A series of phosphine-ligated palladium precatalysts based on N-methyl- and N-phenyl-2-aminobiphenyl have been developed. Substitution at the nitrogen center prevents the presence of traces of aminobiphenyls that contain a free -NH2 group from contaminating cross-coupling products. These precatalysts produce N-substituted carbazoles upon activation, which cannot consume starting materials. These precatalysts were efficiently generated from 2-aminobiphenyl with minimal purification and found to be highly effective in Suzuki-Miyaura and C-N cross-coupling reactions.
A series of phosphine-ligated n class="Chemical">palladium precatalysts based on N-methyl- and N-phenyl-2-aminobiphenyl have been developed. Substitution at the nitrogen center prevents the presence of traces of aminobiphenyls that contain a free -NH2 group from contaminating cross-coupling products. These precatalysts produce N-substituted carbazoles upon activation, which cannot consume starting materials. These precatalysts were efficiently generated from 2-aminobiphenyl with minimal purification and found to be highly effective in Suzuki-Miyaura and C-N cross-coupling reactions.
We recently
reported palladium
precatalysts based on a ligated n class="Chemical">2-aminobiphenylpalladium methanesulfonate
palladacycle (1, Scheme 1).[1] Precatalyst 1 activates through
the deprotonation of the palladium-bound amine to give a Pd–amido
complex which then reductively eliminates to form carbazole, a methanesulfonate
salt, and LPd(0). Precatalysts of type 1 can accommodate
a variety of ligands and are applicable to numerous palladium-catalyzed
transformations.[2]
Scheme 1
Palladium Methanesulfonate
Precatalysts and Their Generic Activation
Despite the advantages of 1, a few drawbacks
limit
their utility in some applications, including (1) the carbazole byproduct
generated through the activation of 1 can be n class="Chemical">N-arylated, consuming valuable starting materials or potentially
complicating work-up/purification of the desired product,[1b] and (2) there is some concern regarding the
presence of trace amounts of residual NH2-aminobiphenyls
in pharmaceutical samples due to potential health risks.[3]N-Alkyl and N-aryl analogues of 1 would overcome these concerns and
provide a useful alternative to 1.
Preparation of N-Methyl- and N-Phenyl-2-aminobiphenyl
Derivatives
(i)
nBuLi, THF, 0 °C, 30
min; (ii) MeI, 0 °C to rt, 30 min, quant conversion.1 mol % 1·L1,
PhCl, NaOtBu, dioxane, 100 °C, 30 min, 99%.N-Substituted 2-aminobiphenyls could be readily prepared on a 30
mmol scale via N-methylation and N-arylation as shown in Scheme 2. The unpurified products[4] from these reactions can be directly used to prepare the corresponding
palladacycles. Treatment of N-methyl-2-aminobiphenyl, 2, and N-phenyl-2-aminobiphenyl, 3, with methanesulfonic acid followed by heating the resulting salt
solution with Pd(OAc)2 provided the dimeric palladacycles 4 and 5. These procedures were amenable to scale
up, providing the desired palladium dimers in excellent yields at
a 30 mmol scale (Scheme 3).
Scheme 2
Preparation of N-Methyl- and N-Phenyl-2-aminobiphenyl
Derivatives
(i)
nBuLi, THF, 0 °C, 30
min; (ii) MeI, 0 °C to rt, 30 min, quant conversion.
Preparation of N-Substituted
μ-OMs Palladium Dimers
These were subsequently treated with phosphines at room
temperature
inn class="Chemical">dichloromethane to provide the N-substituted precatalysts (Scheme 4). Precatalysts that incorporated a variety of ligands
could be prepared as shown in Scheme 3. In
contrast, however, to what we observed with 1, we were
unable to make precatalysts containing the largest of our ligands:
attempts to incorporate tBuBrettPhos, RockPhos, and AdBrettPhos were
unsuccessful.[5] Additionally, while we could
prepare 6f from (±)-BINAP, we were unable to obtain
the corresponding N-phenyl analogue, 7f.[6]
Scheme 4
Preparation of N-Substituted Palladium
Methanesulfonate Precatalysts
The solid-state structures of 6a and 7a were determined by single-crystal X-ray crystallography
(Figure 1). Both possess a tetracoordinated
Pd(II) center
with a slightly distorted square planar geometry. The n class="Chemical">phosphine is
bound to the palladium center cis to the Pd–C
bond. Additionally the methanesulfonate anion is directly bound to
the palladium center. This is similar to what was previously observed
for 1 (L = XPhos).
