Literature DB >> 24715506

Interference due to shared features between action plans is influenced by working memory span.

Lisa R Fournier1, Lawrence P Behmer, Alexandra M Stubblefield.   

Abstract

In this study, we examined the interactions between the action plans that we hold in memory and the actions that we carry out, asking whether the interference due to shared features between action plans is due to selection demands imposed on working memory. Individuals with low and high working memory spans learned arbitrary motor actions in response to two different visual events (A and B), presented in a serial order. They planned a response to the first event (A) and while maintaining this action plan in memory they then executed a speeded response to the second event (B). Afterward, they executed the action plan for the first event (A) maintained in memory. Speeded responses to the second event (B) were delayed when it shared an action feature (feature overlap) with the first event (A), relative to when it did not (no feature overlap). The size of the feature-overlap delay was greater for low-span than for high-span participants. This indicates that interference due to overlapping action plans is greater when fewer working memory resources are available, suggesting that this interference is due to selection demands imposed on working memory. Thus, working memory plays an important role in managing current and upcoming action plans, at least for newly learned tasks. Also, managing multiple action plans is compromised in individuals who have low versus high working memory spans.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24715506     DOI: 10.3758/s13423-014-0627-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev        ISSN: 1069-9384


  31 in total

1.  The effect of memory load on negative priming: an individual differences investigation.

Authors:  A R Conway; S W Tuholski; R J Shisler; R W Engle
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1999-11

2.  The role of interference in memory span.

Authors:  C P May; L Hasher; M J Kane
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1999-09

3.  Load theory of selective attention and cognitive control.

Authors:  Nilli Lavie; Aleksandra Hirst; Jan W de Fockert; Essi Viding
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2004-09

4.  Frequency of the first feature in action sequences influences feature binding.

Authors:  Paul S Mattson; Lisa R Fournier; Lawrence P Behmer
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 2.199

5.  An automated version of the operation span task.

Authors:  Nash Unsworth; Richard P Heitz; Josef C Schrock; Randall W Engle
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2005-08

6.  The mechanism of suppression: a component of general comprehension skill.

Authors:  M A Gernsbacher; M E Faust
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1991-03       Impact factor: 3.051

7.  An action sequence held in memory can interfere with response selection of a target stimulus, but does not interfere with response activation of noise stimuli.

Authors:  Paul S Mattson; Lisa R Fournier
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2008-10

8.  What it costs to implement a plan: plan-level and task-level contributions to switch costs.

Authors:  Gordon D Logan
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2007-06

9.  Working memory modulates neural efficiency over motor components during a novel action planning task: an EEG study.

Authors:  Lawrence P Behmer; Lisa R Fournier
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2013-11-27       Impact factor: 3.332

10.  On the importance of being first: serial order effects in the interaction between action plans and ongoing actions.

Authors:  Lisa R Fournier; Jonathan M Gallimore; Kevin R Feiszli; Gordon D Logan
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2014-02
View more
  7 in total

1.  Following Instructions in Patients With Schizophrenia: The Benefits of Actions at Encoding and Recall.

Authors:  Simon S Y Lui; Tian-Xiao Yang; Chris L Y Ng; Peony T Y Wong; Jessica O Y Wong; Ulrich Ettinger; Eric F C Cheung; Raymond C K Chan
Journal:  Schizophr Bull       Date:  2018-01-13       Impact factor: 9.306

2.  Action plan interrupted: resolution of proactive interference while coordinating execution of multiple action plans during sleep deprivation.

Authors:  Lisa R Fournier; Devon A Hansen; Alexandra M Stubblefield; Hans P A Van Dongen
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2018-07-13

3.  Partial repetition between action plans delays responses to ideomotor compatible stimuli.

Authors:  Lisa R Fournier; Benjamin P Richardson
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2021-03-19

4.  Movement Interferes with Visuospatial Working Memory during the Encoding: An ERP Study.

Authors:  Rumeysa Gunduz Can; Thomas Schack; Dirk Koester
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2017-05-29

5.  Beyond Left and Right: Binding and Retrieval of Spatial and Temporal Features of Planned Actions.

Authors:  Viola Mocke; Patricia Holzmann; Bernhard Hommel; Wilfried Kunde
Journal:  J Cogn       Date:  2022-01-06

6.  Partial Repetition Costs are Reduced but not Eliminated with Practice.

Authors:  Lisa R Fournier; Benjamin P Richardson; Gordon D Logan
Journal:  J Cogn       Date:  2022-06-23

7.  Task relevance determines binding of effect features in action planning.

Authors:  Viola Mocke; Lisa Weller; Christian Frings; Klaus Rothermund; Wilfried Kunde
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2020-11       Impact factor: 2.199

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.