Carolyn Stalgaitis1, Sara Nelson Glick1. 1. Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, The George Washington University, Washington, District of Columbia, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: An increasing number of studies have used the diary method, which provides quantitative event-level data about sexual encounters. Diaries are an attractive tool for sexual behaviour research, yet little is known about the range of uses, methodological issues and best practices associated with this technology. OBJECTIVES: To conduct a systematic review of the literature regarding the use of web-based diaries in sexual risk behaviour studies. DESIGN: Systematic review. DATA SOURCES: Five bibliographical databases, supplemented by references from previous reviews. METHODS: Eligible studies were published in English before August 2013, used the internet to transmit data from collection device to study staff, and measured behaviours affecting HIV or sexually transmitted infection transmission risk. The primary author conducted an initial screen to eliminate irrelevant articles. Both authors conducted full-text reviews to determine final articles. We abstracted data on diary methodology, validity and reactivity (behaviour change caused by diary completion). RESULTS: Twenty-three articles representing 15 studies were identified. Most diaries were collected daily for 1 month via websites, and completion was generally high (>80%). Compensation varied by study and was not associated with completion. Studies comparing diary with retrospective survey data demonstrated evidence of over-reporting on retrospective tools, except for the least frequent behaviours. Most studies that assessed reactivity as a result of diary completion demonstrated some change in behaviour associated with frequent monitoring. CONCLUSIONS: Web-based diaries are an effective means of studying sexual risk behaviour. More uniform reporting and further research on the extent of reactivity are needed. Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions.
BACKGROUND: An increasing number of studies have used the diary method, which provides quantitative event-level data about sexual encounters. Diaries are an attractive tool for sexual behaviour research, yet little is known about the range of uses, methodological issues and best practices associated with this technology. OBJECTIVES: To conduct a systematic review of the literature regarding the use of web-based diaries in sexual risk behaviour studies. DESIGN: Systematic review. DATA SOURCES: Five bibliographical databases, supplemented by references from previous reviews. METHODS: Eligible studies were published in English before August 2013, used the internet to transmit data from collection device to study staff, and measured behaviours affecting HIV or sexually transmitted infection transmission risk. The primary author conducted an initial screen to eliminate irrelevant articles. Both authors conducted full-text reviews to determine final articles. We abstracted data on diary methodology, validity and reactivity (behaviour change caused by diary completion). RESULTS: Twenty-three articles representing 15 studies were identified. Most diaries were collected daily for 1 month via websites, and completion was generally high (>80%). Compensation varied by study and was not associated with completion. Studies comparing diary with retrospective survey data demonstrated evidence of over-reporting on retrospective tools, except for the least frequent behaviours. Most studies that assessed reactivity as a result of diary completion demonstrated some change in behaviour associated with frequent monitoring. CONCLUSIONS: Web-based diaries are an effective means of studying sexual risk behaviour. More uniform reporting and further research on the extent of reactivity are needed. Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions.
Entities:
Keywords:
EPIDEMIOLOGY (GENERAL); INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY; SEXUAL BEHAVIOUR; SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS
Authors: Zoe R Edelstein; Stephen M Schwartz; Stephen Hawes; James P Hughes; Qinghua Feng; Michael E Stern; Sandra O'Reilly; Shu-Kuang Lee; Long Fu Xi; Laura A Koutsky Journal: Sex Transm Dis Date: 2012-11 Impact factor: 2.830
Authors: Megan S C Lim; Rachel Sacks-Davis; Campbell K Aitken; Jane S Hocking; Margaret E Hellard Journal: J Epidemiol Community Health Date: 2009-09-18 Impact factor: 3.710
Authors: Joseph B Bavaro; Linda Drolette; David M Koelle; Jennifer Almekinder; Terri Warren; Stephen Tyring; Anna Wald Journal: Sex Transm Dis Date: 2008-04 Impact factor: 2.830
Authors: Hannah R Crowder; Sarah E Brown; Christina A Stennett; Elizabeth Johnston; Amelia M Wnorowski; Katrina S Mark; Rebecca M Brotman Journal: Sex Transm Dis Date: 2019-08 Impact factor: 2.830
Authors: Michael E Newcomb; Gregory Swann; Ryne Estabrook; Marya Corden; Mark Begale; Alan Ashbeck; David Mohr; Brian Mustanski Journal: Assessment Date: 2016-09-01
Authors: Albert Y Liu; Nicole D Laborde; Kenneth Coleman; Eric Vittinghoff; Rafael Gonzalez; Gretchen Wilde; Annie L Thorne; Ed Ikeguchi; Laura Shafner; Lauren Sunshine; Ariane van der Straten; Aaron J Siegler; Susan Buchbinder Journal: AIDS Behav Date: 2020-10-12
Authors: Krystal Cantos; Molly F Franke; Katherine Tassiopoulos; Paige L Williams; Anna-Barbara Moscicki; Georg R Seage Journal: AIDS Behav Date: 2021-04-24