Figure 1
Crystallographically determined X-ray
structures of 5a and 6a (thermal ellipsoid
plot at 50% probability,
hydrogen atoms are omitted for clarity).
Crystallographically determined X-ray
structures of 5a and 6a (thermal ellipsoid
plot at 50% probability,
hydrogen atoms are omitted for clarity).To evaluate the reactivity of precatalysts 6 and 7, we first examined their efficacy in promoting
the Suzuki–Miyaura
coupling of n class="Chemical">aryl halides with arylboronic acids that are prone to
rapid protodeboronation under standard cross-coupling reaction conditions.
As previously described, the rapid generation of a highly active LPd(0)
is essential for success of these reactions.[7] These reactions allowed us to test whether 6 and 7 activate rapidly at room temperature. As shown in Scheme 5, both 6a and 7a were
highly effective precatalysts in the coupling of (hetero)aryl halides
and unstable boronic acids, providing the arylated products in uniformly
good yields.
Scheme 5
Suzuki–Miyaura Coupling of Unstable Boronic
Acids with Precatalysts 6a and 7a
General conditions: ArX (1 mmol),
Ar’B(OH)2 (1.5 mmol), 6a or 7a (2 mol %), 0.5 M K3PO4 (aq) (4 mL), THF (2
mL), rt, 30 min, average of two isolated yields.
Suzuki–Miyaura Coupling of Unstable Boronic
Acids with Precatalysts 6a and 7a
General conditions: ArX (1 mmol),
Ar’B(OH)2 (1.5 mmol), 6a or 7a (2 mol %), 0.5 M K3PO4 (aq) (4 mL), THF (2
mL), rt, 30 min, average of two isolated yields.We also evaluated precatalysts of type 6 and 7 in C–N cross-coupling reactions. They were found
to be effective in the arylation of primary amines, secondary amines,
as well as primary amides (Scheme 6). The precatalyst
was able to be employed at low catalyst loadings (0.01 mol %) for
the arylation of aniline with 4-chloro- and 4-iodoanisole.
Scheme 6
N-Arylation of Amines with Precatalysts 6 and 7
In conclusion, we
have developed a series of precatalysts based
on the N-methyl- and n class="Chemical">N-phenyl-2-aminobiphenylpalladium
methanesulfonate scaffold. By utilizing N-substituted
2-aminobiphenyls, the chance of the trace contamination of reaction
products with NH2-aminobiphenyls is eliminated. Additionally,
the N-substituted carbazole that results during precatalyst
activation cannot be further arylated, preventing the waste of the
aryl halide substrate. We believe that these precatalysts, like 1, will find many applications in palladium-catalyzed cross-coupling
chemistry in both academia and industry.
Experimental
Section
General Information
General Reagent Information
THF
and n class="Chemical">toluene were purchased
in solvent-delivery kegs and vigorously purged with argon for 2 h.
The solvents were further purified by passing it under argon pressure
through two packed columns of neutral alumina (for THF) or through
neutral alumina and copper(II) oxide (for toluene). Anhydrous tribasicpotassium phosphate and sodium tert-butoxide were
purchased from commercial suppliers. These bases were stored in a
nitrogen-filled glovebox and removed in small quantities. They were
stored on the bench in a desiccator for up to 2 weeks. Pd(OAc)2 and all ligands were acquired from commercial suppliers.
All other reagents were purchased from commercial suppliers and used
as received. Aqueous 0.5 M K3PO4 solution was
prepared by dissolving K3PO4 (1.06 g, 5 mmol)
in deionized water (19 mL), and the solution was degassed by performing
three sets of evacuation and argon refill cycles under sonication.
Flash chromatography was performed with 230–400 mesh silica
gel.
General Analytical Information
All
compounds (starting
materials and products) were characterized by 1Hn class="Chemical">NMR, 13CNMR, 31PNMR (when applicable), 19FNMR (when applicable), and IR spectroscopy, melting point (when
applicable), and elemental analysis. The 1H, 13C, 31P, and 19FNMR spectra can be found in
the Supporting Information. 1H, 13C, 31P, and 19FNMR were recorded
on 300, 400, or 500 MHz spectrometers. The spectra were calibrated
according to residual solvent peaks (CDCl3: 7.26 ppm for 1HNMR and 77.0 ppm for 13CNMR; CD2Cl2: 5.32 ppm for 1HNMR and 53.84 ppm for 13CNMR; CD3OD: 3.31 for 1HNMR and 49.00 for 13CNMR), an external reference (H3PO4: 0 ppm for 31P; CFCl3: 0 ppm for 19F), or an internal reference (CF3Ph: −63.7 ppm
for 19F). The 13C and 31PNMR spectra
were obtained with 1H decoupling, and the 19FNMR spectra were obtained without 1H decoupling. The
following abbreviations were used to explain the multiplicities: s
= singlet, d = doublet, t = triplet, q = quartet, m = multiplet, br
= broad, app = apparent. Reactions were monitored by GC and thin-layer
chromatography (TLC) carried out on 0.25 mm glass-backed silica gel
plates using UV light as a visualizing agent.
