Murry W Wynes1, Lynette M Sholl, Manfred Dietel, Ed Schuuring, Ming S Tsao, Yasushi Yatabe, Raymond R Tubbs, Fred R Hirsch. 1. *Department of Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, University of Colorado, Aurora, Colorado; †Department of Pathology Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts; ‡Institute of Pathology, Charité University Hospital Berlin, Germany; §Department of Pathology and Medical Biology, University of Groningen, University Medical Centre Groningen, The Netherlands; ‖Princess Margaret Hospital, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada; ¶Department of Pathology and Molecular Diagnostics, Aichi Cancer Center, Kanokoden, Chikusa-ku, Nagoya, Japan; #Pathology and Laboratory Medicine Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio; ** Department of Pathology, University of Colorado, Aurora, Colorado; and ††University of Colorado Comprehensive Cancer Center, Aurora, Colorado.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: The goal of personalized medicine is to treat patients with a therapy predicted to be efficacious based on the molecular characteristics of the tumor, thereby sparing the patient futile or toxic therapy. Anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) inhibitors are effective against ALK-positive non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) tumors, but to date the only approved companion diagnostic is a break-apart fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) assay. Immunohistochemistry (IHC) is a clinically applicable cost-effective test that is sensitive and specific for ALK protein expression. The purpose of this study was to assemble an international team of expert pathologists to evaluate a new automated standardized ALK IHC assay. METHODS: Archival NSCLC tumor specimens (n =103) previously tested for ALK rearrangement by FISH were provided by the international collaborators. These specimens were stained by IHC with the anti-ALK (D5F3) primary antibody combined with OptiView DAB IHC detection and OptiView amplification (Ventana Medical Systems, Inc., Tucson, AZ). Specimens were scored binarily as positive if strong granular cytoplasmic brown staining was present in tumor cells. IHC results were compared with the FISH results and interevaluator comparisons made. RESULTS: Overall for the 100 evaluable cases the ALK IHC assay was highly sensitive (90%), specific (95%), and accurate relative (93%) to the ALK FISH results. Similar results were observed using a majority score. IHC negativity was scored by seven of seven and six of seven evaluators on three and two FISH-positive cases, respectively. IHC positivity was scored on two FISH-negative cases by seven of seven readers. There was agreement among seven of seven and six of seven readers on 88% and 96% of the cases before review, respectively, and after review there was agreement among seven of seven and six of seven on 95% and 97% of the cases, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: On the basis of expert evaluation the ALK IHC test is sensitive, specific, and accurate, and a majority score of multiple readers does not improve these results over an individual reader's score. Excellent inter-reader agreement was observed. These data support the algorithmic use of ALK IHC in the evaluation of NSCLC.
INTRODUCTION: The goal of personalized medicine is to treat patients with a therapy predicted to be efficacious based on the molecular characteristics of the tumor, thereby sparing the patient futile or toxic therapy. Anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) inhibitors are effective against ALK-positive non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) tumors, but to date the only approved companion diagnostic is a break-apart fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) assay. Immunohistochemistry (IHC) is a clinically applicable cost-effective test that is sensitive and specific for ALK protein expression. The purpose of this study was to assemble an international team of expert pathologists to evaluate a new automated standardized ALK IHC assay. METHODS: Archival NSCLC tumor specimens (n =103) previously tested for ALK rearrangement by FISH were provided by the international collaborators. These specimens were stained by IHC with the anti-ALK (D5F3) primary antibody combined with OptiView DAB IHC detection and OptiView amplification (Ventana Medical Systems, Inc., Tucson, AZ). Specimens were scored binarily as positive if strong granular cytoplasmic brown staining was present in tumor cells. IHC results were compared with the FISH results and interevaluator comparisons made. RESULTS: Overall for the 100 evaluable cases the ALK IHC assay was highly sensitive (90%), specific (95%), and accurate relative (93%) to the ALK FISH results. Similar results were observed using a majority score. IHC negativity was scored by seven of seven and six of seven evaluators on three and two FISH-positive cases, respectively. IHC positivity was scored on two FISH-negative cases by seven of seven readers. There was agreement among seven of seven and six of seven readers on 88% and 96% of the cases before review, respectively, and after review there was agreement among seven of seven and six of seven on 95% and 97% of the cases, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: On the basis of expert evaluation the ALK IHC test is sensitive, specific, and accurate, and a majority score of multiple readers does not improve these results over an individual reader's score. Excellent inter-reader agreement was observed. These data support the algorithmic use of ALK IHC in the evaluation of NSCLC.
