicolas Pace; Austin Heo; Iain Hunter; A Wayne Johnson; Ulrike H Mitchell Journal: J Sports Sci Med Date: 2022-02-15 Impact factor: 2.988