A flame-dried 300 mL round-bottomed flask
equipped with
a magnetic stir bar was charged with 2-aminobiphenyl and capped with
a rubber septum. The flask was evacuated and backfilled with n class="Chemical">argon,
followed by the addition of THF (100 mL). The mixture was cooled to
0 °C in an ice bath. At 0 °C, nBuLi (2.5 M in hexanes, 12.6
mL, 31.5 mmol, 1.05 equiv) was added slowly. After the addition of
nBuLi was complete the bright yellow reaction mixture was stirred
for 1 h at 0 °C. Then iodomethane (1.89 mL, 30.3 mmol, 1.01 equiv)
was added slowly, at which time the color faded to a dull yellow.
The mixture was stirred for an additional 30 min at rt. Saturated
NaHCO3 (aq) (25 mL) and water (25 mL) were added, and the
aqueous layer was extracted with diethyl ether (3 × 50 mL). The
combined organic layers were dried over MgSO4 and concentrated
under vacuum to provide the title compound as a yellow oil as a 95:5
mixture of mono-/dimethylated product, as determined by gas chromatography
and 1HNMR. The crude mixture was used directly in the
next step without further purification. Yield: 5.45 g, 99%. 1HNMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): δ 7.49–7.42 (m, 4H),
7.40–7.34 (m, 1H), 7.30 (ddd, J = 8.1, 7.4,
1.7 Hz, 1H), 7.12 (dd, J = 7.4, 1.6 Hz, 1H), 6.80
(td, J = 7.4, 1.1 Hz, 1H), 6.72 (dd, J = 8.2, 1.0 Hz, 1H), 3.98 (s, 1H), 2.82 (s, 3H) ppm. 13CNMR (126 MHz, CDCl3): δ 146.4, 139.7, 130.2, 129.6,
129.1, 129.0, 127.8, 127.4, 117.0, 110.0, 31.0 ppm. IR (neat, cm–1): 1613, 1603, 1509, 1490, 1435, 1284, 1008, 770,
746, 701, 615.
Step 2: Palladium Methanesulfonate Dimer
(4)
A 200 mL round-bottomed flask equipped with
a magnetic stir bar
was charged with N-methyl-2-aminobiphenyl (5.52 g,
30.0 mmol, 1.00 equiv, 95:5 mono-/dimethylated) and n class="Chemical">THF (60 mL). With
stirring, methanesulfonic acid (1.84 mL, 28.5 mmol, 0.95 equiv (1
equiv relative to monomethylated amine)) was added slowly and the
reaction mixture stirred for 15 min at room temperature. Palladium
acetate (6.38 g, 28.5 mmol, 0.95 equiv) was added in one portion and
rinsed off the walls of the flask with additional THF (15 mL). The
flask was capped with a rubber septum, and the deep red slurry was
stirred at 50 °C for 45 min. After the mixture was cooled to
room temperature, the dark yellow solution was filtered through a
plug of cotton to remove traces of palladium black and ∼95%
of the solvent was removed with the aid of a rotary evaporator. Diethyl
ether (150 mL) was added to the flask, and the mixture was sonicated
to precipitate the product. The solid was isolated via vacuum filtration
and dried under vacuum overnight to provide the title compound as
a tan solid. Yield: 10.2 g, 93%. 1HNMR (500 MHz, CD2Cl2 + 10 μL pyridine-d5): δ 7.70 (d, J = 7.7 Hz, 1H), 7.66–7.56
(m, 1H), 7.52–7.47 (m, 1H), 7.44 (d, J = 7.7
Hz, 1H), 7.36 (t, J = 7.6 Hz, 1H), 7.28 (t, J = 7.7 Hz, 1H), 7.15 (t, J = 7.4 Hz, 1H),
6.94–6.84 (m, 1H), 6.50 (d, J = 7.7 Hz, 1H),
2.70 (d, J = 5.6 Hz, 3H), 2.61 (s, 3H) ppm. 13CNMR (126 MHz, CD3OD): δ 142.0, 140.7,
133.4, 128. 9, 128.5, 127.2, 126.5, 125.2, 39.0 ppm. IR (neat, cm–1): 3205, 1230, 1136, 1118, 1026, 735, 727 714, 589.
