| Literature DB >> 24722629 |
Neslihan Taş1, Emmanuel Prestat1, Jack W McFarland2, Kimberley P Wickland3, Rob Knight4, Asmeret Asefaw Berhe5, Torre Jorgenson6, Mark P Waldrop2, Janet K Jansson7.
Abstract
Permafrost soils are large reservoirs of potentially labile carbon (C). Understanding the dynamics of C release from these soils requires us to account for the impact of wildfires, which are increasing in frequency as the climate changes. Boreal wildfires contribute to global emission of greenhouse gases (GHG-Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2014 PMID: 24722629 PMCID: PMC4139727 DOI: 10.1038/ismej.2014.36
Source DB: PubMed Journal: ISME J ISSN: 1751-7362 Impact factor: 10.302
Figure 1(a) Photos showing the intact and thawed permafrost soils of Nome Creek. Tick marks correspond to 10 cm intervals. (b) CO2 fluxes in the headspace of 8-week long laboratory incubation of samples from control and burned locations. Values are means±s.e. (c) Changes in the extracellular enzyme activities between control and burned locations.
Soil geochemistry
| 0–10 | 3.9±0.2 | 89.8±0.4 | 42.2±1.6 | 0.6±0.1 | 72.6±15 | 3.5±0.8 | 5.3±0.6 | 43.1±33.0 | 20.4±13.2 | 0.8±0.5 | 24.4±7.4 | 0.3±0.3 |
| 10–20 | 3.9±0.5 | 92.1±1.6 | 42.6±0.8 | 0.6±0.2 | 68.5±21 | 2.6±0.3 | 4.7±0.9 | 35.4±11.6 | 7.4±9.4 | 0.3±0.4 | 22.0±5.5 | 0.2±0.1 |
| 20–30 | 3.9±0.1 | 86.9±4.3 | 40.8±0.9 | 1.3±0.4 | 32.4±15 | 1.8±1.0 | 4.6±0.4 | 18.7±1.0 | 1.5±0.6 | 0.1±0.0 | 19.0±4.6 | 0.1±0.0 |
| 30–40 | 3.8±0.7 | 56.8±28.8 | 21.1±19.4 | 0.9±0.8 | 24.4±3.1 | 0.5±0.4 | 4.8±0.2 | 21.9±2.0 | 3.3±2.6 | 0.2±0.1 | 21.3±3.3 | 0.1±0.0 |
| 40–50 | 4.9±0.7 | 46.3±18.2 | 8.7±2.8 | 0.3±0.1 | 27.2±1.4 | 0.2±0.1 | 5.6±0.3 | 38.1±7.4 | 3.6±4.0 | 0.2±0.2 | 21.7±4.1 | 0.1±0.0 |
| 50–60 | 4.7±0.6 | 62.0±8.3 | 7.2±4.3 | 0.3±0.2 | 27.6±7.1 | 0.3±0.0 | 5.0±1.0 | 19.4±0.3 | 1.4±0.7 | 0.1±0.0 | 20.6±4.9 | 0.1±0.0 |
| 60–70 | 4.9±0.6 | 55.3±6.5 | 7.3±5.8 | 0.3±0.2 | 28.2±1.8 | 0.2±0.0 | 4.7±0.0 | 22.5±4.9 | 2.6±1.1 | 0.1±0.0 | 22.7±1.3 | 0.1±0.0 |
| 70–80 | 4.7±0.4 | 31.8±27.6 | 3.1±3.1 | 0.1±0.1 | 22.7±6.3 | 0.2±0.1 | 5.3±0.2 | 20.6±3.6 | 2.5±2.5 | 0.1±0.1 | 23.7±12 | 0.1±0.1 |
| 80–90 | 5.1±0.4 | 46.7±10.3 | 4.8±6.2 | 0.2±0.2 | 30.4±8.6 | 0.2±0.1 | 5.0±0.1 | 26.3±16.3 | 3.4±3.7 | 0.2±0.1 | 23.8±6.6 | 0.1±0.0 |
| 90–100 | 5.7±0.1 | 49.1±12.7 | 4.1±2.9 | 0.2±0.1 | 24.8±6.9 | 0.2±0.2 | 5.3±0.4 | 14.2±9.9 | 0.9±0.9 | 0.0±0.0 | 16.8±8.8 | 0.1±0.0 |
Abbreviations: C, carbon; DOC, dissolved organic carbon; N, nitrogen.
Figure 216S rRNA gene sequencing with HiSeq2000 reveal the differences in prokaryotic diversity of samples from control and fire-impacted locations. (a) Communities clustered using principal coordinates analysis of the weighted UniFrac distance matrix. Each point corresponds to a sample colored in red/orange (○) for fire-impacted locations and in blue (◊) for the control locations. Lighter colors present the mineral soil depths. The percentage of variation explained by the plotted principal coordinates is indicated on the axes. (b) Contribution depth, fire and soil geochemistry on observed β-diversity was calculated via variation partitioning and represented as a Venn diagram. (c) Significant contributions of soil geochemistry to observed differences in prokaryotic diversity was tested using ANOVA.
Figure 3(a) Distribution of phylogenetic groups in the control and burned locations in each soil depth. (b) Pearson's correlation tests were used to detect significant positive or negative correlations (yellow shading) of each phylum to the fire event or soil depth.
Figure 4(a) Heatmap of intersections in Nome Creek metagenomes. Similarity matrix resulting from the comparison of 11 samples using Compareads (khmer=33, t=2, 5.7E7 reads). Gray levels correspond to similarity levels. The three main groups, in blue, turquoise-blue and red, correspond, respectively, to control surface layer (S), control middle (M) and permafrost (D) and all layers from fire-impacted locations. Legend shows the fraction of similarity between the comparisons. (b) Between-class analysis, which visualizes results from PCA and clustering of the KO annotations from 12 metagenomes. The between-class analysis finds the principal components based on the center of gravity of each group as a result every symbol represent two replicate metagenomes. Two principal components are plotted using the ade4 package in R where (◊) surface, (Δ) middle and (○) permafrost (deep soil) layers. Blue color indicates control samples, whereas red indicates fire-impacted samples.
Figure 5Heat maps indicating differences in relative abundances of functional genes involved in carbon and nitrogen cycle in the Nome Creek metagenomes. Impact of the fire and sampling depth on the observed variation of the relative gene abundances was tested ANOVA analysis, where significant (P<0.05) factors are represented within parentheses.