Literature DB >> 15736142

Probabilistic sensitivity analysis for NICE technology assessment: not an optional extra.

Karl Claxton1, Mark Sculpher, Chris McCabe, Andrew Briggs, Ron Akehurst, Martin Buxton, John Brazier, Tony O'Hagan.   

Abstract

Recently the National Institute for Clinical Excellence (NICE) updated its methods guidance for technology assessment. One aspect of the new guidance is to require the use of probabilistic sensitivity analysis with all cost-effectiveness models submitted to the Institute. The purpose of this paper is to place the NICE guidance on dealing with uncertainty into a broader context of the requirements for decision making; to explain the general approach that was taken in its development; and to address each of the issues which have been raised in the debate about the role of probabilistic sensitivity analysis in general. The most appropriate starting point for developing guidance is to establish what is required for decision making. On the basis of these requirements, the methods and framework of analysis which can best meet these needs can then be identified. It will be argued that the guidance on dealing with uncertainty and, in particular, the requirement for probabilistic sensitivity analysis, is justified by the requirements of the type of decisions that NICE is asked to make. Given this foundation, the main issues and criticisms raised during and after the consultation process are reviewed. Finally, some of the methodological challenges posed by the need fully to characterise decision uncertainty and to inform the research agenda will be identified and discussed. Copyright (c) 2005 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15736142     DOI: 10.1002/hec.985

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Econ        ISSN: 1057-9230            Impact factor:   3.046


  118 in total

Review 1.  Economic evaluations of childhood influenza vaccination: a critical review.

Authors:  Anthony T Newall; Mark Jit; Philippe Beutels
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2012-08-01       Impact factor: 4.981

2.  Assessing the real-world cost-effectiveness of adjuvant trastuzumab in HER-2/neu positive breast cancer.

Authors:  Lindsay Hedden; Susan O'Reilly; Caroline Lohrisch; Stephen Chia; Caroline Speers; Laurel Kovacic; Suzanne Taylor; Stuart Peacock
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2012-02-02

3.  Cost effectiveness of quetiapine in patients with acute bipolar depression and in maintenance treatment after an acute depressive episode.

Authors:  Mattias Ekman; Peter Lindgren; Carolin Miltenburger; Genevieve Meier; Julie C Locklear; Mary Lou Chatterton
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2012-06-01       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 4.  Methods to assess the costs and health effects of interventions for improving health in developing countries.

Authors:  David B Evans; Tessa Tan-Torres Edejer; Taghreed Adam; Stephen S Lim
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2005-11-12

5.  Incorporating quality of evidence into decision analytic modeling.

Authors:  R Scott Braithwaite; Mark S Roberts; Amy C Justice
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2007-01-16       Impact factor: 25.391

Review 6.  Practice and potential of economic evaluation of workplace-based interventions for occupational health and safety.

Authors:  Emile Tompa; Roman Dolinschi; Claire de Oliveira
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2006-09

7.  Using discrete choice experiments within a cost-benefit analysis framework: some considerations.

Authors:  Emma McIntosh
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 8.  Economic evaluation and decision making in the UK.

Authors:  Martin J Buxton
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 9.  Analysis sans frontières: can we ever make economic evaluations generalisable across jurisdictions?

Authors:  Mark J Sculpher; Michael F Drummond
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 4.981

10.  An explorative cost-effectiveness analysis of school-based screening for child anxiety using a decision analytic model.

Authors:  Ellin Simon; Carmen D Dirksen; Susan M Bögels
Journal:  Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry       Date:  2013-03-29       Impact factor: 4.785

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.