A 100 mL oven-dried round-bottomed flask
equipped with
a magnetic stir bar was charged with 2-aminobiphenyl (5.07 g, 30.0
mmol, 1.00 equiv), n class="Chemical">sodium tert-butoxide (3.07 g,
32.0 mmol, 1.07 equiv), and XPhos precatalyst 1·L1 (306 mg, 0.30 mmol, 1 mol %). The flask was capped with a rubber
septum and subsequently evacuated and backfilled with argon (this
procedure was repeated one additional time). Chlorobenzene (3.04 mL,
30.0 mmol, 1.00 equiv) was then added by syringe, followed by dioxane
(30 mL). The reaction mixture was stirred at 100 °C for 30 min.
It was then cooled to room temperature, diluted with ethyl acetate
(50 mL), and filtered through a plug of silica gel layered on top
of Celite, eluting the mixture with additional ethyl acetate. The
mixture was concentrated with the aid of a rotary evaporator, and
the product was obtained as a dark yellow oil, containing traces of N,N-diphenyl-2-aminobiphenyl and 9-phenylcarbazole.
It was used for the next step without further purification. 1HNMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): δ 7.53–7.46 (m, 4H),
7.46–7.38 (m, 2H), 7.34–7.27 (m, 4H), 7.12–7.02
(m, 3H), 6.97 (tt, J = 7.4, 1.1 Hz, 1H), 5.66 (bs,
1H) ppm. 13CNMR (126 MHz, CDCl3): δ 144.1,
140.9, 139.7, 132.2, 131.6, 130.1, 130.1, 129.6, 129.0, 128.2, 121.8,
121.8, 118.9, 118.2. IR (neat, cm–1): 1611, 1500,
1479, 1434, 1008, 749, 721, 702.
Step 2: Palladium Methanesulfonate
Dimer (5)
A 300 mL round-bottomed flask equipped
with a magnetic stir bar
was charged with N-phenyl-2-aminobiphenyl (7.35 g,
30.0 mmol, 1.00 equiv) and n class="Chemical">THF (50 mL). Methanesulfonic acid (1.95
mL, 30.0 mmol, 1.00 equiv) was added slowly with vigorous stirring.
After the reaction mixture was stirred for 15 min, palladium acetate
(6.72 g, 30.0 mmol, 1.00 equiv) was added to the flask in one portion
and rinsed off the walls of the flask with additional THF (25 mL).
The flask was capped with a rubber septum, and the deep red slurry
was stirred at 50 °C for 45 min. Over the course of the reaction
the deep red color dissipated and a tan slurry formed. The reaction
mixture was cooled to room temperature and poured into an Erlenmeyer
flask containing pentane (75 mL) and diethyl ether (75 mL). The solid
was isolated via vacuum filtration and dried under vacuum overnight
to afford the title compound as a tan powder. Yield: 12.1 g, 87%. 1HNMR (500 MHz, CD3CN): δ 10.47 (s, 1H),
7.83–7.79 (m, 1H), 7.52 (ddd, J = 7.8, 6.9,
1.9 Hz, 1H), 7.47–7.39 (m, 3H), 7.20–7.13 (m, 2H), 7.13–7.09
(m, 2H), 7.09–7.03 (m, 2H), 7.00 (dd, J =
7.8, 1.2 Hz, 1H), 6.89 (ddd, J = 7.9, 7.2, 1.6 Hz,
1H), 2.75 (s, 3H). 13CNMR (126 MHz, CD3CN):
δ 146.4, 142.4, 140.6, 137.5, 136.8, 136.5, 130.0, 129.8, 129.5,
129.3, 127.8, 127.1, 127.1, 126.7, 123.8, 122.1, 40.3 ppm. IR (neat,
cm–1): 3115, 1493, 1218, 1130, 1025, 762, 735, 716,
606.
