Yvonne Greve1, Felicitas Geier, Steffen Popp, Thomas Bertsch, Katrin Singler, Florian Meier, Alexander Smolarsky, Harald Mang, Christian Müller, Michael Christ. 1. Department of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Nuremberg Hospital, Institute for Clinical Chemistry, Laboratory Medicine, and Transfusion Medicine, Nuremberg Hospital, Master Program M. Sc. Medical Process Management, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nürnberg, Department of Geriatrics, Nuremberg Hospital, Chairholder at the Department of Health Economics, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nürnberg, Departement of Internal Medicine, Universitätsspital Basel, Switzerland.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The prognostic significance of near-syncope has not yet been adequately characterized. METHOD: We collected prospective data on a consecutive series of patients seen in an emergency department with syncope (brief loss of consciousness, usually with loss of muscle tone) or near-syncope (a feeling that syncope is about to occur, but without actual loss of consciousness or muscle tone). We report on the prevalence, etiology, and prognosis of such events (the SPEED study). Patients were followed up at 30 days and at 6 months after the event. RESULTS: From 17 July to 31 October 2011, 395 patients were seen in the emergency department for a chief complaint of syncope or near-syncope (3% of all emergency patients). Their median age was 70 years, and 55% were men. 62% had experienced syncope, and 38% near-syncope. The patients with near-syncope were younger than those with syncope ( 63 vs. 72 years, p < 0.014) and were also more commonly male (63% vs. 49%, p = 0.006). The two patient groups did not differ significantly with respect to their measured laboratory values and vital parameters or their accompanying medical conditions. Hospitalizations were more common for syncope than for near-syncope (86% vs. 70%, p < 0.001). Etiologies were similarly distributed in the two patient groups, with the main ones being reflex syncope, orthostatic syncope, cardiac syncope, and syncope of uncertain origin. In all, 123 of 379 patients (32%) had further undesired events within 30 days of the event. Multivariable logistic regression revealed that age, heart rate, and renal dysfunction were independent predictors of undesired events, while the type of syncope was not. CONCLUSION: Patients with near-syncope do not differ to any large extent from patients with syncope with respect to the features studied. The diagnostic evaluation should be similar for patients in the two groups.
BACKGROUND: The prognostic significance of near-syncope has not yet been adequately characterized. METHOD: We collected prospective data on a consecutive series of patients seen in an emergency department with syncope (brief loss of consciousness, usually with loss of muscle tone) or near-syncope (a feeling that syncope is about to occur, but without actual loss of consciousness or muscle tone). We report on the prevalence, etiology, and prognosis of such events (the SPEED study). Patients were followed up at 30 days and at 6 months after the event. RESULTS: From 17 July to 31 October 2011, 395 patients were seen in the emergency department for a chief complaint of syncope or near-syncope (3% of all emergency patients). Their median age was 70 years, and 55% were men. 62% had experienced syncope, and 38% near-syncope. The patients with near-syncope were younger than those with syncope ( 63 vs. 72 years, p < 0.014) and were also more commonly male (63% vs. 49%, p = 0.006). The two patient groups did not differ significantly with respect to their measured laboratory values and vital parameters or their accompanying medical conditions. Hospitalizations were more common for syncope than for near-syncope (86% vs. 70%, p < 0.001). Etiologies were similarly distributed in the two patient groups, with the main ones being reflex syncope, orthostatic syncope, cardiac syncope, and syncope of uncertain origin. In all, 123 of 379 patients (32%) had further undesired events within 30 days of the event. Multivariable logistic regression revealed that age, heart rate, and renal dysfunction were independent predictors of undesired events, while the type of syncope was not. CONCLUSION:Patients with near-syncope do not differ to any large extent from patients with syncope with respect to the features studied. The diagnostic evaluation should be similar for patients in the two groups.
Authors: James V Quinn; Ian G Stiell; Daniel A McDermott; Karen L Sellers; Michael A Kohn; George A Wells Journal: Ann Emerg Med Date: 2004-02 Impact factor: 5.721
Authors: Elpidoforos S Soteriades; Jane C Evans; Martin G Larson; Ming Hui Chen; Leway Chen; Emelia J Benjamin; Daniel Levy Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2002-09-19 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: N Colman; K Nahm; K S Ganzeboom; W K Shen; J Reitsma; M Linzer; W Wieling; H Kaufmann Journal: Clin Auton Res Date: 2004-10 Impact factor: 4.435
Authors: M Brignole; M Disertori; C Menozzi; A Raviele; P Alboni; M V Pitzalis; P Delise; E Puggioni; M Del Greco; V Malavasi; M Lunati; M Pepe; D Fabrizi Journal: Europace Date: 2003-07 Impact factor: 5.214
Authors: Steven Gilmore; Joseph Hart; Justen Geddes; Christian H Olsen; Jesper Mehlsen; Pierre Gremaud; Mette S Olufsen Journal: Med Biol Eng Comput Date: 2021-02-13 Impact factor: 2.602
Authors: Monica Solbiati; Viviana Bozzano; Franca Barbic; Giovanni Casazza; Franca Dipaola; James V Quinn; Matthew J Reed; Robert S Sheldon; Win-Kuang Shen; Benjamin C Sun; Venkatesh Thiruganasambandamoorthy; Raffaello Furlan; Giorgio Costantino Journal: Intern Emerg Med Date: 2018-01-18 Impact factor: 3.397