Literature DB >> 24720614

Searching for the optimal rate of medically necessary cesarean delivery.

Jiangfeng Ye1, Ana Pilar Betrán, Miguel Guerrero Vela, Joäo Paulo Souza, Jun Zhang.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Over the past three decades, the World Health Organization expert panel proposed cesarean delivery rate of 10-15 percent was used as a doctrine for an optimal rate of cesarean delivery despite the lack of concrete evidence. We set out to compile cesarean delivery rates, socioeconomic indicators, and health outcomes by countries in the last three decades to explore the optimal rates for medically necessary cesarean delivery.
METHODS: We selected 19 countries which have readily accessible cesarean delivery and low maternal and infant mortality, including countries in North and West Europe, North America, Australia, New Zealand, and Japan. Information on cesarean delivery rate, human development index (HDI), gross domestic products (GDP), maternal, neonatal, and infant mortality rates of each country in the past 30 years was collected from published reports. A two-level fractional polynomial model was used to model the association between cesarean rate and mortality rates.
RESULTS: Most of the countries have experienced sharp increases in cesarean delivery rates. Once cesarean delivery rate reached 10 percent, with adjustment for HDI and GDP, further increase in cesarean delivery rate had no impact on maternal, neonatal, and infant mortality rates.
CONCLUSIONS: Our findings corroborate the statement that a population-level cesarean section rate above 10-15 percent is hardly justified from the medical perspective.
© 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cesarean delivery; infant mortality; maternal mortality; neonatal mortality

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24720614     DOI: 10.1111/birt.12104

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Birth        ISSN: 0730-7659            Impact factor:   3.689


  65 in total

Review 1.  Interventions for women who have a caesarean birth to increase uptake and duration of breastfeeding: A systematic review.

Authors:  Sarah Beake; Debra Bick; Cath Narracott; Yan-Shing Chang
Journal:  Matern Child Nutr       Date:  2016-11-24       Impact factor: 3.092

2.  Perinatal and Obstetric Predictors for Autism Spectrum Disorder.

Authors:  Alfredo Perales-Marín; Isabel Peraita-Costa; Pablo Cervera-Boada; Montserrat Tellez de Meneses; Agustín Llopis-González; Salvador Marí-Bauset; María Morales-Suárez-Varela
Journal:  J Autism Dev Disord       Date:  2021-01-01

3.  Sources of influence on pregnant women's preferred mode of delivery in Buenos Aires, Argentina.

Authors:  Melissa Amyx; Luz Gibbons; Xu Xiong; Agustina Mazzoni; Fernando Althabe; Pierre Buekens; José M Belizán
Journal:  Birth       Date:  2017-08-29       Impact factor: 3.689

4.  Early neonatal mortality in twin pregnancy: Findings from 60 low- and middle-income countries.

Authors:  Saverio Bellizzi; Howard Sobel; Ana Pilar Betran; Marleen Temmerman
Journal:  J Glob Health       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 4.413

Review 5.  What Are Optimal Cesarean Section Rates in the U.S. and How Do We Get There? A Review of Evidence-Based Recommendations and Interventions.

Authors:  Diana Montoya-Williams; Dominick J Lemas; Lisa Spiryda; Keval Patel; Josef Neu; Tiffany L Carson
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2017-08-21       Impact factor: 2.681

6.  Cost-effectiveness analysis of a quality improvement program to reduce caesarean sections in Brazilian private hospitals: a case study.

Authors:  Rosa Maria Soares Madeira Domingues; Paula Mendes Luz; Barbara Vasques da Silva Ayres; Jacqueline Alves Torres; Maria do Carmo Leal
Journal:  Reprod Health       Date:  2021-05-08       Impact factor: 3.223

7.  Is a single dose of commonly used antibiotics effective in preventing maternal infection after cesarean section? A network meta-analysis.

Authors:  Ye Huang; Xinbo Yin; Xiaokai Wang; Fangyi Zhou; Xiaoxia Cao; Yeqiong Han; Shichang Sun
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-04-06       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  A systematic review on the effectiveness of implementation strategies to postpone elective caesarean sections to ≥ 39 + (0-6) weeks of gestation.

Authors:  Barbara Prediger; Anahieta Heu-Parvaresch; Stephanie Polus; Stefanie Bühn; Edmund A M Neugebauer; Pieper Dawid
Journal:  Syst Rev       Date:  2021-06-14

9.  Variation in hospital caesarean section rates for women with at least one previous caesarean section: a population based cohort study.

Authors:  Kathrin Schemann; Jillian A Patterson; Tanya A Nippita; Jane B Ford; Christine L Roberts
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2015-08-19       Impact factor: 3.007

Review 10.  What is the optimal rate of caesarean section at population level? A systematic review of ecologic studies.

Authors:  Ana Pilar Betran; Maria Regina Torloni; Jun Zhang; Jiangfeng Ye; Rafael Mikolajczyk; Catherine Deneux-Tharaux; Olufemi Taiwo Oladapo; João Paulo Souza; Özge Tunçalp; Joshua Peter Vogel; Ahmet Metin Gülmezoglu
Journal:  Reprod Health       Date:  2015-06-21       Impact factor: 3.223

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.