XPhos Precatalyst 6a: Representative
Procedure
A 24 mL screw-top test tube equipped with a stir
bar was charged
with 4 (384 mg, 0.50 mmol, 0.50 equiv) XPhos (476 mg,
1.00 mmol, 1.00 equiv). n class="Chemical">Dichloromethane (5 mL) was added, and the
reaction mixture was stirred at room temperature for 1 h. The solvent
was removed with the aid of rotary evaporation. Pentane (25 mL) was
added to the residue to precipitate the precatalyst, which was then
isolated via vacuum filtration and dried under vacuum overnight to
provide the title compound as a tan solid. Yield: 730 mg, 85%. 1HNMR (500 MHz, CD3OD): δ 7.97 (ddd, J = 9.2, 4.9, 2.9 Hz, 1H), 7.65 (dd, J =
7.8, 1.7 Hz, 2H), 7.63–7.57 (m, 3H), 7.41–7.23 (m, 5H),
7.16–7.10 (m, 1H), 7.04–6.94 (m, 2H), 3.39 (h, J = 6.9 Hz, 1H), 2.94 (hept, J = 6.8 Hz,
1H), 2.69 (s, 3H), 2.61–2.49 (m, 1H), 2.37 (qt, J = 12.4, 3.1 Hz, 1H), 2.29 (d, J = 10.9 Hz, 1H),
2.09 (dd, J = 6.0, 2.6 Hz, 4H), 1.98 (ddd, J = 13.4, 9.5, 5.0 Hz, 2H), 1.94–1.75 (m, 5H), 1.56
(dd, J = 6.9, 2.5 Hz, 7H), 1.51–1.23 (m, 7H),
1.22–1.06 (m, 6H), 0.94–0.83 (m, 4H), 0.67 (d, J = 6.8 Hz, 2H), 0.15 (m, 1H) ppm. 13CNMR (126
MHz, CD3OD): δ 157.5, 156.3, 151.5, 145.3, 145.2,
144.4, 135.6, 134.1, 133.1, 132.9, 131.8, 130.5, 130.4, 129.5, 129.1,
129.1, 128.6, 128.5, 128.2, 128.0, 127.8, 127.2, 126.9, 125.9, 124.6,
123.4, 122.1, 41.9, 40.8, 40.7, 39.7, 39.6, 38.5, 37.4, 35.8, 35.6,
34.5, 33.9, 33.2, 32.9, 32.4, 31.4, 30.3, 30.2, 28.4, 28.0, 26. 8,
26.6, 25.6, 25.1, 24.6, 24.1, 23.2, 22.8 ppm (observed complexity
due to C–P splitting). 31PNMR (121 MHz, CD3OD) δ 39.49 ppm. IR (neat, cm–1):
2924, 1462, 1420, 1144, 1020, 1003, 876, 766, 738.
Following
general procedure A, a mixture of 4 (384 mg, 0.50 mmol,
0.50 equiv), (±)-BINAP (622 mg, 1.00 mmol, 1.00 equiv), and dichloromethane
(10 mL) was stirred at room temperature for 1 h. After removal of
the solvent, the residue was triturated with pentane to provide the
title compound as a yellow solid. Yield: 903 mg, 90%. 1HNMR (500 MHz, CD3OD): δ 7.99–7.91 (m, 2H),
7.84–7.68 (m, 7H), 7.59–7.50 (m, 3H), 7.47–7.38
(m, 2H), 7.38–7.11 (m, 10H), 7.10–7.00 (m, 3H), 7.00–6.86
(m, 4H), 6.84–6.78 (m, 2H), 6.75 (dd, J =
7.8, 1.1 Hz, 1H), 6.71–6.64 (m, 2H), 6.52–6.47 (m, 1H),
6.39 (tdd, J = 7.6, 6.7, 2.6, 1.3 Hz, 1H), 6.35–6.31
(m, 1H), 2.68 (s, 3H), 2.28 (d, J = 2.7 Hz, 3H) ppm. 13CNMR (126 MHz, CD2Cl2): δ 164.86,
164.00, 151.61, 141.05, 141.04, 140.80, 140.30, 138.83, 138.49, 138.41,
138.15, 135.77, 135.68, 135.07, 135.02, 134.97, 134.90, 134.71, 134.69,
134.56, 134.54, 134.06, 133.98, 133.73, 133.66, 133.08, 133.06, 131.75,
131.73, 131.58, 131.08, 131.01, 130.86, 130.24, 130.18, 130.00, 129.96,
129.88, 129.12, 129.04, 128.89, 128.87, 128.70, 128.57, 128.55, 128.26,
128.17, 127.90, 127.68, 127.60, 127.58, 127.54, 127.49, 127.45, 127.25,
126.67, 126.44, 126.38, 126.31, 123.73, 123.39, 122.52, 122.10, 121.51,
41.37, 40.11 ppm (observed complexity due to C–P splitting). 31PNMR (121 MHz, CD3OD): δ 36.35 (d, J = 42.5 Hz), 35.18 (d, J = 43.6 Hz), 13.92
(d, J = 42.4 Hz), 12.42 (d, J =
43.7 Hz). IR (neat, cm–1): 3202, 1225, 1193, 1037,
758, 734, 695, 670.