Authors: Rafael Rosell; Enric Carcereny; Radj Gervais; Alain Vergnenegre; Bartomeu Massuti; Enriqueta Felip; Ramon Palmero; Ramon Garcia-Gomez; Cinta Pallares; Jose Miguel Sanchez; Rut Porta; Manuel Cobo; Pilar Garrido; Flavia Longo; Teresa Moran; Amelia Insa; Filippo De Marinis; Romain Corre; Isabel Bover; Alfonso Illiano; Eric Dansin; Javier de Castro; Michele Milella; Noemi Reguart; Giuseppe Altavilla; Ulpiano Jimenez; Mariano Provencio; Miguel Angel Moreno; Josefa Terrasa; Jose Muñoz-Langa; Javier Valdivia; Dolores Isla; Manuel Domine; Olivier Molinier; Julien Mazieres; Nathalie Baize; Rosario Garcia-Campelo; Gilles Robinet; Delvys Rodriguez-Abreu; Guillermo Lopez-Vivanco; Vittorio Gebbia; Lioba Ferrera-Delgado; Pierre Bombaron; Reyes Bernabe; Alessandra Bearz; Angel Artal; Enrico Cortesi; Christian Rolfo; Maria Sanchez-Ronco; Ana Drozdowskyj; Cristina Queralt; Itziar de Aguirre; Jose Luis Ramirez; Jose Javier Sanchez; Miguel Angel Molina; Miquel Taron; Luis Paz-Ares Journal: Lancet Oncol Date: 2012-01-26 Impact factor: 41.316
Authors: Ka-Fai To; Joanna H M Tong; King S F Yeung; Raymond W M Lung; Peggy P Y Law; Shuk Ling Chau; Wei Kang; Carol Y K Tong; Chit Chow; Anthony W H Chan; Linda K S Leung; Tony S K Mok Journal: J Thorac Oncol Date: 2013-07 Impact factor: 15.609
Authors: Nir Peled; Gary Palmer; Fred R Hirsch; Murry W Wynes; Maya Ilouze; Marileila Varella-Garcia; Lior Soussan-Gutman; Geoff A Otto; Philip J Stephens; Jeffrey S Ross; Maureen T Cronin; Doron Lipson; Vincent A Miller Journal: J Thorac Oncol Date: 2012-09 Impact factor: 15.609
Authors: Eugen C Minca; Bryce P Portier; Zhen Wang; Christopher Lanigan; Carol F Farver; Yan Feng; Patrick C Ma; Valeria A Arrossi; Nathan A Pennell; Raymond R Tubbs Journal: J Mol Diagn Date: 2013-03-13 Impact factor: 5.568
Authors: Alice T Shaw; Dong-Wan Kim; Kazuhiko Nakagawa; Takashi Seto; Lucio Crinó; Myung-Ju Ahn; Tommaso De Pas; Benjamin Besse; Benjamin J Solomon; Fiona Blackhall; Yi-Long Wu; Michael Thomas; Kenneth J O'Byrne; Denis Moro-Sibilot; D Ross Camidge; Tony Mok; Vera Hirsh; Gregory J Riely; Shrividya Iyer; Vanessa Tassell; Anna Polli; Keith D Wilner; Pasi A Jänne Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2013-06-01 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: D Ross Camidge; Yung-Jue Bang; Eunice L Kwak; A John Iafrate; Marileila Varella-Garcia; Stephen B Fox; Gregory J Riely; Benjamin Solomon; Sai-Hong I Ou; Dong-Wan Kim; Ravi Salgia; Panagiotis Fidias; Jeffrey A Engelman; Leena Gandhi; Pasi A Jänne; Daniel B Costa; Geoffrey I Shapiro; Patricia Lorusso; Katherine Ruffner; Patricia Stephenson; Yiyun Tang; Keith Wilner; Jeffrey W Clark; Alice T Shaw Journal: Lancet Oncol Date: 2012-09-04 Impact factor: 41.316
Authors: Diana Taheri; David J Zahavi; Maria Del Carmen Rodriguez; Abdelrazak Meliti; Neda Rezaee; Raluca Yonescu; Bernardo F P Ricardo; Shahaboddin Dolatkhah; Yi Ning; Justin A Bishop; George J Netto; Rajni Sharma Journal: Virchows Arch Date: 2016-06-06 Impact factor: 4.064
Authors: E Felip; Á Concha; J de Castro; J Gómez-Román; P Garrido; J Ramírez; D Isla; J Sanz; L Paz-Ares; F López-Ríos Journal: Clin Transl Oncol Date: 2014-10-29 Impact factor: 3.405
Authors: Christian Rolfo; Francesco Passiglia; Marta Castiglia; Luis E Raez; Paul Germonpre; Ignacio Gil-Bazo; Karen Zwaenepoel; Annemieke De Wilde; Giuseppe Bronte; Antonio Russo; Jan P Van Meerbeeck; Paul Van Schil; Patrick Pauwels Journal: Transl Lung Cancer Res Date: 2014-08
Authors: Francesco Facchinetti; Marcello Tiseo; Massimo Di Maio; Paolo Graziano; Emilio Bria; Giulio Rossi; Silvia Novello Journal: Transl Lung Cancer Res Date: 2016-06
Authors: M von Laffert; P Schirmacher; A Warth; W Weichert; R Büttner; R M Huber; J Wolf; F Griesinger; M Dietel; C Grohé Journal: Pathologe Date: 2016-03 Impact factor: 1.011