Suzuki–Miyaura Coupling: General Procedure
A
screw-top test tube equipped with a magnetic stir bar was charged
with 6a or 7a (0.02 mmol, 2 mol %), arylboronic
acid (1.50 mmol, 1.50 equiv), and n class="Chemical">aryl halide (if solid, 1.00 mmol,
1.00 equiv), and the tube was sealed with a Teflon screw-cap septum.
The vessel was evacuated and backfilled with argon (this process was
repeated a total of three times), and the aryl halide, if liquid (1.00
mmol, 1.00 equiv) was added at this time. Anhydrous THF (2 mL) and
0.5 M aq K3PO4 solution (4 mL) were then added
via syringe, and the reaction mixture was stirred for 30 min at room
temperature. The reaction mixture was diluted with EtOAc (10 mL) and
H2O (10 mL), and the layers were separated. The aqueous
layer was extracted with additional EtOAc (3 × 5 mL). The combined
organic layers were dried over Na2SO4 and filtered
through a pad of Celite. The filtrate was concentrated, and the resulting
residue was purified by flash chromatography using a Biotage Isolera
Four system with a SNAP 25 g cartridge to afford the desired product.
Arylation
of Amines. Representative Procedure: 4-Methoxydiphenylamine
(X = Cl)
A screw-top test tube equipped with a magnetic stir
bar was charged with NaOtBu (115 mg, 1.20 mmol, 1.20 equiv), and the
tube was sealed with a Teflon screw-cap septum. The tube was evacuated
and backfilled with n class="Chemical">argon (this procedure was performed a total of
three times), after which 4-chloroaniline (123 μL, 1.00 mmol,
1.00 equiv), aniline (110 μL, 1.20 mmol, 1.20 equiv), precatalyst
solution (0.01 M in THF, 10 μL, 0.01 mol %) and dioxane (1 mL)
were added by syringe. The reaction mixture was heated at 110 °C
for 24 h, after which it was cooled to room temperature and diluted
with ethyl acetate. The crude reaction mixture was then filtered through
a pad of Celite, concentrated with the aid of rotary evaporation,
and purified by column chromatography, eluting with 10% ethyl acetate
in hexanes to provide the title compound as an off-white solid. Yield
with 6b: 191 mg, 96%. Yield with 7b: 179
mg, 90%. Mp = 101–102 °C. 1HNMR (500 MHz,
chloroform-d): δ 7.32–7.18 (m, 2H),
7.14–7.05 (m, 2H), 6.99–6.91 (m, 2H), 6.91–6.80
(m, 3H), 5.51 (s, 1H), 3.82 (s, 3H) ppm. 13CNMR (126 MHz,
CDCl3): δ 156.0, 145.9, 136.5, 130.1, 122.9, 120.3,
116.4, 115.4, 56.3 ppm. IR (neat, cm–1): 3386, 1595,
1500, 1489, 1443, 1297, 1247, 1236, 1032, 749, 694.
4-Methoxydiphenylamine
(X = I)
ArI (1 mmol), PhNH2 (1.4 mmol), NaOtBu
(1.4 mmol) precatalyst solution (0.01
M in THF, 10 μL, 0.01 mol %), PhMe (1 mL), 5 min. Off-white
solid. Yield with 6b: 187 mg, 94%. Yield with 7b: 193 mg, 97%. Characterization data consistent with above case where
X=Cl.
Authors: Xiaoqiang Shen; Gavin O Jones; Donald A Watson; Brijesh Bhayana; Stephen L Buchwald Journal: J Am Chem Soc Date: 2010-08-18 Impact factor: 15.419
Authors: Yike Zou; Xiangqin Li; Yun Yang; Simon Berritt; Jason Melvin; Stephen Gonzales; Matthew Spafford; Amos B Smith Journal: J Am Chem Soc Date: 2018-07-20 Impact factor: 15.419
Authors: Nathaniel H Park; Ekaterina V Vinogradova; David S Surry; Stephen L Buchwald Journal: Angew Chem Int Ed Engl Date: 2015-06-01 Impact factor: 15.336